TiO2-induced electronic change in traditional La0.5Sr0.5MnO3−δ cathode allows high performance of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells
Source abstract
Abstract
作为固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC)最成功的阴极材料之一, Sr掺 杂的LaMnO3材料在高温下表现良好. 但其阴极活性随着工作温度的降 低而剧烈下降, 不适用于中温SOFC. 本工作通过TiO2修饰传统 La0.5Sr0.5MnO3−δ (LSM)阴极形成LSM + TiO2阴极. TiO2可以改变LSM/ TiO2界面的电子结构, 使得界面处氧原子发生电荷积聚, 促进了氧空位 的形成, 从而提升了氧扩散能力. 使用LSM + TiO2阴极的质子导体 SOFC (H-SOFC)的性能要明显高于单独使用LSM或者TiO2阴极的性 能, 证明了LSM和TiO2的协同效应. 使用LSM + TiO2阴极的H-SOFC单 电池性能在700°C时达到1118 mW cm−2, 是使用LSM基阴极的H-SOFC 单电池性能的最高值. 此外, LSM + TiO2对CO2和水蒸汽具有良好的稳 定性, 使其在工作中表现出良好的稳定性. LSM + TiO2阴极的使用解决 了传统LSM阴极在H-SOFC中性能较差的问题, 同时保持了LSM基材料 良好的稳定性.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhuang Z, Li Y, Yu R, et al. Reversely trapping atoms from a perovskite surface for high-performance and durable fuel cell cathodes. Nat Catal, 2022, 5: 300–31010.1038/s41929-022-00764-9 ↗
2. Zhang Y, Chen B, Guan D, et al. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. Nature, 2021, 591: 246–25110.1038/s41586-021-03264-1 ↗
3. Xi X, Liu J, Luo W, et al. Unraveling the enhanced kinetics of Sr2Fe1+xMo1−xO6−δ electrocatalysts for high-performance solid oxide cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2021, 11: 210284510.1002/aenm.202102845 ↗
4. Duan C, Kee RJ, Zhu H, et al. Highly durable, coking and sulfur tolerant, fuel-flexible protonic ceramic fuel cells. Nature, 2018, 557: 217–22210.1038/s41586-018-0082-6 ↗
5. Chen D, Guan Z, Zhang D, et al. Constructing a pathway for mixed ion and electron transfer reactions for O2 incorporation in Pr0.1Ce0.9O2−x. Nat Catal, 2020, 3: 116–12410.1038/s41929-019-0401-9 ↗
6. Xie D, Li K, Yang J, et al. High-performance La0.5(Ba0.75Ca0.25)0.5Co0.8-Fe0.2O3−δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 10007–1001410.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.014 ↗
7. Graves C, Ebbesen SD, Jensen SH, et al. Eliminating degradation in solid oxide electrochemical cells by reversible operation. Nat Mater, 2015, 14: 239–24410.1038/nmat4165 ↗
8. Painter AS, Huang YL, Wachsman ED. Durability of (La0.8Sr0.2)0.95-MnO3−δ-(Er0.2Bi0.8)2O3 composite cathodes for low temperature SOFCs. J Power Sources, 2017, 360: 391–39810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.018 ↗
9. Wachsman E, Ishihara T, Kilner J. Low-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. MRS Bull, 2014, 39: 773–77910.1557/mrs.2014.192 ↗
10. Wei T, Qiu P, Yang J, et al. High-performance direct carbon dioxide-methane solid oxide fuel cell with a structure-engineered double-layer anode. J Power Sources, 2021, 484: 22919910.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229199 ↗
11. Zhang L, Yin Y, Xu Y, et al. Tailoring Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−δ with Sc as a new single-phase cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater, 2022, 65: 1485–149410.1007/s40843-021-1935-5 ↗
12. Cao D, Zhou M, Yan X, et al. High performance low-temperature tubular protonic ceramic fuel cells based on barium cerate-zirconate electrolyte. Electrochem Commun, 2021, 125: 10698610.1016/j.elecom.2021.106986 ↗
13. Wang M, Su C, Zhu Z, et al. Composite cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells: Rationales and materials. Compos Part B-Eng, 2022, 238: 10988110.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109881 ↗
14. Ding H, Wu W, Jiang C, et al. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 190710.1038/s41467-020-15677-z ↗
15. Zvonareva IA, Mineev AM, Tarasova NA, et al. High-temperature transport properties of BaSn1−xScxO3−δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Adv Ceram, 2022, 11: 1131–114310.1007/s40145-022-0599-x ↗
16. Zvonareva I, Fu XZ, Medvedev D, et al. Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic-electronic electrolytes. Energy Environ Sci, 2022, 15: 439–46510.1039/D1EE03109K ↗
17. Chen M, Zhao K, Zhao J, et al. Accelerated kinetics of hydrogen oxidation reaction on the Ni anode coupled with BaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ proton-conducting ceramic electrolyte via tuning the electrolyte surface chemistry. Appl Surf Sci, 2022, 605: 15480010.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154800 ↗
18. Yin Y, Zhou Y, Gu Y, et al. Successful preparation of BaCo0.5Fe0.5O3−δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceramics, 2023, 12: 587–59710.26599/JAC.2023.9220707 ↗
19. Xu Y, Yu S, Yin Y, et al. Taking advantage of Li-evaporation in LiCoO2 as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram, 2022, 11: 1849–185910.1007/s40145-022-0651-x ↗
20. Zhang Y, Knibbe R, Sunarso J, et al. Recent progress on advanced materials for solid-oxide fuel cells operating below 500°C. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 170013210.1002/adma.201700132 ↗
21. He F, Gao Q, Liu Z, et al. A new Pd doped proton conducting per-ovskite oxide with multiple functionalities for efficient and stable power generation from ammonia at reduced temperatures. Adv Energy Mater, 2021, 11: 200391610.1002/aenm.202003916 ↗
22. Song Y, Chen Y, Wang W, et al. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. Joule, 2019, 3: 2842–285310.1016/j.joule.2019.07.004 ↗
23. Chen M, Cheng Y, He S, et al. Active, durable bismuth oxide-manganite composite oxygen electrodes: Interface formation induced by cathodic polarization. J Power Sources, 2018, 397: 16–2410.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.012 ↗
24. Zhang X, Liu L, Zhao Z, et al. Enhanced oxygen reduction activity and solid oxide fuel cell performance with a nanoparticles-loaded cathode. Nano Lett, 2015, 15: 1703–170910.1021/nl5043566 ↗
25. Lee KT, Lidie AA, Yoon HS, et al. Rational design of lower-temperature solid oxide fuel cell cathodes via nanotailoring of co-assembled composite structures. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 13463–1346710.1002/anie.201408210 ↗
26. Da’as EH, Bi L, Boulfrad S, et al. Nanostructuring the electronic conducting La0.8Sr0.2MnO3−δ cathode for high-performance in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells below 600°C. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 57–6410.1007/s40843-017-9125-1 ↗
27. Peng C, Melnik J, Li J, et al. ZnO-doped BaZr0.85Y0.15O3−δ proton-conducting electrolytes: Characterization and fabrication ofthin films. J Power Sources, 2009, 190: 447–45210.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.020 ↗
28. Dai H, Yin Y, Li X, et al. A new Sc-doped La0.5Sr0.5MnO3−δ cathode allows high performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustain Mater Technologies, 2022, 32: e0040910.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00409 ↗
29. Yin Y, Yu S, Dai H, et al. Triggering interfacial activity of the traditional La0.5Sr0.5MnO3 cathode with Co-doping for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A, 2022, 10: 1726–173410.1039/D1TA09450E ↗
30. Wang B, Liu X, Bi L, et al. Fabrication of high-performance proton-conducting electrolytes from microwave prepared ultrafine powders for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2019, 412: 664–66910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.051 ↗
31. Xu Y, Xu X, Bi L. A high-entropy spinel ceramic oxide as the cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram, 2022, 11: 794–80410.1007/s40145-022-0573-7 ↗
32. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
33. Yang X, Yin Y, Yu S, et al. Gluing Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ with Co3O4 as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater, 2023, 66: 955–96310.1007/s40843-022-2240-y ↗
34. Zhang X, Pei C, Chang X, et al. FeO6 octahedral distortion activates lattice oxygen in perovskite ferrite for methane partial oxidation coupled with CO2 splitting. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 11540–1154910.1021/jacs.0c04643 ↗
35. Yin Y, Dai H, Yu S, et al. Tailoring cobalt-free La0.5Sr0.5FeO3−δ cathode with a nonmetal cation-doping strategy for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. SusMat, 2022, 2: 607–61610.1002/sus2.79 ↗
36. Xu X, Xu Y, Ma J, et al. Tailoring electronic structure of perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J Power Sources, 2021, 489: 22948610.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229486 ↗
37. Chen C, Wang XT, Zhong JH, et al. Epitaxially grown heterostructured SrMn3O6−x-SrMnO3 with high-valence Mn3+/4+ for improved oxygen reduction catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60: 22043–2205010.1002/anie.202109207 ↗
38. Hwang J, Rao RR, Giordano L, et al. Perovskites in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Science, 2017, 358: 751–75610.1126/science.aam7092 ↗
39. Qiu P, Liu B, Wu L, et al. K-doped BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.2O3−δ as a promising cathode material for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Adv Ceram, 2022, 11: 1988–200010.1007/s40145-022-0662-7 ↗
40. Hu B, Wang Y, Zhu Z, et al. Measuring oxygen surface exchange kinetics on mixed-conducting composites by electrical conductivity relaxation. J Mater Chem A, 2015, 3: 10296–1030210.1039/C5TA00510H ↗
41. Hu B, Wang Y, Xia C. Oxygen incorporation at the three-phase boundary of LSCF-SDC composite. J Power Sources, 2014, 269: 180–18810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.164 ↗
42. Wang N, Hinokuma S, Ina T, et al. Mixed proton-electron-oxide ion triple conducting manganite as an efficient cobalt-free cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Mater Chem A, 2020, 8: 11043–1105510.1039/D0TA03899G ↗
43. Ren R, Wang Z, Meng X, et al. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2020, 3: 4914–492210.1021/acsaem.0c00486 ↗
44. Wu S, Xu X, Li X, et al. High-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells using the first-generation Sr-doped LaMnO3 cathode tailored with Zn ions. Sci China Mater, 2022, 65: 675–68210.1007/s40843-021-1821-4 ↗
45. Niu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang W, et al. Highly active and durable air electrodes for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells enabled by an efficient bifunctional catalyst. Adv Energy Mater, 2022, 12: 210378310.1002/aenm.202103783 ↗
46. Wang Q, Hou J, Fan Y, et al. Pr2BaNiMnO7−δ double-layered Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite oxides as efficient cathode electrocatalysts for low temperature proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A, 2020, 8: 7704–771210.1039/C9TA11212J ↗
47. Peng C, Wei P, Li X, et al. High efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen production over ternary Cu/TiO2@Ti3C2Tx enabled by low-work-function 2D titanium carbide. Nano Energy, 2018, 53: 97–10710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.040 ↗
48. Xie H, Li N, Chen X, et al. Surface oxygen vacancies promoted photodegradation of benzene on TiO2 film. Appl Surf Sci, 2020, 511: 14559710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145597 ↗
49. Lim DK, Im HN, Singh B, et al. Investigations on electrochemical performance of a proton-conducting ceramic-electrolyte fuel cell with La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 cathode. J Electrochem Soc, 2015, 162: F547–F55410.1149/2.0551506jes ↗
50. Parbey J, Wang Q, Lei J, et al. High-performance solid oxide fuel cells with fiber-based cathodes for low-temperature operation. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45: 6949–695710.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.125 ↗
51. Dai H, Xu X, Liu C, et al. Tailoring a LaMnO3 cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: Integration of high performance and excellent stability. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9: 12553–1255910.1039/D1TA01221E ↗
52. Wang L, Gu Y, Dai H, et al. Sr and Fe co-doped Ba2In2O5 as a new proton-conductor-derived cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Eur Ceramic Soc, 2023, 43: 4573–457910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.03.035 ↗
53. Zhou R, Yin Y, Dai H, et al. Attempted preparation of La0.5Ba0.5MnO3−δ leading to an in-situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceramics, 2023, 12: 1189–120010.26599/JAC.2023.9220748 ↗