Recent advances on silica-based nanostructures in photocatalysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Development of highly efficient photocatalysts has emerged as a research hotspot because of their crucial role in affecting the conversion efficiency of solar energy for applications in resource exploitation and environmental purification. The photocatalytic performance of the photocatalysts basically depends on the behaviors of light absorption, charge generation and separation, surface property and structural stability. Owing to its unique advantages (high surface area, tunable porosity, modifiable surface), porous silica provides an interesting platform to construct well-defined nanostructures such as core-shell, yolk-shell and other specific structures which effectively improved one or more of the above behaviors for photocatalysis. Typically, the structure with hollow morphology favors the light scattering and enlargement of surface area, while coating or binding with silica can modify the surface property of a photocatalyst to enhance the surface adsorption of reactants and physicochemical stability of catalysts. This review discusses the recent advances in the design, synthesis, formation mechanism of well-defined silica-based nanostructures, and the achievements of desired physicochemical properties for regulating the photocatalytic performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Fan Y, Hu G, Yu S, et al. Recent advances in TiO2 nanoarrays/graphene for water treatment and energy conversion/storage. Sci China Mater, 2018, 62: 325–34010.1007/s40843-018-9346-3 ↗
2. Li W, Elzatahry A, Aldhayan D, et al. Core-shell structured titanium dioxide nanomaterials for solar energy utilization. Chem Soc Rev, 2018, 47: 8203–823710.1039/C8CS00443A ↗
3. Wang J, Xu M, Zhao J, et al. Anchoring ultrafine Pt electrocatalysts on TiO2-C via photochemical strategy to enhance the stability and efficiency for oxygen reduction reaction. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 237: 228–23610.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.085 ↗
4. Lv K, Yu J, Deng K, et al. Synergistic effects of hollow structure and surface fluorination on the photocatalytic activity of titania. J Hazard Mater, 2010, 173: 539–54310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.119 ↗
5. Zhang K, Ran J, Zhu B, et al. Nanoconfined nickel@carbon core-shell cocatalyst promoting highly efficient visible-light photocatalytic H2 production. Small, 2018, 14: 180170510.1002/smll.201801705 ↗
6. Li X, Yu J, Jaroniec M, et al. Cocatalysts for selective photoreduction of CO2 into solar fuels. Chem Rev, 2019, 119: 3962–417910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00400 ↗
7. Xia Y, Li Q, Lv K, et al. Heterojunction construction between TiO2 hollowsphere and ZnIn2S4 flower for photocatalysis application. Appl Surf Sci, 2017, 398: 81–8810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.006 ↗
8. Li Q, Xia Y, Yang C, et al. Building a direct Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst by ZnIn2S4 nanosheets and TiO2 hollow-spheres for highly-efficient artificial photosynthesis. Chem Eng J, 2018, 349: 287–29610.1016/j.cej.2018.05.094 ↗
9. Qi K, Cheng B, Yu J, et al. A review on TiO2-based Z-scheme photocatalysts. Chin J Catal, 2017, 38: 1936–195510.1016/S1872-2067(17)62962-0 ↗
10. Wang S, Xu M, Peng T, et al. Porous hypercrosslinked polymer-TiO2-graphene composite photocatalysts for visible-light-driven CO2 conversion. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 67610.1038/s41467-019-08651-x ↗
11. Tang Y, Zhou P, Wang K, et al. BiOCl/ultrathin polyaniline core/shell nanosheets with a sensitization mechanism for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Sci China Mater, 2018, 62: 95–10210.1007/s40843-018-9284-0 ↗
12. Fu J, Yu J, Jiang C, et al. g-C3N4-based heterostructured photocatalysts. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 170150310.1002/aenm.201701503 ↗
13. Zhang X, Wei W, Zhang S, et al. Advanced 3D nanohybrid foam based on graphene oxide: facile fabrication strategy, interfacial synergetic mechanism, and excellent photocatalytic performance. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 1888–189710.1007/s40843-019-9473-2 ↗
14. Chen S, Yu J, Zhang J. Enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity of MOF-derived ZnO/NiO porous hollow spheres. J CO2 Util, 2018, 24: 548–55410.1016/j.jcou.2018.02.013 ↗
15. Xu M, Hu X, Wang S, et al. Photothermal effect promoting CO2 conversion over composite photocatalyst with high graphene content. J Catal, 2019, 377: 652–66110.1016/j.jcat.2019.08.010 ↗
16. Ma Y, Wang Z, Xu X, et al. Review on porous nanomaterials for adsorption and photocatalytic conversion of CO2. Chin J Catal, 2017, 38: 1956–196910.1016/S1872-2067(17)62955-3 ↗
17. Han C, Li J, Ma Z, et al. Black phosphorus quantum dot/g-C3N4 composites for enhanced CO2 photoreduction to CO. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 1159–116610.1007/s40843-018-9245-y ↗
18. Xia Y, Cheng B, Fan J, et al. Near-infrared absorbing 2D/3D ZnIn2S4/N-doped graphene photocatalyst for highly efficient CO2 capture and photocatalytic reduction. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 552–56510.1007/s40843-019-1234-x ↗
19. Jin Y, Zhang H, Song C, et al. Hollow ZnICd1-IS nanospheres with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 2999710.1038/srep29997 ↗
20. Ren D, Shen R, Jiang Z, et al. Highly efficient visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution over 2D-2D CdS/Cu7S4 layered hetero-junctions. Chin J Catal, 2020, 41: 31–4010.1016/S1872-2067(19)63467-4 ↗
21. Wang H, Hu X, Ma Y, et al. Nitrate-group-grafting-induced assembly of rutile TiO2 nanobundles for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chin J Catal, 2020, 41: 95–10210.1016/S1872-2067(19)63452-2 ↗
22. Tang Y, Zhou P, Chao Y, et al. Face-to-face engineering of ultrathin Pd nanosheets on amorphous carbon nitride for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 351–35810.1007/s40843-018-9327-y ↗
23. Zhang L, Cui Y, Yang F, et al. Electroless-hydrothermal construction of nickel bridged nickel sulfide@mesoporous carbon nitride hybrids for highly efficient noble metal-free photocatalytic H2 production. J Mater Sci Tech, 2020, 45: 176–18610.1016/j.jmst.2019.11.020 ↗
24. Chen J, Liu W, Li Z, et al. Thermally-assisted photodegradation of lignin by TiO2/H2O2 under visible/near-infrared light irradiation. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 382–39010.1007/s40843-017-9176-8 ↗
25. Yu Y, Yan L, Cheng J, et al. Mechanistic insights into TiO2 thickness in Fe3O4@TiO2-GO composites for enrofloxacin photodegradation. Chem Eng J, 2017, 325: 647–65410.1016/j.cej.2017.05.092 ↗
26. Lu Z, Yu Z, Dong J, et al. Facile microwave synthesis of a Z-scheme imprinted ZnFe2O4/Ag/PEDOT with the specific recognition ability towards improving photocatalytic activity and selectivity for tetracycline. Chem Eng J, 2018, 337: 228–24110.1016/j.cej.2017.12.115 ↗
27. Wang P, Qi C, Hao L, et al. Sepiolite/Cu2O/Cu photocatalyst: preparation and high performance for degradation of organic dye. J Mater Sci Tech, 2019, 35: 285–29110.1016/j.jmst.2018.03.023 ↗
28. Liu J, Zhao Z, Xu C, et al. Structure, synthesis, and catalytic properties of nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions in environmental catalysis. Chin J Catal, 2019, 40: 1438–148710.1016/S1872-2067(19)63400-5 ↗
29. Liu J, Wang L, Song W, et al. BiMOx semiconductors as catalysts for photocatalytic decomposition of N2O: a combination of experimental and DFT+U study. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2019, 7: 2811–282010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06126 ↗
30. Parrino F, Loddo V, Augugliaro V, et al. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: guidelines on experimental setup, catalyst characterization, interpretation, and assessment of reactivity. Catal Rev, 2019, 61: 163–21310.1080/01614940.2018.1546445 ↗
31. Wang M, Peng Z, Qian J, et al. Highly efficient solar-driven photocatalytic degradation on environmental pollutants over a novel C fibers@MoSe2 nanoplates core-shell composite. J Hazard Mater, 2018, 347: 403–41110.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.013 ↗
32. Lu Z, Zhou G, Song M, et al. Development of magnetic imprinted PEDOT/CdS heterojunction photocatalytic nanoreactors: 3-dimensional specific recognition for selectively photocatalyzing danofloxacin mesylate. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2020, 268: 11843310.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118433 ↗
33. He F, Meng A, Cheng B, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of WO3/TiO2 step-scheme heterojunction by graphene modification. Chin J Catal, 2020, 41: 9–2010.1016/S1872-2067(19)63382-6 ↗
34. Li J, Wu N. Semiconductor-based photocatalysts and photoelectrochemical cells for solar fuel generation: a review. Catal Sci Technol, 2015, 5: 1360–138410.1039/C4CY00974F ↗
35. He D, Zhang C, Zeng G, et al. A multifunctional platform by controlling of carbon nitride in the core-shell structure: from design to construction, and catalysis applications. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2019, 258: 11795710.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117957 ↗
36. Liu J, Cheng H, Bao J, et al. Aluminum hydroxide-mediated synthesis of mesoporous metal oxides by a mechanochemical nanocasting strategy. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 22977–2298510.1039/C9TA06727B ↗
37. Deng Y, Yue Q, Sun J, et al. Recent advance in interfacial assembly growth of mesoporous silica on magnetite particles. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20191169010.1002/anie.201911690 ↗
38. Liang J, Liang Z, Zou R, et al. Heterogeneous catalysis in zeolites, mesoporous silica, and metal-organic frameworks. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 170113910.1002/adma.201701139 ↗
39. Fujiwara K, Kuwahara Y, Sumida Y, et al. Fabrication of photocatalytic paper using TiO2 nanoparticles confined in hollow silica capsules. Langmuir, 2017, 33: 288–29510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04003 ↗
40. Wang D, Han D, Shi Z, et al. Optimized design of three-dimensional multi-shell Fe3O4/SiO2/ZnO/ZnSe microspheres with type II heterostructure for photocatalytic applications. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 227: 61–6910.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.002 ↗
41. Tang X, Feng Q, Liu K, et al. A simple and innovative route to remarkably enhance the photocatalytic performance of TiO2: using micro-meso porous silica nanofibers as carrier to support highly-dispersed TiO2 nanoparticles. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2018, 258: 251–26110.1016/j.micromeso.2017.09.024 ↗
42. Wang H, Liu H, Wang S, et al. Influence of tunable pore size on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performances of hierarchical porous TiO2/C nanocomposites synthesized via dual-templating. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 224: 341–34910.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.039 ↗
43. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Asefa T, et al. Core-shell nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44: 7540–759010.1039/C5CS00343A ↗
44. Mohanty S, Babu P, Parida K, et al. Surface-plasmon-resonance-induced photocatalysis by core-shell SiO2@Ag NCs@Ag3PO4 toward water-splitting and phenol oxidation reactions. Inorg Chem, 2019, 58: 9643–965410.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00218 ↗
45. Singh R, Bapat R, Qin L, et al. Atomic layer deposited (ALD) TiO2 on fibrous nano-silica (KCC-1) for photocatalysis: nanoparticle formation and size quantization effect. ACS Catal, 2016, 6: 2770–278410.1021/acscatal.6b00418 ↗
46. Yin Q, Wu W, Qiao R, et al. Glucose-assisted transformation of Ni-doped-ZnO@carbon to a Ni-doped-ZnO@void@SiO2 core-shell nanocomposite photocatalyst. RSC Adv, 2016, 6: 38653–3866110.1039/C5RA26631A ↗
47. Sun L, Wu W, Yang S, et al. Template and silica interlayer tailorable synthesis of spindle-like multilayer a-Fe2O3/Ag/SnO2 ternary hybrid architectures and their enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 1113–112410.1021/am404700h ↗
48. Yang J, Wang J, Li X, et al. Synthesis of urchin-like Fe3O4@ SiO2@ZnO/CdS core-shell microspheres for the repeated photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B under visible light. Catal Sci Technol, 2016, 6: 4525–453410.1039/C5CY02090E ↗
49. Sun L, Han X, Jiang Z, et al. Fabrication of cubic Zn2SnO4/SnO2 complex hollow structures and their sunlight-driven photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 12858–1286210.1039/C5NR08004E ↗
50. Zhao Z, Wang X, Shu Z, et al. Facile preparation of hollownanosphere based mesoporous g-C3N4 for highly enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 455: 591–59810.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.215 ↗
51. Li Z, Li M, Bian Z, et al. Design of highly stable and selective core/yolk-shell nanocatalysts—a review. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2016, 188: 324–34110.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.067 ↗
52. Li A, Zhu W, Li C, et al. Rational design of yolk-shell nanostructures for photocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48: 1874–190710.1039/C8CS00711J ↗
53. Xiao M, Wang Z, Lyu M, et al. Hollow nanostructures for photocatalysis: advantages and challenges. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 180136910.1002/adma.201801369 ↗
54. Feng H, Tang L, Zeng G, et al. Core-shell nanomaterials: applications in energy storage and conversion. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2019, 267: 26–4610.1016/j.cis.2019.03.001 ↗
55. Li W, Zhao D. Extension of the Stöber method to construct mesoporous SiO2 and TiO2 shells for uniform multifunctional core-shell structures. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 142–14910.1002/adma.201203547 ↗
56. Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1968, 26: 62–6910.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5 ↗
57. Gopalan Sibi M, Verma D, Kim J. Magnetic core-shell nanocatalysts: promising versatile catalysts for organic and photocatalytic reactions. Catal Rev, 2020, 62: 163–31110.1080/01614940.2019.1659555 ↗
58. Wu L, Zhou Y, Nie W, et al. Synthesis of highly monodispersed teardrop-shaped core-shell SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles and their photocatalytic activities. Appl Surf Sci, 2015, 351: 320–32610.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.152 ↗
59. Guan Z, Xu Z, Li Q, et al. AgIn5S8 nanoparticles anchored on 2D layered ZnIn2S4 to form 0D/2D heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 227: 512–51810.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.068 ↗
60. Bellardita M, Addamo M, Di Paola A, et al. Photocatalytic activity of TiO2/SiO2 systems. J Hazard Mater, 2010, 174: 707–71310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.108 ↗
61. Ullah S, Ferreira-Neto EP, Pasa AA, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic properties of core@shell SiO2@TiO2 nanoparticles. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2015, 179: 333–34310.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.036 ↗
62. Liu J, Feng J, Gui J, et al. Metal@semiconductor core-shell nanocrystals with atomically organized interfaces for efficient hot electron-mediated photocatalysis. Nano Energy, 2018, 48: 44–5210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.040 ↗
63. Lee R, Kumaresan Y, Yoon SY, et al. Design of gold nanoparticles-decorated SiO2@TiO2 core/shell nanostructures for visible light-activated photocatalysis. RSC Adv, 2017, 7: 7469–747510.1039/C6RA27591E ↗
64. Ye M, Zhou H, Zhang T, et al. Preparation of SiO2@Au@TiO2 core-shell nanostructures and their photocatalytic activities under visible light irradiation. Chem Eng J, 2013, 226: 209–21610.1016/j.cej.2013.04.064 ↗
65. Ma J, Guo X, Ge H, et al. Seed-mediated photodeposition route to Ag-decorated SiO2@TiO2 microspheres with ideal core-shell structure and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 434: 1007–101410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.020 ↗
66. Zelekew OA, Kuo DH, Yassin JM, et al. Synthesis of efficient silica supported TiO2/Ag2O heterostructured catalyst with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Appl Surf Sci, 2017, 410: 454–46310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.089 ↗
67. Liu X, Feng J, Wu B, et al. Monodisperse spherical sandwiched core-shell structured SiO2-Au-Ta2O5 and SiO2-Au-Ta3N5 composites as visible-light plasmonic photocatalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2018, 43: 20546–2056210.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.052 ↗
68. Lin B, Xue C, Yan X, et al. Facile fabrication of novel SiO2/g-C3N4 core-shell nanosphere photocatalysts with enhanced visible light activity. Appl Surf Sci, 2015, 357: 346–35510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.041 ↗
69. Liu X, Zhao L, Domen K, et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen production using visible-light-responsive Ta3N5 photocatalyst supported on monodisperse spherical SiO2 particulates. Mater Res Bull, 2014, 49: 58–6510.1016/j.materresbull.2013.08.069 ↗
70. Lu Z, Zhou G, Song M, et al. Magnetic functional heterojunction reactors with 3D specific recognition for selective photocatalysis and synergistic photodegradation in binary antibiotic solutions. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 13986–1400010.1039/C9TA01863H ↗
71. Gong Y, Wang DP, Wu R, et al. New insights into the photocatalytic activity of 3-D core-shell P25@silica nanocomposites: impact of mesoporous coating. Dalton Trans, 2017, 46: 4994–500210.1039/C7DT00797C ↗
72. Hu J, Wang H, Dong F, et al. A new strategy for utilization of NIR from solar energy—promotion effect generated from photothermal effect of Fe3O4@SiO2 for photocatalytic oxidation of NO. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2017, 204: 584–59210.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.009 ↗
73. Yan X, Zhu X, Li R, et al. Au/BiOCl heterojunction within mesoporous silica shell as stable plasmonic photocatalyst for efficient organic pollutants decomposition under visible light. J Hazard Mater, 2016, 303: 1–910.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.029 ↗
74. Nadrah P, Gaberšček M, Sever Škapin A. Selective degradation of model pollutants in the presence of core@shell TiO2@SiO2 photocatalyst. Appl Surf Sci, 2017, 405: 389–39410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.058 ↗
75. Giesriegl A, Blaschke J, Naghdi S, et al. Rate-limiting steps of dye degradation over titania-silica core-shell photocatalysts. Catalysts, 2019, 9: 58310.3390/catal9070583 ↗
76. Ye M, Zhang Q, Hu Y, et al. Magnetically recoverable core-shell nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem Eur J, 2010, 16: 6243–625010.1002/chem.200903516 ↗
77. Meng X, Zhang Z. Synthesis and characterization of plasmonic and magnetically separable Ag/AgCl-Bi2WO6@Fe3O4@SiO2 core-shell composites for visible light-induced water detoxification. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2017, 485: 296–30710.1016/j.jcis.2016.09.045 ↗
78. Khan M, Fung CSL, Kumar A, et al. Magnetically separable BiOBr/Fe3O4@SiO2 for visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of ibuprofen: mechanistic investigation and prototype development. J Hazard Mater, 2019, 365: 733–74310.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.053 ↗
79. Lin LS, Song J, Yang HH, et al. Yolk-shell nanostructures: design, synthesis, and biomedical applications. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170463910.1002/adma.201704639 ↗
80. Guo X, González KS, Lynn DM. Templated synthesis of polymer-based yolk/shell particles with tunable morphologies. Chem Mater, 2019, 31: 7443–745210.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02107 ↗
81. Yue Q, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Plasmolysis-inspired nanoengineering of functional yolk-shell microspheres with magnetic core and mesoporous silica shell. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 15486–1549310.1021/jacs.7b09055 ↗
82. Purbia R, Paria S. Yolk/shell nanoparticles: classifications, synthesis, properties, and applications. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 19789–1987310.1039/C5NR04729C ↗
83. Chen Y, Chen HR, Shi JL. Construction of homogenous/heterogeneous hollow mesoporous silica nanostructures by silica-etching chemistry: principles, synthesis, and applications. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 47: 125–13710.1021/ar400091e ↗
84. Guiet A, Göbel C, Klingan K, et al. Hydrophobic nanoreactor soft-templating: a supramolecular approach to yolk@shell materials. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 6228–624010.1002/adfm.201502388 ↗
85. Yoo JB, Yoo HJ, Lim BW, et al. Controlled synthesis of monodisperse SiO2-TiO2 microspheres with a yolk-shell structure as effective photocatalysts. ChemSusChem, 2012, 5: 2334–234010.1002/cssc.201200463 ↗
86. Gao X, Wang X, Yang Z, et al. A novel bi-functional SiO2@TiO2/CDs nanocomposite with yolk-shell structure as both efficient SERS substrate and photocatalyst. Appl Surf Sci, 2019, 475: 135–14210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.250 ↗
87. Wan H, Yao W, Zhu W, et al. Fe-N co-doped SiO2@TiO2 yolk-shell hollow nanospheres with enhanced visible light photocatalytic degradation. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 444: 355–36310.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.016 ↗
88. Wu XJ, Xu D. Soft template synthesis of yolk/silica shell particles. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 1516–152010.1002/adma.200903879 ↗
89. Mu Y, Zhang H, Zheng W, et al. Highly stable Au/Pd@mesoporous SiO2 yolk-shell hetero-nanostructures for plasmonenhanced visible light driven catalytic reactions. New J Chem, 2017, 41: 786–79210.1039/C6NJ02990F ↗
90. Hanske C, Sanz-Ortiz MN, Liz-Marzán LM. Silica-coated plasmonic metal nanoparticles in action. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 170700310.1002/adma.201707003 ↗
91. Fujiwara K, Kuwahara Y, Sumida Y, et al. Controlling photocatalytic activity and size selectivity of TiO2 encapsulated in hollow silica spheres by tuning silica shell structures using sacrificial biomolecules. Langmuir, 2017, 33: 6314–632110.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01528 ↗
92. Chen J, Wang D, Qi J, et al. Monodisperse hollow spheres with sandwich heterostructured shells as high-performance catalysts via an extended SiO2 template method. Small, 2015, 11: 420–42510.1002/smll.201402423 ↗
93. Li Y, Shi J. Hollow-structured mesoporous materials: Chemical synthesis, functionalization and applications. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 3176–320510.1002/adma.201305319 ↗
94. Lee YJ, Joo JB, Yin Y, et al. Evaluation of the effective photoexcitation distances in the photocatalytic production of H2 from water using Au@Void@TiO2 yolk-shell nanostructures. ACS Energy Lett, 2016, 1: 52–5610.1021/acsenergylett.6b00040 ↗
95. Shi W, Du D, Shen B, et al. Synthesis of yolk-shell structured Fe3O4@void@CdS nanoparticles: a general and effective structure design for photo-fenton reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 20831–2083810.1021/acsami.6b07644 ↗
96. Liang M, Borjigin T, Zhang Y, et al. Z-scheme Au@Void@g-C3N4/SnS yolk-shell heterostructures for superior photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible light. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 34123–3413110.1021/acsami.8b09455 ↗
97. Yamashita H, Mori K, Kuwahara Y, et al. Single-site and nanoconfined photocatalysts designed in porous materials for environmental uses and solar fuels. Chem Soc Rev, 2018, 47: 8072–809610.1039/C8CS00341F ↗
98. Zheng Y, Cai J, Lv K, et al. Hydrogen peroxide assisted rapid synthesis of TiO2 hollow microspheres with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2014, 147: 789–79510.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.011 ↗
99. Zhang P, Lou XWD. Design of heterostructured hollow photocatalysts for solar-to-chemical energy conversion. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 190028110.1002/adma.201900281 ↗
100. Leshuk T, Linley S, Baxter G, et al. Mesoporous hollow sphere titanium dioxide photocatalysts through hydrothermal silica etching. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2012, 4: 6062–607010.1021/am3016922 ↗