Roll-to-roll gravure printed organic solar cells based on low-cost polythiophene donor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Li Y, Huang X, SheriffJr HKM, et al. Semitransparent organic photovoltaics for building-integrated photovoltaic applications. Nat Rev Mater, 2022, 8: 186–20110.1038/s41578-022-00514-0 ↗
2. Reese MO, Glynn S, Kempe MD, et al. Increasing markets and decreasing package weight for high-specific-power photovoltaics. Nat Energy, 2018, 3: 1002–101210.1038/s41560-018-0258-1 ↗
3. Liang Y, Zhang D, Wu Z, et al. Organic solar cells using oligomer acceptors for improved stability and efficiency. Nat Energy, 2022, 7: 1180–119010.1038/s41560-022-01155-x ↗
4. Yuan J, Zhang Y, Zhou L, et al. Single-junction organic solar cell with over 15% efficiency using fused-ring acceptor with electron-deficient core. Joule, 2019, 3: 1140–115110.1016/j.joule.2019.01.004 ↗
5. Li C, Zhou J, Song J, et al. Non-fullerene acceptors with branched side chains and improved molecular packing to exceed 18% efficiency in organic solar cells. Nat Energy, 2021, 6: 605–61310.1038/s41560-021-00820-x ↗
6. Cui Y, Yao H, Zhang J, et al. Single-junction organic photovoltaic cells with approaching 18% efficiency. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 190820510.1002/adma.201908205 ↗
7. Zhu L, Zhang M, Xu J, et al. Single-junction organic solar cells with over 19% efficiency enabled by a refined double-fibril network morphology. Nat Mater, 2022, 21: 656–66310.1038/s41563-022-01244-y ↗
8. Zuo L, Jo SB, Li Y, et al. Dilution effect for highly efficient multiple-component organic solar cells. Nat Nanotechnol, 2021, 17: 53–6010.1038/s41565-021-01011-1 ↗
9. Cai Y, Li Q, Lu G, et al. Vertically optimized phase separation with improved exciton diffusion enables efficient organic solar cells with thick active layers. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 236910.1038/s41467-022-29803-6 ↗
10. Chen H, Zhang R, Chen X, et al. A guest-assisted molecular-organization approach for >17% efficiency organic solar cells using environmentally friendly solvents. Nat Energy, 2021, 6: 1045–105310.1038/s41560-021-00923-5 ↗
11. Ma R, Zhou K, Sun Y, et al. Achieving high efficiency and well-kept ductility in ternary all-polymer organic photovoltaic blends thanks to two well miscible donors. Matter, 2022, 5: 725–73410.1016/j.matt.2021.12.002 ↗
12. Sun Y, Nian L, Kan Y, et al. Rational control of sequential morphology evolution and vertical distribution toward 17.18% efficiency all-small-molecule organic solar cells. Joule, 2022, 6: 2835–284810.1016/j.joule.2022.10.005 ↗
13. Miao Y, Sun Y, Zou W, et al. Isomerization engineering of solid additives enables highly efficient organic solar cells via manipulating molecular stacking and aggregation of active layer. Adv Mater, 2024, 36: 240662310.1002/adma.202406623 ↗
14. Jiang Y, Dong X, Sun L, et al. An alcohol-dispersed conducting polymer complex for fully printable organic solar cells with improved stability. Nat Energy, 2022, 7: 352–35910.1038/s41560-022-00997-9 ↗
15. Qin F, Wang W, Sun L, et al. Robust metal ion-chelated polymer interfacial layer for ultraflexible non-fullerene organic solar cells. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 450810.1038/s41467-020-18373-0 ↗
16. Wang Y, Zheng Z, Wang J, et al. New method for preparing ZnO layer for efficient and stable organic solar cells. Adv Mater, 2023, 35: e220830510.1002/adma.202208305 ↗
17. Kan Y, Sun Y, Ren Y, et al. Amino-functionalized graphdiyne derivative as a cathode interface layer with high thickness tolerance for highly efficient organic solar cells. Adv Mater, 2024, 36: 231263510.1002/adma.202312635 ↗
18. Zhu L, Zhang M, Zhou G, et al. Achieving 20.8% organic solar cells via additive-assisted layer-by-layer fabrication with bulk p-i-n structure and improved optical management. Joule, 2024, 8: 1–1610.1016/j.joule.2024.08.001 ↗
19. Zhang T, Xu Y, Yao H, et al. Suppressing the energetic disorder of allpolymer solar cells enables over 18% efficiency. Energy Environ Sci, 2023, 16: 1581–158910.1039/D2EE03535A ↗
20. Ma L, Zhang S, Ren J, et al. Design of a fully non-fused bulk heterojunction toward efficient and low-cost organic photovoltaics. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2023, 62: e20221408810.1002/anie.202214088 ↗
21. Li H, Liu S, Wu X, et al. Advances in the device design and printing technology for eco-friendly organic photovoltaics. Energy Environ Sci, 2023, 16: 76–8810.1039/D2EE03246E ↗
22. Xue P, Cheng P, Han RPS, et al. Printing fabrication of large-area non-fullerene organic solar cells. Mater Horiz, 2022, 9: 194–21910.1039/D1MH01317C ↗
23. Zhao X, Sun R, Wu X, et al. High-speed printing of a bulk-heterojunction architecture in organic solar cells films. Energy Environ Sci, 2023, 16: 1711–172010.1039/D2EE03966D ↗
24. Li M, Zhang K, Qiao J, et al. Controlling kinetic quenching depth toward high-performance and photo-stable organic solar cells printed from a non-halogenated solvent. Adv Funct Mater, 2023, 33: 221436110.1002/adfm.202214361 ↗
25. Sondergaard R, Hösel M, Angmo D, et al. Roll-to-roll fabrication of polymer solar cells. Mater Today, 2012, 15: 36–4910.1016/S1369-7021(12)70019-6 ↗
26. Krebs FC, Tromholt T, Jørgensen M. Upscaling of polymer solar cell fabrication using full roll-to-roll processing. Nanoscale, 2010, 2: 873–88610.1039/b9nr00430k ↗
27. Ng LWT, Lee SW, Chang DW, et al. Organic photovoltaics’ new renaissance: advances toward roll-to-roll manufacturing of non-fullerene acceptor organic photovoltaics. Adv Mater Technol, 2022, 7: 210155610.1002/admt.202101556 ↗
28. Liu Y, Liu B, Ma CQ, et al. Recent progress in organic solar cells (Part II device engineering). Sci China Chem, 2022, 65: 1457–149710.1007/s11426-022-1256-8 ↗
29. Wang Z, Guo J, Pan Y, et al. Manipulating the macroscopic and microscopic morphology of large-area gravure-printed ZnO films for high-performance flexible organic solar cells. Energy Environ Mater, 2023, 7: e1259210.1002/eem2.12592 ↗
30. Krebs FC. Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A review of printing and coating techniques. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2009, 93: 394–41210.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.004 ↗
31. Wang G, Adil MA, Zhang J, et al. Large-area organic solar cells: material requirements, modular designs, and printing methods. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 180508910.1002/adma.201805089 ↗
32. Yang F, Huang Y, Li Y, et al. Large-area flexible organic solar cells. npj Flex Electron, 2021, 5: 3010.1038/s41528-021-00128-6 ↗
33. Kim YY, Yang TY, Suhonen R, et al. Roll-to-roll gravure-printed flexible perovskite solar cells using eco-friendly antisolvent bathing with wide processing window. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 514610.1038/s41467-020-18940-5 ↗
34. Kim YY, Yang T, Suhonen R, et al. Gravure-printed flexible perovskite solar cells: toward roll-to-roll manufacturing. Adv Sci, 2019, 6: 180209410.1002/advs.201802094 ↗
35. Välimäki M, Jansson E, Korhonen P, et al. Custom-shaped organic photovoltaic modules—freedom of design by printing. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2017, 12: 11710.1186/s11671-017-1871-9 ↗
36. Kopola P, Aernouts T, Sliz R, et al. Gravure printed flexible organic photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2011, 95: 1344–134710.1016/j.solmat.2010.12.020 ↗
37. Välimäki M, Apilo P, Po R, et al. R2R-printed inverted OPV modules–towards arbitrary patterned designs. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 9570–958010.1039/C5NR00204D ↗
38. Wang Z, Han Y, Yan L, et al. High power conversion efficiency of 13.61% for 1 cm2 flexible polymer solar cells based on patternable and mass-producible gravure-printed silver nanowire electrodes. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 200727610.1002/adfm.202007276 ↗
39. Liu Y, Wang Z, Pan Y, et al. The influence mechanism of ink viscosity on ink transfer rates and film defects of the roll-to-roll printed organic photoactive layers. Sci China Mater, 2024, 67: 2600–261010.1007/s40843-024-2982-9 ↗
40. Xian K, Ma R, Zhou K, et al. Miscibility screening promotes the efficiency and stability of P3HT-based organic solar cells. Aggregate, 2023, 5: e46610.1002/agt2.466 ↗
41. Yuan X, Zhao Y, Xie D, et al. Polythiophenes for organic solar cells with efficiency surpassing 17%. Joule, 2022, 6: 647–66110.1016/j.joule.2022.02.006 ↗
42. Kopola P, Aernouts T, Guillerez S, et al. High efficient plastic solar cells fabricated with a high-throughput gravure printing method. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2010, 94: 1673–168010.1016/j.solmat.2010.05.027 ↗
43. Schneider A, Traut N, Hamburger M. Analysis and optimization of relevant parameters of blade coating and gravure printing processes for the fabrication of highly efficient organic solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2014, 126: 149–15410.1016/j.solmat.2014.03.048 ↗
44. Hernandez-Sosa G, Bornemann N, Ringle I, et al. Rheological and drying considerations for uniformly gravure-printed layers: towards large-area flexible organic light-emitting diodes. Adv Funct Mater, 2013, 23: 3164–317110.1002/adfm.201202862 ↗
45. Beek WJE, Wienk MM, Kemerink M, et al. Hybrid zinc oxide conjugated polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. J Phys Chem B, 2005, 109: 9505–951610.1021/jp050745x ↗
46. Grau G, Cen J, Kang H, et al. Gravure-printed electronics: Recent progress in tooling development, understanding of printing physics, and realization of printed devices. Flex Print Electron, 2016, 1: 02300210.1088/2058-8585/1/2/023002 ↗
47. Tan X, Li Y, Yuan X, et al. Polythiophene solar cells processed from non-halogenated solvent with 15.68% efficiency. Sci China Chem, 2023, 66: 2347–235310.1007/s11426-023-1695-x ↗
48. Wang H, Liu S, Li H, et al. Green printing for scalable organic photovoltaic modules by controlling the gradient Marangoni flow. Adv Mater, 2024, 36: 231309810.1002/adma.202313098 ↗
49. Ding JM, de la Fuente Vornbrock A, Ting C, et al. Patternable polymer bulk heterojunction photovoltaic cells on plastic by rotogravure printing. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2009, 93: 459–46410.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.003 ↗
50. Voigt MM, Mackenzie RCI, Yau CP, et al. Gravure printing for three subsequent solar cell layers of inverted structures on flexible substrates. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2011, 95: 731–73410.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.013 ↗
51. Yang J, Vak D, Clark N, et al. Organic photovoltaic modules fabricated by an industrial gravure printing proofer. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2013, 109: 47–5510.1016/j.solmat.2012.10.018 ↗
52. Kapnopoulos C, Mekeridis ED, Tzounis L, et al. Fully gravure printed organic photovoltaic modules: A straightforward process with a high potential for large scale production. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2016, 144: 724–73110.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.021 ↗