Entropy-driven strand displacement reaction for ultrasensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA based on upconversion and Fe3O4 nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Early detection of cancer biomarkers applied in real-time disease diagnosis and therapies can increase the survival rate of patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a typical cancer biomarker plays a great role in the process of tumor disease monitoring, especially in early diagnosis. Unfortunately, most ctDNA detection systems have not been widely used due to their low sensitivity, poor specificity, and high cost. Herein, we developed an alternative ctDNA detection system to present the levels of ctDNA by recording the fluorescence signals of the system containing upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), Fe3O4, and entropy-driven strand displacement reaction. The method has a practical sensitivity with a wide linear range from 100 amol L−1 to 1 nmol L−1 and a low detection limit of 1.6 amol L−1. Furthermore, the system demonstrates a practical application in mouse blood serum samples and meets the requirements for rapid, sensitive, specific, and economical diagnosis of cancers. Thus, this ctDNA detection system may have great potential for ctDNA detection and clinical diagnosis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Cohen JD, Javed AA, Thoburn C, et al. Combined circulating tumor DNA and protein biomarker-based liquid biopsy for the earlier detection of pancreatic cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114: 10202–1020710.1073/pnas.1704961114 ↗
2. Wan JCM, Massie C, Garcia-Corbacho J, et al. Liquid biopsies come of age: Towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA. Nat Rev Cancer, 2017, 17: 223–23810.1038/nrc.2017.7 ↗
3. Agashe R, Kurzrock R. Circulating tumor cells: from the laboratory to the cancer clinic. Cancers, 2020, 12: 236110.3390/cancers12092361 ↗
4. Chabon JJ, Simmons AD, Lovejoy AF, et al. Circulating tumour DNA profiling reveals heterogeneity of EGFR inhibitor resistance mechanisms in lung cancer patients. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 1181510.1038/ncomms11815 ↗
5. Moss EL, Gorsia DN, Collins A, et al. Utility of circulating tumor DNA for detection and monitoring of endometrial cancer recurrence and progression. Cancers, 2020, 12: 223110.3390/cancers12082231 ↗
6. André F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380: 1929–194010.1056/NEJMoa1813904 ↗
7. Juric D, Janku F, Rodón J, et al. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant in PIK3CA-altered and PIK3CA-wild-type estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5: e18447510.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4475 ↗
8. Noorolyai S, Shajari N, Baghbani E, et al. The relation between PI3K/AKT signalling pathway and cancer. Gene, 2019, 698: 120–12810.1016/j.gene.2019.02.076 ↗
9. Ebrahimi SB, Samanta D, Mirkin CA. DNA-based nanostructures for live-cell analysis. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 11343–1135610.1021/jacs.0c04978 ↗
10. Heitzer E, Ulz P, Geigl JB. Circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy for cancer. Clin Chem, 2015, 61: 112–12310.1373/clinchem.2014.222679 ↗
11. Olsson E, Winter C, George A, et al. Serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with primary breast cancer for detection of occult metastatic disease. EMBO Mol Med, 2015, 7: 1034–104710.15252/emmm.201404913 ↗
12. Siravegna G, Marsoni S, Siena S, et al. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2017, 14: 531–54810.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14 ↗
13. Thress KS, Brant R, Carr TH, et al. EGFR mutation detection in ctDNA from NSCLC patient plasma: A cross-platform comparison of leading technologies to support the clinical development of AZD9291. Lung Cancer, 2015, 90: 509–51510.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.004 ↗
14. Bo B, Zhang T, Jiang Y, et al. Triple signal amplification strategy for ultrasensitive determination of miRNA based on duplex specific nuclease and bridge DNA-gold nanoparticles. Anal Chem, 2018, 90: 2395–240010.1021/acs.analchem.7b05447 ↗
15. Chai H, Cheng W, Xu L, et al. Fabrication of polymeric ferrocene nanoparticles for electrochemical aptasensing of protein with target-catalyzed hairpin assembly. Anal Chem, 2019, 91: 9940–994510.1021/acs.analchem.9b01673 ↗
16. Chai H, Miao P. Bipedal DNA walker based electrochemical genosensing strategy. Anal Chem, 2019, 91: 4953–495710.1021/acs.analchem.9b01118 ↗
17. Chen X, Tang Y, Yan R, et al. Ultrasensitive detection of ctDNA by target-mediated in situ growth of DNA three-way junction on the electrode. ChemElectroChem, 2019, 7: 64–6810.1002/celc.201901657 ↗
18. Dong Q, Liu Q, Guo L, et al. A signal-flexible gene diagnostic strategy coupling loop-mediated isothermal amplification with hybridization chain reaction. Anal Chim Acta, 2019, 1079: 171–17910.1016/j.aca.2019.06.048 ↗
19. Liu L, Zhang H, Wang Z, et al. Peptide-functionalized upconversion nanoparticles-based FRET sensing platform for Caspase-9 activity detection in vitro and in vivo. Biosens Bioelectron, 2019, 141: 11140310.1016/j.bios.2019.111403 ↗
20. Tadimety A, Zhang Y, Kready KM, et al. Design of peptide nucleic acid probes on plasmonic gold nanorods for detection of circulating tumor DNA point mutations. Biosens Bioelectron, 2019, 130: 236–24410.1016/j.bios.2019.01.045 ↗
21. Thomas RK, Sukumaran S, Sudarsanakumar C. An insight into the comparative binding affinities of chlorogenic acid functionalized gold and silver nanoparticles with ctDNA along with its cytotoxicity analysis. J Mol Liquids, 2019, 287: 11091110.1016/j.molliq.2019.110911 ↗
22. Gu T, Li Z, Ren Z, et al. Rare-earth-doped upconversion nanocrystals embedded mesoporous silica nanoparticles for multiple microRNA detection. Chem Eng J, 2019, 374: 863–86910.1016/j.cej.2019.05.223 ↗
23. Hu P, Zhang S, Wu T, et al. Fe-Au nanoparticle-coupling for ultrasensitive detections of circulating tumor DNA. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 180169010.1002/adma.201801690 ↗
24. Jiang Y, Tang Y, Miao P. Polydopamine nanosphere@silver nanoclusters for fluorescence detection of multiplex tumor markers. Nanoscale, 2019, 11: 8119–812310.1039/C9NR01307E ↗
25. Jo EJ, Byun JY, Mun H, et al. Single-step LRET aptasensor for rapid mycotoxin detection. Anal Chem, 2018, 90: 716–72210.1021/acs.analchem.7b02368 ↗
26. Li B, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. Construction of dual-color probes with target-triggered signal amplification for in situ single-molecule imaging of microRNA. ACS Nano, 2020, 14: 8116–812510.1021/acsnano.0c01061 ↗
27. Mao X, Pan S, Zhou D, et al. Fabrication of DNAzyme-functionalized hydrogel and its application for visible detection of circulating tumor DNA. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2019, 285: 385–39010.1016/j.snb.2019.01.076 ↗
28. Savli H, Sertdemir N, Aydin D, et al. TP53, EGFR and PIK3CA gene variations observed as prominent biomarkers in breast and lung cancer by plasma cell-free DNA genomic testing. J Biotech, 2019, 300: 87–9310.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.05.005 ↗
29. Sun Y, Zhao C, Yan Z, et al. Simple and sensitive microbial pathogen detection using a label-free DNA amplification assay. Chem Commun, 2016, 52: 7505–750810.1039/C6CC02672A ↗
30. Uhd J, Miotke L, Ji HP, et al. Ultra-fast detection and quantification of nucleic acids by amplification-free fluorescence assay. Analyst, 2020, 145: 5836–584410.1039/D0AN00676A ↗
31. Ali M, Sajid M, Khalid MAU, et al. A fluorescent lateral flow biosensor for the quantitative detection of Vaspin using upconverting nanoparticles. Spectrochim Acta Part A-Mol Biomol Spectr, 2020, 226: 11761010.1016/j.saa.2019.117610 ↗
32. Zhang N, Shi XM, Guo HQ, et al. Gold nanoparticle couples with entropy-driven toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement reaction on magnetic beads: Toward ultrasensitive energy-transfer-based photoelectrochemical detection of miRNA-141 in real blood sample. Anal Chem, 2018, 90: 11892–1189810.1021/acs.analchem.8b01966 ↗
33. Gao R, Hao C, Xu L, et al. Spiny nanorod and upconversion nanoparticle satellite assemblies for ultrasensitive detection of messenger RNA in living cells. Anal Chem, 2018, 90: 5414–542110.1021/acs.analchem.8b00617 ↗
34. Ghosh S, Chang YF, Yang DM, et al. Upconversion nanoparticlemOrange protein FRET nanoprobes for self-ratiometric/ratiometric determination of intracellular pH, and single cell pH imaging. Biosens Bioelectron, 2020, 155: 11211510.1016/j.bios.2020.112115 ↗
35. Li H, Wang X, Ohulchanskyy TY, et al. Lanthanide-doped nearinfrared nanoparticles for biophotonics. Adv Mater, 2021, 33: 200067810.1002/adma.202000678 ↗
36. Law GL, Wong KL, Lau KK, et al. Nonlinear optical activity in dipolar organic-lanthanide complexes. J Mater Chem, 2010, 20: 4074–407910.1039/b926376d ↗
37. Law GL, Wong KL, Zhou X, et al. Crystal structure and luminescence of lanthanide monodentate complexes [Ln(C4N4H6O)2-(H2O)6]Cl3 and [Ln(C4N4H6O)2(H2O)3(NO3)3] (Ln = Tb or Eu). Inorg Chem, 2005, 44: 4142–414410.1021/ic050115+ ↗
38. Liu B, Deng X, Xie Z, et al. Thiol-ene click reaction as a facile and general approach for surface functionalization of colloidal nanocrystals. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 160487810.1002/adma.201604878 ↗
39. Zhang R, Liang L, Meng Q, et al. Responsive upconversion nanoprobe for background-free hypochlorous acid detection and bioimaging. Small, 2018, 15: 180371210.1002/smll.201803712 ↗