journal article·2019-08Open access

The bond evolution mechanism of covalent sulfurized carbon during electrochemical sodium storage process

Tianjing Wu, Chenyang Zhang, Guoqiang Zou, Jiugang Hu, Limin Zhu, Xiaoyu Cao, Hongshuai Hou, Xiaobo Ji

Science China Materials· Volume 62· Issue 8

Abstract

The excellent energy storage performance of covalent sulfur-carbon material has gradually attracted great interest. However, in the electrochemical sodium storage process, the bond evolution mechanism remains an elusive topic. Herein, we develop a one-step annealing strategy to achieve a high covalent sulfur-carbon bridged hybrid (HCSC) utilizing phenylphosphinic acid as the carbon-source/catalyst and sodium sulfate as the sulfur-precursor/salt template, in which the sulfur mainly exists in the forms of C–S–C and C–S–S–C. Notably, most of the bridge bonds are electrochemically cleaved when the cycling voltage is lower than 0.6 V versus Na/Na+, leading to the appearance of two visible redox peaks in the following cyclic voltammogram (CV) tests. The in-situ and ex-situ characterizations demonstrate that S2− is formed in the reduction process and the carbon skeleton is concomitantly and irreversibly isomerized. Thus, the cleaved sulfur and isomerized carbon could jointly contribute to the sodium storage in 0.01–3.0 V. In a Na-S battery system, the activated HCSC in cut off voltage window of 0.6–2.8 V achieves a high reversible capacity (770 mA h g−1 at 300 mA g−1). This insight reveals the charge storage mechanism of sulfur-carbon bridged hybrid and provides an improved enlightenment on the interfacial chemistry of electrode materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced battery technologies research · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Guo Q, Ma Y, Chen T, et al. Cobalt sulfide quantum dot embedded N/S-doped carbon nanosheets with superior reversibility and rate capability for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 12658–1266710.1021/acsnano.7b07132 ↗
2. Li Z, Chen Y, Jian Z, et al. Defective hard carbon anode for Na-ion batteries. Chem Mater, 2018, 30: 4536–454210.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00645 ↗
3. Xin S, Gu L, Zhao NH, et al. Smaller sulfur molecules promise better lithium–sulfur batteries. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 18510–1851310.1021/ja308170k ↗
4. Tan G, Xu R, Xing Z, et al. Burning lithium in CS2 for highperforming compact Li2S–graphene nanocapsules for Li–S batteries. Nat Energy, 2017, 2: 1709010.1038/nenergy.2017.90 ↗
5. Fan L, Ma R, Yang Y, et al. Covalent sulfur for advanced room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy, 2016, 28: 304–31010.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.056 ↗
6. Yang CP, Yin YX, Guo YG, et al. Electrochemical (de)lithiation of 1D sulfur chains in Li–S batteries: a model system study. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 2215–221810.1021/ja513009v ↗
7. Yang J, Zhou X, Wu D, et al. S-doped N-rich carbon nanosheets with expanded interlayer distance as anode materials for sodiumion batteries. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 160410810.1002/adma.201604108 ↗
8. Xu D, Chen C, Xie J, et al. A hierarchical N/S-codoped carbon anode fabricated facilely from cellulose/polyaniline microspheres for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2016, 6: 150192910.1002/aenm.201501929 ↗
9. Wang YX, Yang J, Lai W, et al. Achieving high-performance roomtemperature sodium–sulfur batteries with S@interconnected me-soporous carbon hollow nanospheres. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 16576–1657910.1021/jacs.6b08685 ↗
10. Qie L, Chen W, Xiong X, et al. Sulfur-doped carbon with enlarged interlayer distance as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv Sci, 2015, 2
11. Tuček J, Błoński P, Sofer Z, et al. Sulfur doping induces strong ferromagnetic ordering in graphene: effect of concentration and substitution mechanism. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 5045–5053
12. Xin S, Yin YX, Guo YG, et al. A high-energy room-temperature sodium-sulfur battery. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 1261–126510.1002/adma.201304126 ↗
13. Wang YX, Zhang B, Lai W, et al. Room-temperature sodiumsulfur batteries: a comprehensive review on research progress and cell chemistry. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7: 160282910.1002/aenm.201602829 ↗
14. Conder J, Bouchet R, Trabesinger S, et al. Direct observation of lithium polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries using operando Xray diffraction. Nat Energy, 2017, 2: 1706910.1038/nenergy.2017.69 ↗
15. Yu X, Manthiram A. Performance enhancement and mechanistic studies of room-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries with a carbon-coated functional nafion separator and a Na2S/activated carbon nanofiber cathode. Chem Mater, 2016, 28: 896–90510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04588 ↗
16. Wang X, Li G, Hassan FM, et al. Sulfur covalently bonded graphene with large capacity and high rate for high-performance sodium-ion batteries anodes. Nano Energy, 2015, 15: 746–75410.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.038 ↗
17. Poh HL, Šimek P, Sofer Z, et al. Sulfur-doped graphene via thermal exfoliation of graphite oxide in H2S, SO2, or CS2 gas. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 5262–527210.1021/nn401296b ↗
18. Graczyk PP, Mikolajczyk M. Inapplicability of the antiperiplanar lone pair hypothesis to C−P bond breaking and formation in some S−C−P+ systems. J Org Chem, 1996, 61: 2995–300210.1021/jo941771m ↗
19. Okuma K, Shigetomi T, Nibu Y, et al. Synthesis of isolable thiirane-2-thione (α-dithiolactone) from thioketene S-oxide. J Am Chem Soc, 2004, 126: 9508–950910.1021/ja0480320 ↗
20. Juaristi E, Notario R. Theoretical examination of the S–C–P anomeric effect. J Org Chem, 2015, 80: 2879–288310.1021/jo5029425 ↗
21. Legnani L, Toma L, Caramella P, et al. Computational mechanistic study of thionation of carbonyl compounds with Lawesson’s reagent. J Org Chem, 2016, 81: 7733–774010.1021/acs.joc.6b01420 ↗
22. Yu X, Xie J, Yang J, et al. Lithium storage in conductive sulfurcontaining polymers. J Electroanal Chem, 2004, 573: 121–128
23. Sainbileg B, Lan YB, Wang JK, et al. Deciphering anomalous Raman features of regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) in ordered aggregation form. J Phys Chem C, 2018, 122: 4224–423110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00326 ↗
24. Raccichini R, Varzi A, Passerini S, et al. The role of graphene for electrochemical energy storage. Nat Mater, 2014, 14: 271–27910.1038/nmat4170 ↗
25. Pachfule P, Shinde D, Majumder M, et al. Fabrication of carbon nanorods and graphene nanoribbons from a metal–organic framework. Nat Chem, 2016, 8: 718–72410.1038/nchem.2515 ↗
26. Kumar R, Pillai RG, Pekas N, et al. Spatially resolved raman spectroelectrochemistry of solid-state polythiophene/viologen memory devices. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 14869–1487610.1021/ja304458s ↗
27. Xu J, Wang M, Wickramaratne NP, et al. High-performance sodium ion batteries based on a 3D anode from nitrogen-doped graphene foams. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 2042–204810.1002/adma.201405370 ↗
28. Ghanty TK, Ghosh SK. Simple density functional approach to polarizability, hardness, and covalent radius of atomic systems. J Phys Chem, 1994, 98: 9197–920110.1021/j100088a018 ↗
29. Zhou G, Paek E, Hwang GS, et al. Long-life Li/polysulphide batteries with high sulphur loading enabled by lightweight three-dimensional nitrogen/sulphur-codoped graphene sponge. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 776010.1038/ncomms8760 ↗
30. Shi X, Chen Y, Lai Y, et al. Metal organic frameworks templated sulfur-doped mesoporous carbons as anode materials for advanced sodium ion batteries. Carbon, 2017, 123: 250–25810.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.056 ↗
31. Cao Y, Xiao L, Sushko ML, et al. Sodium ion insertion in hollow carbon nanowires for battery applications. Nano Lett, 2012, 12: 3783–378710.1021/nl3016957 ↗
32. Ding J, Wang H, Li Z, et al. Carbon nanosheet frameworks derived from peat moss as high performance sodium ion battery anodes. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 11004–1101510.1021/nn404640c ↗
33. Carter R, Oakes L, Douglas A, et al. A sugar-derived room-temperature sodium sulfur battery with long term cycling stability. Nano Lett, 2017, 17: 1863–186910.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05172 ↗
34. Yu X, Manthiram A. Na2S-carbon nanotube fabric electrodes for room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eur J, 2015, 21: 4233–423710.1002/chem.201405344 ↗
35. Wei S, Xu S, Agrawral A, et al. A stable room-temperature sodium–sulfur battery. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 1172210.1038/ncomms11722 ↗
36. Qiang Z, Chen YM, Xia Y, et al. Ultra-long cycle life, low-cost room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries enabled by highly doped (N,S) nanoporous carbons. Nano Energy, 2017, 32: 59–6610.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.018 ↗
37. Kim H, Hong J, Yoon G, et al. Sodium intercalation chemistry in graphite. Energy Environ Sci, 2015, 8: 2963–296910.1039/C5EE02051D ↗
38. Placke T, Schmuelling G, Kloepsch R, et al. In situ X-ray diffraction studies of cation and anion intercalation into graphitic carbons for electrochemical energy storage applications. Z anorg allg Chem, 2014, 640: 1996–200610.1002/zaac.201400181 ↗
39. Yu X, Manthiram A. Room-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries with liquid-phase sodium polysulfide catholytes and binder-free multiwall carbon nanotube fabric electrodes. J Phys Chem C, 2014, 118: 22952–2295910.1021/jp507655u ↗
40. Park J, Yu BC, Park JS, et al. Tungsten disulfide catalysts supported on a carbon cloth interlayer for high performance Li-S battery. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7: 160256710.1002/aenm.201602567 ↗