Machine learning-based prediction of mechanical properties of N-doped γ-graphdiyne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Li G, Li Y, Liu H, et al. Architecture of graphdiyne nanoscale films. Chem Commun, 2010, 46: 325610.1039/b922733d ↗
2. Li R, Li X, Zhang M, et al. A universal Fe/N incorporated graphdiyne for printing flexible ferromagnetic semiconducting electronics. J Phys Chem Lett, 2021, 12: 204–21010.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03309 ↗
3. Zu Y, Guo J, Hao Q, et al. Graphdiyne as a saturable absorber for 2 µm all-solid-state Q-switched laser. Sci China Mater, 2021, 64: 683–69010.1007/s40843-020-1490-9 ↗
4. Xue Y, Huang B, Yi Y, et al. Anchoring zero valence single atoms of nickel and iron on graphdiyne for hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 146010.1038/s41467-018-03896-4 ↗
5. Kan X, Fan C, Wu C, et al. Graphdiyne-supported atomic catalysts: Synthesis and applications. ChemPlusChem, 2020, 85: 2570–257910.1002/cplu.202000631 ↗
6. Xue Y, Zuo Z, Li Y, et al. Graphdiyne-supported NiCo2S4 nanowires: A highly active and stable 3D bifunctional electrode material. Small, 2017, 13: 170093610.1002/smll.201700936 ↗
7. Huang C, Zhang S, Liu H, et al. Graphdiyne for high capacity and longlife lithium storage. Nano Energy, 2015, 11: 481–48910.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.036 ↗
8. Zuo Z, Shang H, Chen Y, et al. A facile approach for graphdiyne preparation under atmosphere for an advanced battery anode. Chem Commun, 2017, 53: 8074–807710.1039/C7CC03200E ↗
9. Sun C, Searles DJ. Lithium storage on graphdiyne predicted by DFT calculations. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116: 26222–2622610.1021/jp309638z ↗
10. Yue Q, Chang S, Kang J, et al. Mechanical and electronic properties of graphyne and its family under elastic strain: Theoretical predictions. J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117: 14804–1481110.1021/jp4021189 ↗
11. Long M, Tang L, Wang D, et al. Electronic structure and carrier mobility in graphdiyne sheet and nanoribbons: Theoretical predictions. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 2593–260010.1021/nn102472s ↗
12. Liu L, Kan Y, Ran G, et al. Graphdiyne oxide-accelerated charge carrier transfer and separation at the interface for efficient binary organic solar cells. Sci China Mater, 2022, 65: 2647–265610.1007/s40843-022-2019-4 ↗
13. He J, Wang N, Cui Z, et al. Hydrogen substituted graphdiyne as carbon-rich flexible electrode for lithium and sodium ion batteries. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 117210.1038/s41467-017-01202-2 ↗
14. Wang N, He J, Tu Z, et al. Synthesis of chlorine-substituted graphdiyne and applications for lithium-ion storage. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56: 10740–1074510.1002/anie.201704779 ↗
15. Kang H, Chen Y, Xu L, et al. Top-down strategy synthesis of fluorinated graphdiyne for lithium ion battery. RSC Adv, 2019, 9: 31406–3141210.1039/C9RA05974A ↗
16. Zhang S, Du H, He J, et al. Nitrogen-doped graphdiyne applied for lithium-ion storage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 8467–847310.1021/acsami.6b00255 ↗
17. Yang Z, Shen X, Wang N, et al. Graphdiyne containing atomically precise N atoms for efficient anchoring of lithium ion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 2608–261710.1021/acsami.8b01823 ↗
18. Makaremi M, Mortazavi B, Rabczuk T, et al. Theoretical investigation: 2D N-graphdiyne nanosheets as promising anode materials for Li/Na rechargeable storage devices. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2019, 2: 127–13510.1021/acsanm.8b01751 ↗
19. Zhang S, He J, Zheng J, et al. Porous graphdiyne applied for sodium ion storage. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5: 2045–205110.1039/C6TA09822C ↗
20. Jiang T, Chen K, Wang J, et al. Nitrogen-doped graphdiyne nanowall stabilized dendrite-free lithium metal anodes. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 27535–2754610.1039/C9TA09551A ↗
21. Ganesan Y, Peng C, Lu Y, et al. Effect of nitrogen doping on the mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 7637–764310.1021/nn102372w ↗
22. Mortazavi B, Makaremi M, Shahrokhi M, et al. N-graphdiyne two-dimensional nanomaterials: Semiconductors with low thermal conductivity and high stretchability. Carbon, 2018, 137: 57–6710.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.090 ↗
23. Mortazavi B, Shahrokhi M, Madjet ME, et al. N-, B-, P-, Al-, As-, and Ga-graphdiyne/graphyne lattices: First-principles investigation of mechanical, optical and electronic properties. J Mater Chem C, 2019, 7: 3025–303610.1039/C9TC00082H ↗
24. Yang B, Song B, Zhang C, et al. Temperature-dependent brittle-ductile transition of a-graphyne nanoscroll and its micromechanism. Carbon, 2022, 191: 98–10510.1016/j.carbon.2022.01.040 ↗
25. Zhang C, Yang B, Wang C, et al. Temperature-dependent brittle-ductile transition of a-graphyne nanotubes under uniaxial tension. Comput Mater Sci, 2021, 187: 11008310.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110083 ↗
26. Lv Q, Si W, Yang Z, et al. Nitrogen-doped porous graphdiyne: A highly efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 29744–2975210.1021/acsami.7b08115 ↗
27. Zhao Y, Wan J, Yao H, et al. Few-layer graphdiyne doped with sp-hybridized nitrogen atoms at acetylenic sites for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. Nat Chem, 2018, 10: 924–93110.1038/s41557-018-0100-1 ↗
28. Han J, Zhang L, Car R, et al. Deep potential: A general representation of a many-body potential energy surface. Commun Comput Phys, 2018, 23: 629–63910.4208/cicp.OA-2017-0213 ↗
29. Soria FA, Zhang W, Paredes-Olivera PA, et al. Si/C/H ReaxFF reactive potential for silicon surfaces grafted with organic molecules. J Phys Chem C, 2018, 122: 23515–2352710.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07075 ↗
30. Singh SK, Srinivasan SG, Neek-Amal M, et al. Thermal properties of fluorinated graphene. Phys Rev B, 2013, 87: 10411410.1103/PhysRevB.87.104114 ↗
31. Monti S, Li C, Carravetta V. Reactive dynamics simulation of mono-layer and multilayer adsorption of glycine on Cu (110). J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117: 5221–522810.1021/jp312828d ↗
32. Kinaci A, Haskins JB, Sevik C, et al. Thermal conductivity of BN-C nanostructures. Phys Rev B, 2012, 86: 11541010.1103/PhysRevB.86.115410 ↗
33. Chantrenne P, Barrat JL. Finite size effects in determination of thermal conductivities: Comparing molecular dynamics results with simple models. J Heat Transfer, 2004, 126: 577–58510.1115/1.1777582 ↗
34. Yeh IC, Hummer G. System-size dependence of diffusion coefficients and viscosities from molecular dynamics simulations with periodic boundary conditions. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 108: 15873–1587910.1021/jp0477147 ↗
35. Behler J, Parrinello M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98: 14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
36. Artrith N, Morawietz T, Behler J. High-dimensional neural-network potentials for multicomponent systems: Applications to zinc oxide. Phys Rev B, 2011, 83: 15310110.1103/PhysRevB.83.153101 ↗
37. Artrith N, Kolpak AM. Grand canonical molecular dynamics simulations of Cu-Au nanoalloys in thermal equilibrium using reactive ANN potentials. Comput Mater Sci, 2015, 110: 20–2810.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.046 ↗
38. Bartök AP, Kermode J, Bernstein N, et al. Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon. Phys Rev X, 2018, 8: 041048
39. Tsubaki M, Mizoguchi T. Quantum deep field: Data-driven wave function, electron density generation, and atomization energy prediction and extrapolation with machine learning. Phys Rev Lett, 2020, 125: 20640110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.206401 ↗
40. Novikov IS, Gubaev K, Podryabinkin EV, et al. The MLIP package: Moment tensor potentials with MPI and active learning. Mach Learn-Sci Technol, 2021, 2: 02500210.1088/2632-2153/abc9fe ↗
41. Vandermause J, Torrisi SB, Batzner S, et al. On-the-fly active learning of interpretable Bayesian force fields for atomistic rare events. npj Comput Mater, 2020, 6: 2010.1038/s41524-020-0283-z ↗
42. Lubbers N, Smith JS, Barros K. Hierarchical modeling of molecular energies using a deep neural network. J Chem Phys, 2018, 148: 24171510.1063/1.5011181 ↗
43. Schütt KT, Kindermans PJ,, Sauceda HE, et al. SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, 2017. 992–1002
44. Liu X, He Q, Lu W, et al. Machine learning atomic dynamics to unfold the origin of plasticity in metallic glasses: From thermo- to acousto-plastic flow. Sci China Mater, 2022, 65: 1952–196210.1007/s40843-021-1990-2 ↗
45. Zhang L, Lin DY, Wang H, et al. Active learning of uniformly accurate interatomic potentials for materials simulation. Phys Rev Mater, 2019, 3: 02380410.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.023804 ↗
46. Jia W, Wang H, Chen M, et al. Pushing the limit of molecular dynamics with ab initio accuracy to 100 million atoms with machine learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. Atlanta, 202010.1109/SC41405.2020.00009 ↗
47. Zeng J, Cao L, Xu M, et al. Complex reaction processes in combustion unraveled by neural network-based molecular dynamics simulation. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 571310.1038/s41467-020-19497-z ↗
48. Chen X, Jørgensen MS, Li J, et al. Atomic energies from a convolutional neural network. J Chem Theor Comput, 2018, 14: 3933–394210.1021/acs.jctc.8b00149 ↗
49. Lu X, Meng Q, Wang X, et al. Rate coefficients of the H + H2O2 → H2 + HO2 reaction on an accurate fundamental invariant-neural network potential energy surface. J Chem Phys, 2018, 149: 17430310.1063/1.5063613 ↗
50. Zhang Y, Zhou X, Jiang B. Bridging the gap between direct dynamics and globally accurate reactive potential energy surfaces using neural networks. J Phys Chem Lett, 2019, 10: 1185–119110.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00085 ↗
51. Gartner TE, Zhang L, Piaggi PM, et al. Signatures of a liquid-liquid transition in an ab initio deep neural network model for water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117: 26040–2604610.1073/pnas.2015440117 ↗
52. Li C, Liang C, Rouzhahong Y, et al. Transferable prediction of inter-molecular coupling achieved by hierarchical material representation. Sci China Mater, 2023, 66: 819–82610.1007/s40843-022-2198-5 ↗
53. Wang H, Zhang L, Han J, et al. DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics. Comput Phys Commun, 2018, 228: 178–18410.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.016 ↗
54. Zhang Y, Wang H, Chen W, et al. DP-GEN: A concurrent learning platform for the generation of reliable deep learning based potential energy models. Comput Phys Commun, 2020, 253: 10720610.1016/j.cpc.2020.107206 ↗
55. Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys, 1995, 117: 1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
56. Shinoda W, Shiga M, Mikami M. Rapid estimation of elastic constants by molecular dynamics simulation under constant stress. Phys Rev B, 2004, 69: 13410310.1103/PhysRevB.69.134103 ↗
57. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph, 1996, 14: 33–3810.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
58. Shen X Y, Yang Z, Wang K, et al. Nitrogen-doped graphdiyne as high-capacity electrode materials for both lithium-ion and sodium-ion capacitors. ChemElectroChem, 2018, 5: 1435–144310.1002/celc.201800300 ↗