Reconfiguring hydration shells by rigidly confined interaction within graphene oxide membranes for ultra-efficient anion separation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Graphene research and applications · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Xie X, Chen C, Zhang N, et al. Microstructure and surface control of MXene films for water purification. Nat Sustain, 2019, 2: 856–86210.1038/s41893-019-0373-4 ↗
2. Zhao C, Zhang Y, Jia Y, et al. Polyamide membranes with nanoscale ordered structures for fast permeation and highly selective ion-ion separation. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 111210.1038/s41467-023-36848-8 ↗
3. Uliana AA, Bui NT, Kamcev J, et al. Ion-capture electrodialysis using multifunctional adsorptive membranes. Science, 2021, 372: 296–29910.1126/science.abf5991 ↗
4. Lin J, Ye W, Xie S, et al. Shielding effect enables fast ion transfer through nanoporous membrane for highly energy-efficient electro-dialysis. Nat Water, 2023, 1: 725–73510.1038/s44221-023-00113-5 ↗
5. Zhang Y, Luo T, Yang X, et al. Superior diffusion dialysis anion exchange membranes from miscible polyether sulfone-poly(vinyl pyrrolidone-co-styrene) blends. J Membrane Sci, 2023, 680: 12170410.1016/j.memsci.2023.121704 ↗
6. Xie L, Tang J, Qin R, et al. Surface charge modification on 2D nanofluidic membrane for regulating ion transport. Adv Funct Mater, 2023, 33: 220895910.1002/adfm.202208959 ↗
7. Wang S, Yang L, He G, et al. Two-dimensional nanochannel membranes for molecular and ionic separations. Chem Soc Rev, 2020, 49: 1071–108910.1039/C9CS00751B ↗
8. Wang Y, Su Y, Zhang H, et al. Highly stable two-dimensional AgCrSe2 membranes reinforced by polydopamine for contaminated water purification. Sci China Mater, 2024, 67: 2225–223110.1007/s40843-024-2889-6 ↗
9. Lu J, Wang H. Emerging porous framework material-based nanofluidic membranes toward ultimate ion separation. Matter, 2021, 4: 2810–283010.1016/j.matt.2021.06.045 ↗
10. Zhang Y, Lin Y, Gan N, et al. Angstrom-scale channels with versatile ion-membrane interactions enabling precise ion separation via electrodialysis. AIChE J, 2024, 70: e1851910.1002/aic.18519 ↗
11. Liu G, Jin W. Graphene oxide membrane for molecular separation: challenges and opportunities. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 1021–102610.1007/s40843-018-9276-8 ↗
12. Wang W, Onofrio N, Petit E, et al. High-surface-area functionalized nanolaminated membranes for energy-efficient nanofiltration and desalination in forward osmosis. Nat Water, 2023, 1: 187–19710.1038/s44221-023-00036-1 ↗
13. Zhang M, Zhao P, Li P, et al. Designing biomimic two-dimensional ionic transport channels for efficient ion sieving. ACS Nano, 2021, 15: 5209–522010.1021/acsnano.0c10451 ↗
14. Qian Y, Shang J, Liu D, et al. Enhanced ion sieving of graphene oxide membranes via surface amine functionalization. J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143: 5080–509010.1021/jacs.1c00575 ↗
15. Lu Z, Wu Y, Ding L, et al. A lamellar MXene (Ti3C2Tx)/PSS composite membrane for fast and selective lithium-ion separation. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60: 22265–2226910.1002/anie.202108801 ↗
16. Xu R, Kang Y, Zhang W, et al. Two-dimensional MXene membranes with biomimetic sub-nanochannels for enhanced cation sieving. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 490710.1038/s41467-023-40742-8 ↗
17. Liu K, Epsztein R, Lin S, et al. Ion–ion selectivity of synthetic membranes with confined nanostructures. ACS Nano, 2024, 18: 21633–2165010.1021/acsnano.4c00540 ↗
18. Kang Y, Hu T, Wang Y, et al. Nanoconfinement enabled non-covalently decorated MXene membranes for ion-sieving. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 407510.1038/s41467-023-39533-y ↗
19. Zhu J, Wang L, Wang J, et al. Precisely tunable ion sieving with an Al13–Ti3C2Tx lamellar membrane by controlling interlayer spacing. ACS Nano, 2020, 14: 15306–1531610.1021/acsnano.0c05649 ↗
20. Wang Y, Wu N, Wang Y, et al. Graphite phase carbon nitride based membrane for selective permeation. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 250010.1038/s41467-019-10381-z ↗
21. Wang J, Zhang Z, Zhu J, et al. Ion sieving by a two-dimensional Ti3C2Tx alginate lamellar membrane with stable interlayer spacing. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 354010.1038/s41467-020-17373-4 ↗
22. Wu T, Wang Z, Lu Y, et al. Graphene oxide membranes for tunable ion sieving in acidic radioactive waste. Adv Sci, 2021, 8: 200271710.1002/advs.202002717 ↗
23. Huang G, Ghalei B, Pournaghshband Isfahani A, et al. Overcoming humidity-induced swelling of graphene oxide-based hydrogen membranes using charge-compensating nanodiamonds. Nat Energy, 2021, 6: 1176–118710.1038/s41560-021-00946-y ↗
24. Goutham S, Keerthi A, Ismail A, et al. Beyond steric selectivity of ions using ångström-scale capillaries. Nat Nanotechnol, 2023, 18: 596–60110.1038/s41565-023-01337-y ↗
25. Yu YZ, Fan JC, Esfandiar A, et al. Charge asymmetry effect in ion transport through angstrom-scale channels. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123: 1462–146910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09742 ↗
26. Muñoz-Santiburcio D, Marx D. Confinement-controlled aqueous chemistry within nanometric slit pores. Chem Rev, 2021, 121: 6293–632010.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01292 ↗
27. Yoo MJ, Park HB. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on properties of graphene oxide in Hummers method. Carbon, 2019, 141: 515–52210.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.009 ↗
28. Zhao C, Zhang P, Zhou J, et al. Layered nanocomposites by shear-flow-induced alignment of nanosheets. Nature, 2020, 580: 210–21510.1038/s41586-020-2161-8 ↗
29. Wang J, Cui Z, Li S, et al. Unlocking osmotic energy harvesting potential in challenging real-world hypersaline environments through vermiculite-based hetero-nanochannels. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 60810.1038/s41467-023-44434-1 ↗
30. Wu J, Liao C, Li T, et al. Metal-coordinated polybenzimidazole membranes with preferential K+ transport. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 114910.1038/s41467-023-36711-w ↗
31. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics, 1996, 14: 33–3810.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
32. Giannozzi P, Baroni S, Bonini N, et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys-Condens Matter, 2009, 21: 39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
33. Grimme S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comput Chem, 2006, 27: 1787–179910.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
34. Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX, 2015, 1–2: 19–2510.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
35. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, et al. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theor Comput, 2008, 4: 435–44710.1021/ct700301q ↗
36. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc, 1996, 118: 11225–1123610.1021/ja9621760 ↗
37. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, et al. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B, 2001, 105: 6474–648710.1021/jp003919d ↗
38. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys, 1983, 79: 926–93510.1063/1.445869 ↗
39. Dodda LS, Cabeza de Vaca I, Tirado-Rives J, et al. LigParGen web server: an automatic OPLS-AA parameter generator for organic ligands. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017, 45: W331–W33610.1093/nar/gkx312 ↗
40. Jensen KP, Jorgensen WL. Halide, ammonium, and alkali metal ion parameters for modeling aqueous solutions. J Chem Theor Comput, 2006, 2: 1499–150910.1021/ct600252r ↗
41. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys, 1995, 103: 8577–859310.1063/1.470117 ↗
42. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, et al. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem, 1997, 18: 1463–147210.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
43. Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys, 2007, 126: 01410110.1063/1.2408420 ↗
44. Baranyai A, Evans DJ. Direct entropy calculation from computer simulation of liquids. Phys Rev A, 1989, 40: 3817–382210.1103/PhysRevA.40.3817 ↗
45. Zuo P, Ran J, Ye C, et al. Advancing ion selective membranes with micropore ion channels in the interaction confinement regime. ACS Nano, 2024, 18: 6016–602710.1021/acsnano.3c12616 ↗
46. Liu H, Shi C, Chen Z, et al. Turning gas hydrate nucleation with oxygen-containing groups on size-selected graphene oxide flakes. J Energy Chem, 2023, 87: 351–35810.1016/j.jechem.2023.08.029 ↗
47. Karlsson RKB, Cornell A. Selectivity between oxygen and chlorine evolution in the chlor-alkali and chlorate processes. Chem Rev, 2016, 116: 2982–302810.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00389 ↗
48. Xiao X, Shehzad MA, Yasmin A, et al. Anion permselective membranes with chemically-bound carboxylic polymer layer for fast anion separation. J Membrane Sci, 2020, 614: 11855310.1016/j.memsci.2020.118553 ↗
49. Wang P, Wang M, Liu F, et al. Ultrafast ion sieving using nanoporous polymeric membranes. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 56910.1038/s41467-018-02941-6 ↗
50. Xu T, Wu B, Hou L, et al. Highly ion-permselective porous organic cage membranes with hierarchical channels. J Am Chem Soc, 2022, 144: 10220–1022910.1021/jacs.2c00318 ↗
51. Zhang H, Hou J, Hu Y, et al. Ultrafast selective transport of alkali metal ions in metal organic frameworks with subnanometer pores. Sci Adv, 2018, 4: eaaq006610.1126/sciadv.aaq0066 ↗
52. Chen Z, Hu C, Lu C, et al. Steric hindrance-induced dehydration promotes cation selectivity in trans-subnanochannel transport. ACS Nano, 2023, 17: 12629–1264010.1021/acsnano.3c03028 ↗
53. Sigurdardottir SB, DuChanois RM, Epsztein R, et al. Energy barriers to anion transport in polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofiltration membranes: role of intra-pore diffusion. J Membrane Sci, 2020, 603: 11792110.1016/j.memsci.2020.117921 ↗
54. Zhang H, Xing J, Wei G, et al. Electrostatic-induced ion-confined partitioning in graphene nanolaminate membrane for breaking anion–cation co-transport to enhance desalination. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 432410.1038/s41467-024-48681-8 ↗
55. Xu T, Wu B, Li W, et al. Perfect confinement of crown ethers in MOF membrane for complete dehydration and fast transport of monovalent ions. Sci Adv, 2024, 10: eadn094410.1126/sciadv.adn0944 ↗
56. Lu C, Hu C, Chen Z, et al. Dehydration-enhanced ion-pore interactions dominate anion transport and selectivity in nanochannels. Sci Adv, 2023, 9: eadf841210.1126/sciadv.adf8412 ↗
57. Xu R, Kang Y, Zhang W, et al. Oriented UiO-67 metal–organic framework membrane with fast and selective lithium-ion transport. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e20211544310.1002/anie.202115443 ↗
58. Zhao K, Lee WC, Rezaei M, et al. Tuning pore size in graphene in the angstrom regime for highly selective ion–ion separation. ACS Nano, 2024, 18: acsnano.3c1106810.1021/acsnano.3c11068 ↗
59. Zhang Y, Hao Z, Hussein I, et al. Tunable ionic sieving membrane via reactive layer-by-layer assembly of porous organic cages. Adv Funct Mater, 2024, 34: 231575010.1002/adfm.202315750 ↗
60. Epsztein R, DuChanois RM, Ritt CL, et al. Towards single-species selectivity of membranes with subnanometre pores. Nat Nanotechnol, 2020, 15: 426–43610.1038/s41565-020-0713-6 ↗
61. Xu F, Wei M, Zhang X, et al. Ion rejection in covalent organic frameworks: revealing the overlooked effect of in-pore transport. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 45246–4525510.1021/acsami.9b18234 ↗
62. Dzugutov M. A universal scaling law for atomic diffusion in condensed matter. Nature, 1996, 381: 137–13910.1038/381137a0 ↗