Study on two-stage detection of keyhole tungsten inert gas welding penetration states
Source abstract
Abstract
Keyhole tungsten inert gas welding has been widely applied in medium and thick plate connections due to its high efficiency. This study proposes a two-stage model, PSP-SquNet, for accurate classification of the weld penetration state. Knowledge distillation is applied to enhance the performance of the segmentation network, which is subsequently used to extract a coloured mask of the weld pool. After that, the mask is fed into SqueezeNet, which recognises four different stages of penetration: burn-through, complete penetration, partial penetration, and lack of penetration. This approach shows good stability and performance in real-time applications, achieving a detection accuracy of 98.49% while keeping the inference speed at 80 FPS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1362171824130187110.1177/13621718241301871 ↗
2. 10.1179/13621710032291062410.1179/136217100322910624 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1412342610.3390/ma14123426 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.02210.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.022 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1515543210.3390/ma15155432 ↗
6. 10.1179/136217108X32929610.1179/136217108X329296 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-021-07398-410.1007/s00170-021-07398-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.06.01910.1016/j.conengprac.2013.06.019 ↗
9. 10.1179/13621710010153820910.1179/136217100101538209 ↗
10. 10.1179/1362171814Y.000000022510.1179/1362171814Y.0000000225 ↗
11. 10.1179/1362171815Y.000000004910.1179/1362171815Y.0000000049 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.00910.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.009 ↗
13. Liu J Fan Z Olsen S et al. Using active contour models for feature extraction in camera-based seam tracking of arc welding. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 5948–5955. 2009.10.1109/IROS.2009.5354390 ↗
14. 10.3901/CJME.2015.0908.11010.3901/CJME.2015.0908.110 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.07.00410.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.07.004 ↗
16. 10.1155/2023/631799210.1155/2023/6317992 ↗
17. 10.1016/0890-6955(95)00083-610.1016/0890-6955(95)00083-6 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.01.01110.1016/j.jmapro.2017.01.011 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-014-6081-310.1007/s00170-014-6081-3 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40436-020-00335-w10.1007/s40436-020-00335-w ↗
21. 10.1007/s00170-009-2250-110.1007/s00170-009-2250-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.03310.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.033 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170-020-06466-510.1007/s00170-020-06466-5 ↗
24. 10.1007/s40436-023-00437-110.1007/s40436-023-00437-1 ↗
25. Yang D, Dai P, Cui S, et al. Real-time recognition of molten pools based on improved DeepLabV3 + in Keyhole tungsten inert gas welding applications. Electronics (Basel) 2024; 13: 283.
26. Zhao H Shi J Qi X et al. Pyramid scene parsing network. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Honolulu HI USA 2017 6230–6239. 2016.10.1109/CVPR.2017.660 ↗
27. Sandler M Howard A Zhu M et al. Mobilenetv2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Salt Lake City UT USA 2018 4510–4520. 2018.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
28. Heo B Kim J Yun S et al. A comprehensive overhaul of feature distillation. In: 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 1921–1930. 2019.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00201 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compag.2023.10860410.1016/j.compag.2023.108604 ↗
30. Hinton GE Vinyals O Michael Dean J. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531. 2015.
31. Xie E Wang W Yu Z et al. SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105.15203. 2021.
32. Poudel RPK Liwicki S Cipolla R. Fast-SCNN: Fast Semantic Segmentation Network. arXiv (Cornell University). 2019.
33. Wang H Jiang X Ren H et al. SwiftNet: Real-Time Video Object Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) June 1296–1305. 2021.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00135 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_4910.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 ↗
35. Iandola FN Han S Moskewicz MW et al. SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and 0.5MB model size. arXiv (Cornell University). 2016.
36. Ma N Zhang X Zheng H et al. ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.11164. 2018.10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 ↗
37. Tan M Le Q. EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv (Cornell University). 2019.
38. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.05810.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.058 ↗