Evaluation of flow properties in weldments of vanadium alloys using novel indentation technique
Source abstract
Abstract
A new approach, known as automated ball indentation testing, was successfully employed to determine the flow properties of gas tungsten arc and electron beam welds of V–4Cr–4Ti and V–5Cr–5Ti alloys. The results showed clear distinction among the properties of the fusion zone, heat affected zone, and base metal in both welds of the two alloys. The two welds of both vanadium alloys in the as welded condition showed strengthening (as well as hardening) of fusion zone and heat affected zone (compared with base metal), with the fusion zone having higher strength than the heat affected zone. However, the gas tungsten arc welds of both alloys, after a post-weld heat treatment of 950°C for 2 h, showed a recovery of properties. These measurements correlated reasonably well with the reported recovery of the Charpy impact properties of the welds after the post-weld heat treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1520/STP12719S10.1520/STP12719S ↗
2. Haggag F. M., and Bell G. E. C.: in ‘International trends in welding sciences and technology’, (ed. S. A. David and J. M. Vitek), 637–642; 1993, Materials Park, OH, ASM International.
3. Byun THAK-SANG, Haggag F. M., Farrell K., and Lee E. H.: unpublished research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, 1996.
4. Farrell K., Mahmood S. T., Kurishita H., Murty K. L., and Haggag F. M.: unpublished research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, 1996.
5. Au P., Lucas G. E., Sheckherd J. W., and Odette G. R. ‘Proceedings of the third international conference on non-destructive evaluation in nuclear industry’, 597–610; 1980, Metals Park, OH, ASM.
6. 10.1016/0022-3115(91)90205-L10.1016/0022-3115(91)90205-L ↗
7. 10.1016/0022-3115(91)90202-I10.1016/0022-3115(91)90202-I ↗
8. 10.1016/0022-3115(92)90612-O10.1016/0022-3115(92)90612-O ↗
9. Loomis B. A., Nowicki L. J., Gazda J., and Smith D. L. ‘Fusion reactor materials semiannual progress report’, DOE/ER-0313/14, 318–325; March 1993, Oak Ridge, TN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
10. King J. F., Goodwin G. M., and Alexander D. J. ‘Fusion reactor materials semiannual progress report’, DOE/ER-0313/17, 152–155; September 1994, Oak Ridge, TN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
11. Gubbi A. N., and Rowcliffe A. F.: unpublished research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, 1996.
12. Loomis B. A., Nowicict L. J., and Smith D. L. ‘Fusion reactor materials semiannual progress report’, DOE/ER-0313/18, 265–272; March 1995, Oak Ridge, TN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
13. King J. F., Goodwin G. M., Alexander D. J., and Grossbeck M. L.: unpublished research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, 1996.