Metastructure strategies for d33 enhancement beyond intrinsic limits in 3D-printed BaTiO3 metamaterials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Liao WQ, Zhao D, Tang YY, et al. A molecular perovskite solid solution with piezoelectricity stronger than lead zirconate titanate. Science, 2019, 363: 1206–121010.1126/science.aav3057 ↗
2. Wang D, Fan Z, Rao G, et al. Ultrahigh piezoelectricity in lead-free piezoceramics by synergistic design. Nano Energy, 2020, 76: 10494410.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104944 ↗
3. Lee M. Piezoelectrics mix it up. Nat Electron, 2019, 2: 17410.1038/s41928-019-0253-y ↗
4. Falconi C. Piezoelectric nanotransducers. Nano Energy, 2019, 59: 730–74410.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.027 ↗
5. Hlinka J. Doubling up piezoelectric performance. Science, 2019, 364: 228–22910.1126/science.aax0693 ↗
6. Tu D, Xu C, Yoshida A, et al. LiNbO3:Pr3+: a multipiezo material with simultaneous piezoelectricity and sensitive piezoluminescence. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 160691410.1002/adma.201606914 ↗
7. Sun X, Li R, Yang Z, et al. Modulating polarization rotation to stimulate the high piezocatalytic activity of (K, Na)NbO3 lead-free piezoelectric materials. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2022, 313: 12147110.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121471 ↗
8. Shimizu K, Hojo H, Ikuhara Y, et al. Piezoelectric materials: enhanced piezoelectric response due to polarization rotation in cobalt-substituted BiFeO3 epitaxial thin films (Adv. Mater. 39/2016). Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 878510.1002/adma.201670277 ↗
9. Zhou W, Chen P, Pan Q, et al. Lead-free metamaterials with enormous apparent piezoelectric response. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 6349–635510.1002/adma.201502562 ↗
10. Huangfu G, Zeng K, Wang B, et al. Giant electric field-induced strain in lead-free piezoceramics. Science, 2022, 378: 1125–113010.1126/science.ade2964 ↗
11. Cui H, Hensleigh R, Yao D, et al. Three-dimensional printing of piezoelectric materials with designed anisotropy and directional response. Nat Mater, 2019, 18: 234–24110.1038/s41563-018-0268-1 ↗
12. Yu X, Zhou J, Liang H, et al. Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: a brief review. Prog Mater Sci, 2018, 94: 114–17310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003 ↗
13. Guo C, Luo Y. Light people: Prof. Sir John Pendry, father of metamaterials, spoke about the future of meta. Light Sci Appl, 2023, 12: 4510.1038/s41377-023-01082-w ↗
14. Zaiser M, Zapperi S. Disordered mechanical metamaterials. Nat Rev Phys, 2023, 5: 679–68810.1038/s42254-023-00639-3 ↗
15. Kim K, Zhu W, Qu X, et al. 3D optical printing of piezoelectric nanoparticle-polymer composite materials. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 9799–980610.1021/nn503268f ↗
16. Zeng Y, Jiang L, Sun Y, et al. 3D-printing piezoelectric composite with honeycomb structure for ultrasonic devices. Micromachines, 2020, 11: 71310.3390/mi11080713 ↗
17. Goat CA, Whatmore RW. The effect of grinding conditions on lead zirconate titanate machinability. J Eur Ceramic Soc, 1999, 19: 1311–131310.1016/S0955-2219(98)00426-9 ↗
18. Cui H, Yao D, Hensleigh R, et al. Design and printing of proprioceptive three-dimensional architected robotic metamaterials. Science, 2022, 376: 1287–129310.1126/science.abn0090 ↗
19. Chen C, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. Additive manufacturing of piezoelectric materials. Adv Funct Mater, 2020, 30: 200514110.1002/adfm.202005141 ↗
20. Chen Z, Song X, Lei L, et al. 3D printing of piezoelectric element for energy focusing and ultrasonic sensing. Nano Energy, 2016, 27: 78–8610.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.048 ↗
21. Liu K, Hu J, Du Y, et al. Influence of particle size on 3D-printed piezoelectric ceramics via digital light processing with furnace sintering. Int J Appl Ceramic Tech, 2022, ijac.1407410.1111/ijac.14074 ↗
22. Lou Q, Shi X, Ruan X, et al. Ferroelectric properties of Li-doped BaTiO3 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc, 2018, 101: 3597–360410.1111/jace.15480 ↗
23. Kim S, Miyauchi R, Sato Y, et al. Piezoelectric actuation mechanism involving extrinsic nanodomain dynamics in lead-free piezoelectrics. Adv Mater, 2023, 35: 220871710.1002/adma.202208717 ↗
24. Yao L, Zhou S, Pan L, et al. Multifunctional metamaterial microwave blackbody with high-frequency compatibility, temperature insensitivity, and structural scalability. Adv Funct Mater, 2023, 33: 220934010.1002/adfm.202209340 ↗
25. Al-Ketan O, Abu Al-Rub RK. Multifunctional mechanical metamaterials based on triply periodic minimal surface lattices. Adv Eng Mater, 2019, 21: 190052410.1002/adem.201900524 ↗
26. Yao L, Yang W, Zhou S, et al. Top-down parametrization-design of orientation-reinforced SiOC-based perfect metamaterial microwave absorber with wide-temperature adaptability. Acta Mater, 2023, 249: 11880310.1016/j.actamat.2023.118803 ↗
27. Al-Ketan O, Rezgui R, Rowshan R, et al. Microarchitected stretching-dominated mechanical metamaterials with minimal surface topologies. Adv Eng Mater, 2018, 20: 180002910.1002/adem.201800029 ↗
28. Sun Q, Gu Q, Zhu K, et al. Crystalline structure, defect chemistry and room temperature colossal permittivity of Nd-doped barium titanate. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 4227410.1038/srep42274 ↗
29. Huang Y, Biao LU, Yi-Xuan Z, et al. Grain size effect on dielectric, piezoelectric and ferroelectric property of BaTiO3 ceramics with fine grains. J Inorg Mater, 2018, 33: 767–77310.15541/jim20170289 ↗
30. Waqar M, Wu H, Chen J, et al. Evolution from lead-based to lead-free piezoelectrics: engineering of lattices, domains, boundaries, and defects leading to giant response. Adv Mater, 2022, 34: 210684510.1002/adma.202106845 ↗
31. Qian W, Yang W, Zhang Y, et al. Piezoelectric materials for controlling electro-chemical processes. Nano-Micro Lett, 2020, 12: 14910.1007/s40820-020-00489-z ↗
32. Fu H, Cohen RE. Polarization rotation mechanism for ultrahigh electromechanical response in single-crystal piezoelectrics. Nature, 2000, 403: 281–28310.1038/35002022 ↗
33. Tan Y, Zhang J, Wu Y, et al. Unfolding grain size effects in barium titanate ferroelectric ceramics. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 995310.1038/srep09953 ↗
34. Li JY, Rogan RC, Üstündag E, et al. Domain switching in polycrystalline ferroelectric ceramics. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 776–78110.1038/nmat1485 ↗
35. Li Z, Roscow J, Khanbareh H, et al. Porous structure enhances the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient and electromechanical coupling coefficient of lead-free (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.1Ti0.9)O3. Adv Sci, 2024, 11: 240625510.1002/advs.202406255 ↗
36. Guillemet-Fritsch S, Valdez-Nava Z, Tenailleau C, et al. Colossal permittivity in ultrafine grain size BaTiO3−x, and Ba0.95La0.05TiO3−x materials. Adv Mater, 2008, 20: 551–55510.1002/adma.200700245 ↗
37. Han H, Voisin C, Guillemet-Fritsch S, et al. Origin of colossal permittivity in BaTiO3 via broadband dielectric spectroscopy. J Appl Phys, 2013, 113: 02410210.1063/1.4774099 ↗
38. Gao Z, Lei Y, Li Z, et al. Artificial piezoelectric metamaterials. Prog Mater Sci, 2025, 151: 10143410.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101434 ↗
39. Callens SJP, Arns CH, Kuliesh A, et al. Decoupling minimal surface metamaterial properties through multi-material hyperbolic tilings. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 210137310.1002/adfm.202101373 ↗
40. Roscow JI, Lewis RWC, Taylor J, et al. Modelling and fabrication of porous sandwich layer barium titanate with improved piezoelectric energy harvesting figures of merit. Acta Mater, 2017, 128: 207–21710.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.029 ↗
41. Zhang Y, Roscow J, Lewis R, et al. Understanding the effect of porosity on the polarisation-field response of ferroelectric materials. Acta Mater, 2018, 154: 100–11210.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.007 ↗
42. Yao D, Cui H, Hensleigh R, et al. Achieving the upper bound of piezoelectric response in tunable, wearable 3D printed nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 190386610.1002/adfm.201903866 ↗
43. Chen Z, Xie YM, Wu X, et al. On hybrid cellular materials based on triply periodic minimal surfaces with extreme mechanical properties. Mater Des, 2019, 183: 10810910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108109 ↗
44. Zhang L, Song B, Choi SK, et al. Anisotropy-inspired, simulation-guided design and 3D printing of microlattice metamaterials with tailored mechanical-transport performances. Compos Part B-Eng, 2022, 236: 10983710.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109837 ↗
45. Liu Y, Wang Y, Ren H, et al. Ultrastiff metamaterials generated through a multilayer strategy and topology optimization. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 298410.1038/s41467-024-47089-8 ↗
46. Wang M, Shi S, Fineberg J. Tensile cracks can shatter classical speed limits. Science, 2023, 381: 415–41910.1126/science.adg7693 ↗
47. Lv Z, Yang W, Yao L, et al. Electromagnetic response mechanism of BaTiO3-based metamaterials: transition between microwave absorption and shielding capacity. Addit Manuf, 2024, 95: 104558