Injectable and self-fused hydrogels with antifouling capability based on amino acid derivatives for postoperative anti-adhesion application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Hernia repair and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Mi Y, Yang F, Bloomquist C, et al. Biologically targeted photo-cross-linkable nanopatch to prevent postsurgical peritoneal adhesion. Adv Sci, 2019, 6: 190080910.1002/advs.201900809 ↗
2. Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E, et al. Adhesions after abdominal surgery: A systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surg Today, 2014, 44: 405–42010.1007/s00595-013-0591-8 ↗
3. ten Broek RPG, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJP, et al. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: Systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ, 2013, 347: f558810.1136/bmj.f5588 ↗
4. Yang Y, Zhao X, Yu J, et al. H-bonding supramolecular hydrogels with promising mechanical strength and shape memory properties for postoperative antiadhesion application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 34161–3416910.1021/acsami.0c07753 ↗
5. Zhou J, Zhang H, Fareed MS, et al. An injectable peptide hydrogel constructed of natural antimicrobial peptide J-1 and ADP shows anti-infection, hemostasis, and antiadhesion efficacy. ACS Nano, 2022, 16: 7636–765010.1021/acsnano.1c11206 ↗
6. Kheilnezhad B, Hadjizadeh A. A review: Progress in preventing tissue adhesions from a biomaterial perspective. Biomater Sci, 2021, 9: 2850–287310.1039/D0BM02023K ↗
7. Liao J, Li X, Fan Y. Prevention strategies of postoperative adhesion in soft tissues by applying biomaterials: Based on the mechanisms of occurrence and development of adhesions. Bioactive Mater, 2023, 26: 387–41210.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.026 ↗
8. Li J, Feng X, Liu B, et al. Polymer materials for prevention of post-operative adhesion. Acta Biomater, 2017, 61: 21–4010.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.002 ↗
9. Wu W, Cheng R, das Neves J, et al. Advances in biomaterials for preventing tissue adhesion. J Control Release, 2017, 261: 318–33610.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.020 ↗
10. Sikirica V, Bapat B, Candrilli SD, et al. The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US. BMC Surg, 2011, 11: 11–1310.1186/1471-2482-11-13 ↗
11. Lin XN, Zhou F, Wei ML, et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Fertility Sterility, 2015, 104: 235–24010.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.008 ↗
12. Watanabe J, Ishida F, Ishida H, et al. A prospective multi-center registry concerning the clinical performance of laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an absorbable adhesion barrier (INTERCEED*) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose. Surg Today, 2019, 49: 877–88410.1007/s00595-019-01816-7 ↗
13. Menzies D, Pascual MH, Walz MK, et al. Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: From the multicentre ariel registry. Annals, 2006, 88: 375–38210.1308/003588406X114730 ↗
14. Ruiz-Esparza GU, Wang X, Zhang X, et al. Nanoengineered shear-thinning hydrogel barrier for preventing postoperative abdominal adhesions. Nano-Micro Lett, 2021, 13: 21210.1007/s40820-021-00712-5 ↗
15. Zhao X, Yang J, Liu Y, et al. An injectable and antifouling self-fused supramolecular hydrogel for preventing postoperative and recurrent adhesions. Chem Eng J, 2021, 404: 12709610.1016/j.cej.2020.127096 ↗
16. Sultana T, Van Hai H, Abueva C, et al. TEMPO oxidized nano-cellulose containing thermo-responsive injectable hydrogel for post-surgical peritoneal tissue adhesion prevention. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2019, 102: 12–2110.1016/j.msec.2019.03.110 ↗
17. Wei CZ, Hou CL, Gu QS, et al. A thermosensitive chitosan-based hydrogel barrier for post-operative adhesions’ prevention. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 5534–554010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.084 ↗
18. Ito T, Yeo Y, Highley CB, et al. The prevention of peritoneal adhesions by in situ cross-linking hydrogels of hyaluronic acid and cellulose derivatives. Biomaterials, 2007, 28: 975–98310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.021 ↗
19. Zou Y, Yue P, Cao H, et al. Biocompatible and biodegradable chitin-based hydrogels crosslinked by BDDE with excellent mechanical properties for effective prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2023, 305: 12054310.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120543 ↗
20. Hu X, Vatankhah-Varnoosfaderani M, Zhou J, et al. Weak hydrogen bonding enables hard, strong, tough, and elastic hydrogels. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 6899–690510.1002/adma.201503724 ↗
21. Kang J, Son D, Wang GJN, et al. Tough and water-insensitive self-healing elastomer for robust electronic skin. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: e170684610.1002/adma.201706846 ↗
22. Yu J, Xu K, Chen X, et al. Highly stretchable, tough, resilient, and antifatigue hydrogels based on multiple hydrogen bonding interactions formed by phenylalanine derivatives. Biomacromolecules, 2021, 22: 1297–130410.1021/acs.biomac.0c01788 ↗
23. Gao F, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Sea cucumber-inspired autolytic hydrogels exhibiting tunable high mechanical performances, repairability, and reusability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 8956–896610.1021/acsami.6b00912 ↗
24. Zhang D, Chen Q, Bi Y, et al. Bio-inspired poly-DL-serine materials resist the foreign-body response. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 532710.1038/s41467-021-25581-9 ↗
25. Zhang D, Chen Q, Zhang W, et al. Silk-inspired β-peptide materials resist fouling and the foreign-body response. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59: 9586–959310.1002/anie.202000416 ↗
26. Zhang XN, Du C, Wang YJ, et al. Influence of the α-methyl group on elastic-to-glassy transition of supramolecular hydrogels with hydrogen-bond associations. Macromolecules, 2022, 55: 7512–752510.1021/acs.macromol.2c00829 ↗
27. Zhang HJ, Wang X, Yang Y, et al. Effect of hydrophobic side group on structural heterogeneities and mechanical performance of gelatin-based hydrogen-bonded hydrogel. Macromolecules, 2022, 55: 7401–741010.1021/acs.macromol.2c01386 ↗
28. Dai X, Zhang Y, Gao L, et al. A mechanically strong, highly stable, thermoplastic, and self-healable supramolecular polymer hydrogel. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 3566–357110.1002/adma.201500534 ↗
29. Ren Y, Zhang Y, Sun W, et al. Methyl matters: An autonomic rapid self-healing supramolecular poly(N-methacryloyl glycinamide) hydrogel. Polymer, 2017, 126: 1–810.1016/j.polymer.2017.08.016 ↗
30. Yu J, Wang K, Fan C, et al. An ultrasoft self-fused supramolecular polymer hydrogel for completely preventing postoperative tissue adhesion. Adv Mater, 2021, 33: e200839510.1002/adma.202008395 ↗
31. Yu J, Qin Y, Yang Y, et al. Robust hydrogel adhesives for emergency rescue and gastric perforation repair. Bioactive Mater, 2023, 19: 703–71610.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.010 ↗
32. Gao J, Wen J, Hu D, et al. Bottlebrush inspired injectable hydrogel for rapid prevention of postoperative and recurrent adhesion. Bioactive Mater, 2022, 16: 27–4610.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.015 ↗
33. Cui C, Wu T, Gao F, et al. An autolytic high strength instant adhesive hydrogel for emergency self-rescue. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 180492510.1002/adfm.201804925 ↗
34. Zhang M, Yu J, Shen K, et al. Highly stretchable nanocomposite hydrogels with outstanding antifatigue fracture based on robust non-covalent interactions for wound healing. Chem Mater, 2021, 33: 6453–646310.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01790 ↗
35. Feng Z, Zuo H, Gao W, et al. A robust, self-healable, and shape memory supramolecular hydrogel by multiple hydrogen bonding interactions. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2018, 39: e180013810.1002/marc.201800138 ↗
36. Chen M, Inglefield DL, Zhang K, et al. Synthesis of urea-containing ABA triblock copolymers: Influence of pendant hydrogen bonding on morphology and thermomechanical properties. J Polym Sci Part A-Polym Chem, 2018, 56: 1844–185210.1002/pola.29066 ↗
37. Xu L, Gao S, Guo Q, et al. A solvent-exchange strategy to regulate noncovalent interactions for strong and antiswelling hydrogels. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: e200457910.1002/adma.202004579 ↗
38. Zhang H, Tang N, Yu X, et al. Strong and tough physical eutectogels regulated by the spatiotemporal expression of non-covalent interactions. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 220630510.1002/adfm.202206305 ↗
39. Zhang M, Yang Y, Li M, et al. Toughening double-network hydrogels by polyelectrolytes. Adv Mater, 2023, 35: e230155110.1002/adma.202301551 ↗
40. Emamian S, Lu T, Kruse H, et al. Exploring nature and predicting strength of hydrogen bonds: A correlation analysis between atoms-in-molecules descriptors, binding energies, and energy components of symmetry-adapted perturbation theory. J Comput Chem, 2019, 40: 2868–288110.1002/jcc.26068 ↗
41. Gerasymchuk Y, Guzik M, Jański J, et al. Comparison of ab initio HF and DFT calculations of the structure and spectroscopy of two dimeric systems of chloro Yb(III) mono-phthalocyanine in polymeric lattice. Optical Mater, 2020, 108: 11015310.1016/j.optmat.2020.110153 ↗
42. Liu B, Kong Y, Alimi OA, et al. Multifunctional microgel-based cream hydrogels for postoperative abdominal adhesion prevention. ACS Nano, 2023, 17: 3847–386410.1021/acsnano.2c12104 ↗
43. Wan Z, He J, Yang Y, et al. Injectable adhesive self-healing biocompatible hydrogel for haemostasis, wound healing, and postoperative tissue adhesion prevention in nephron-sparing surgery. Acta Biomater, 2022, 152: 157–17010.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.006 ↗
44. Guo Q, Sun H, Wu X, et al. In situ clickable purely zwitterionic hydrogel for peritoneal adhesion prevention. Chem Mater, 2020, 32: 6347–635710.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00889 ↗
45. Li S, Wang L, Zheng W, et al. Rapid fabrication of self-healing, conductive, and injectable gel as dressings for healing wounds in stretchable parts of the body. Adv Funct Mater, 2020, 30: 200237010.1002/adfm.202002370 ↗
46. Hu T, Wu GP, Bu H, et al. An injectable, adhesive, and self-healable composite hydrogel wound dressing with excellent antibacterial activity. Chem Eng J, 2022, 450: 13820110.1016/j.cej.2022.138201 ↗
47. Lih E, Lee JS, Park KM, et al. Rapidly curable chitosan–PEG hydrogels as tissue adhesives for hemostasis and wound healing. Acta Biomater, 2012, 8: 3261–326910.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.001 ↗
48. Wang L, Gao G, Zhou Y, et al. Tough, adhesive, self-healable, and transparent ionically conductive zwitterionic nanocomposite hydrogels as skin strain sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 3506–351510.1021/acsami.8b20755 ↗
49. Zhang M, Lin P, Song X, et al. Injectable and self-healing hydrogels with tissue adhesiveness and antibacterial activity as wound dressings for infected wound healing. J Polym Sci, 2022, 60: 1511–152010.1002/pol.20210896 ↗
50. Li X, Zou B, Zhao N, et al. Potent anti-adhesion barrier combined biodegradable hydrogel with multifunctional turkish galls extract. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 24469–2447910.1021/acsami.8b10668 ↗
51. Kosaka H, Yoshimoto T, Yoshimoto T, et al. Interferon-γ is a therapeutic target molecule for prevention of postoperative adhesion formation. Nat Med, 2008, 14: 437–44110.1038/nm1733 ↗
52. Li Z, Liu L, Chen Y. Dual dynamically crosslinked thermosensitive hydrogel with self-fixing as a postoperative anti-adhesion barrier. Acta Biomater, 2020, 110: 119–12810.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.034 ↗
53. Feng B, Wang S, Hu D, et al. Bioresorbable electrospun gelatin/polycaprolactone nanofibrous membrane as a barrier to prevent cardiac postoperative adhesion. Acta Biomater, 2019, 83: 211–22010.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.022 ↗
54. He J, Zhang Z, Yang Y, et al. Injectable self-healing adhesive pH-responsive hydrogels accelerate gastric hemostasis and wound healing. Nano-Micro Lett, 2021, 13: 8010.1007/s40820-020-00585-0 ↗
55. Li M, Liang Y, Liang Y, et al. Injectable stretchable self-healing dual dynamic network hydrogel as adhesive anti-oxidant wound dressing for photothermal clearance of bacteria and promoting wound healing of MRSA infected motion wounds. Chem Eng J, 2022, 427: 13203910.1016/j.cej.2021.132039 ↗
56. Tang J, Xiang Z, Bernards MT, et al. Peritoneal adhesions: Occurrence, prevention and experimental models. Acta Biomater, 2020, 116: 84–10410.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.036 ↗
57. Zeng H, Liu X, Zhang Z, et al. Self-healing, injectable hydrogel based on dual dynamic covalent cross-linking against postoperative abdominal cavity adhesion. Acta Biomater, 2022, 151: 210–22210.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.030 ↗
58. Du J, Wang F, Li J, et al. Green polymer hydrogels from a natural monomer with inherent antioxidative capability for efficient wound healing and spinal cord injury treatment. Biomater Sci, 2023, 11: 3683–369410.1039/D3BM00174A ↗
59. Hu W, Zhang Z, Lu S, et al. Assembled anti-adhesion polypropylene mesh with self-fixable and degradable in situ mussel-inspired hydrogel coating for abdominal wall defect repair. Biomater Sci, 2018, 6: 3030–304110.1039/C8BM00824H ↗
60. Zhao X, Pei D, Yang Y, et al. Green tea derivative driven smart hydrogels with desired functions for chronic diabetic wound treatment. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 200944210.1002/adfm.202009442 ↗