Unveiling the dynamic structure evolution of In2O3(110) in the direct oxidation of methane to methanol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Guo X, Fang G, Li G, et al. Direct, nonoxidative conversion of methane to ethylene, aromatics, and hydrogen. Science, 2014, 344: 616–61910.1126/science.1253150 ↗
2. Song Y, Yang X, Liu H, et al. High-pressure electro-fenton driving CH4 conversion by O2 at room temperature. J Am Chem Soc, 2024, 146: 5834–584210.1021/jacs.3c10825 ↗
3. Sun M, Chen Y, Fan X, et al. Electronic asymmetry of lattice oxygen sites in ZnO promotes the photocatalytic oxidative coupling of methane. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 990010.1038/s41467-024-54226-w ↗
4. Harrath K, Yu X, Xiao H, et al. The key role of support surface hydrogenation in the CH4 to CH3OH selective oxidation by a ZrO2-supported single-atom catalyst. ACS Catal, 2019, 9: 8903–890910.1021/acscatal.9b02093 ↗
5. Zhou L, Su YQ, Hu TL. Theoretical insights into the selective oxidation of methane to methanol on single-atom alloy catalysts. Sci China Mater, 2023, 66: 3189–319910.1007/s40843-022-2501-8 ↗
6. Dummer NF, Willock DJ, He Q, et al. Methane oxidation to methanol. Chem Rev, 2023, 123: 6359–641110.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00439 ↗
7. da Silva MJ. Synthesis of methanol from methane: challenges and advances on the multi-step (syngas) and one-step routes (DMTM). Fuel Processing Tech, 2016, 145: 42–6110.1016/j.fuproc.2016.01.023 ↗
8. Akri M, Zhao S, Li X, et al. Atomically dispersed nickel as coke-resistant active sites for methane dry reforming. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 518110.1038/s41467-019-12843-w ↗
9. Ravi M, Sushkevich VL, Knorpp AJ, et al. Misconceptions and challenges in methane-to-methanol over transition-metal-exchanged zeolites. Nat Catal, 2019, 2: 485–49410.1038/s41929-019-0273-z ↗
10. Xu Y, Wu D, Zhang Q, et al. Regulating Au coverage for the direct oxidation of methane to methanol. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 56410.1038/s41467-024-44839-6 ↗
11. Abdelgaid M, Mpourmpakis G. Structure–activity relationships in Lewis acid–base heterogeneous catalysis. ACS Catal, 2022, 12: 4268–428910.1021/acscatal.2c00229 ↗
12. Kiani D, Sourav S, Wachs IE, et al. A combined computational and experimental study of methane activation during oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) by surface metal oxide catalysts. Chem Sci, 2021, 12: 14143–1415810.1039/D1SC02174E ↗
13. Xu X, Faglioni F, Goddard WA. Methane activation by transition-metal oxides, MOx (M = Cr, Mo, W; x = 1, 2, 3). J Phys Chem A, 2002, 106: 7171–717610.1021/jp014572x ↗
14. Wei F, Ge B, Dong P, et al. Uncovering the active sites of single atom-doped rutile oxides during methane activation by data-driven approach. Sci China Mater, 2024, 67: 1231–124210.1007/s40843-023-2771-4 ↗
15. Martin R, Kim M, Asthagiri A, et al. Alkane activation and oxidation on late-transition-metal oxides: challenges and opportunities. ACS Catal, 2021, 11: 4682–470310.1021/acscatal.1c00612 ↗
16. Miao Q, Xiong G, Sheng S, et al. Partial oxidation of methane to syngas over nickel-based catalysts modified by alkali metal oxide and rare earth metal oxide. Appl Catal A-Gen, 1997, 154: 17–2710.1016/S0926-860X(96)00377-8 ↗
17. Zuo Z, Ramírez PJ, Senanayake SD, et al. Low-temperature conversion of methane to methanol on CeOx/Cu2O catalysts: water controlled activation of the C–H bond. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 13810–1381310.1021/jacs.6b08668 ↗
18. Tsuji Y, Yoshizawa K. Adsorption and activation of methane on the (110) surface of rutile-type metal dioxides. J Phys Chem C, 2018, 122: 15359–1538110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03184 ↗
19. Lustemberg PG, Senanayake SD, Rodriguez JA, et al. Tuning selectivity in the direct conversion of methane to methanol: bimetallic synergistic effects on the cleavage of C–H and O–H bonds over NiCu/CeO2 catalysts. J Phys Chem Lett, 2022, 13: 5589–559610.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00885 ↗
20. Guan Q, Ni C, Yan T, et al. Amine functionalized surface frustrated Lewis pairs boost CO2 photocatalysis. EES Catal, 2024, 2: 573–58410.1039/D3EY00261F ↗
21. Liu L, He CC, Zeng J, et al. Theoretical study of oxygen-vacancy distribution in In2O3. J Phys Chem C, 2021, 125: 7077–708510.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01462 ↗
22. Cao A, Wang Z, Li H, et al. Relations between surface oxygen vacancies and activity of methanol formation from CO2 hydrogenation over In2O3 surfaces. ACS Catal, 2021, 11: 1780–178610.1021/acscatal.0c05046 ↗
23. Posada-Borbón A, Grönbeck H. A first-principles-based microkinetic study of CO2 reduction to CH3OH over In2O3 (110). ACS Catal, 2021, 11: 9996–1000610.1021/acscatal.1c01707 ↗
24. Luo L, Fu L, Liu H, et al. Synergy of Pd atoms and oxygen vacancies on In2O3 for methane conversion under visible light. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 293010.1038/s41467-022-30434-0 ↗
25. Jiang Y, Li S, Wang S, et al. Enabling specific photocatalytic methane oxidation by controlling free radical type. J Am Chem Soc, 2023, 145: 2698–270710.1021/jacs.2c13313 ↗
26. Chen Y, Tang S, Li L, et al. Selective photocatalytic conversion of methane induced by Lewis acid–base pair on the surface of In2O3/TiO2 heterojunction photocatalyst. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2023, 11: 3568–357510.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05045 ↗
27. Ye J, Liu C, Mei D, et al. Active oxygen vacancy site for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation on In2O3 (110): a DFT study. ACS Catal, 2013, 3: 1296–130610.1021/cs400132a ↗
28. Hafner J. Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: density-functional theory and beyond. J Comput Chem, 2008, 29: 2044–207810.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
29. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
30. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. Moellmann J, Grimme S. DFT-D3 study of some molecular crystals. J Phys Chem C, 2014, 118: 7615–762110.1021/jp501237c ↗
32. Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J Chem Phys, 2000, 113: 9901–990410.1063/1.1329672 ↗
33. Nelson R, Ertural C, George J, et al. LOBSTER: local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional theory. J Comput Chem, 2020, 41: 1931–194010.1002/jcc.26353 ↗
34. Dronskowski R, Bloechl PE. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations. J Phys Chem, 1993, 97: 8617–862410.1021/j100135a014 ↗
35. Marezio M. Refinement of the crystal structure of In2O3 at two wavelengths. Acta Cryst, 1966, 20: 723–72810.1107/S0365110X66001749 ↗
36. Kozuch S, Shaik S. How to conceptualize catalytic cycles? The energetic span model Acc Chem Res, 2011, 44: 101–11010.1021/ar1000956 ↗
37. Kozuch S, Shaik S. A combined kinetic–quantum mechanical model for assessment of catalytic cycles: application to cross-coupling and Heck reactions. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128: 3355–336510.1021/ja0559146 ↗
38. Wang V, Xu N, Liu JC, et al. VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput Phys Commun, 2021, 267: 10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
39. Posada-Borbón A, Grönbeck H. CO2 adsorption on hydroxylated In2O3 (110). Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2019, 21: 21698–2170810.1039/C9CP04097H ↗
40. Bielz T, Lorenz H, Jochum W, et al. Hydrogen on In2O3: reducibility, bonding, defect formation, and reactivity. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 9022–902910.1021/jp1017423 ↗
41. Yin H, Pu Z, Xue J, et al. Oxygen vacancy-rich TiO2 as an efficient nonnoble metal catalyst toward mild oxidation of methane using hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant. ACS Catal, 2023, 13: 7608–761510.1021/acscatal.3c00986 ↗
42. Siakavelas GI, Charisiou ND, AlKhoori A, et al. Oxidative coupling of methane on Li/CeO2 based catalysts: investigation of the effect of Mg-and La-doping of the CeO2 support. Mol Catal, 2022, 520: 112157
43. Sanville E, Kenny SD, Smith R, et al. Improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J Comput Chem, 2007, 28: 899–90810.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
44. Bligaard T, Nørskov JK, Dahl S, et al. The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis. J Catal, 2004, 224: 206–21710.1016/j.jcat.2004.02.034 ↗
45. Wang P, Shi R, Zhao J, et al. Photodriven methane conversion on transition metal oxide catalyst: recent progress and prospects. Adv Sci, 2024, 11: 230547110.1002/advs.202305471 ↗
46. Chin YHC, Buda C, Neurock M, et al. Consequences of metal–oxide interconversion for C–H bond activation during CH4 reactions on Pd catalysts. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 15425–1544210.1021/ja405004m ↗
47. Latimer AA, Kulkarni AR, Aljama H, et al. Understanding trends in C–H bond activation in heterogeneous catalysis. Nat Mater, 2017, 16: 225–22910.1038/nmat4760 ↗
48. Cao Y, Yang Y, Yu W, et al. Regulating the spin state of single noble metal atoms by hydroxyl for selective dehydrogenation of CH4 direct conversion to CH3OH. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14: 13344–1335110.1021/acsami.1c25203 ↗
49. Ma D, Cao X, Cao Z. Selective oxidation of CH4 to CH3OH by transition-metal single-atom-embedded N-doped graphene catalysts with oxidants N2O and O2: oxygen adsorption energy as an activity descriptor. J Phys Chem C, 2023, 127: 5800–580910.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00549 ↗
50. Psofogiannakis G, St-Amant A, Ternan M. Methane oxidation mechanism on Pt(111): a cluster model DFT study. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110: 24593–2460510.1021/jp061559+ ↗