journal article·2014-10

Real time monitoring of laser beam welding keyhole depth by laser interferometry

J. J. Blecher, C. M. Galbraith, C. Van Vlack, T. A. Palmer, J. M. Fraser, P. J. L. Webster, T. DebRoy

Publisher page

Abstract

The utility of a new laser interferometric technique, inline coherent imaging, for real time keyhole depth measurement during laser welding is demonstrated on five important engineering alloys. The keyhole depth was measured at 200 kHz with a spatial resolution of 22 μm using a probe beam, which enters the keyhole coaxially with the process beam. Keyhole fluctuations limited average weld depth determination to a resolution on the order of 100 μm. Real time keyhole depth data are compared with the weld depths measured from the corresponding metallographic cross-sections. With the exception of an aluminium alloy, the technique accurately measured the average weld depth with differences of less than 5%. The keyhole depth growth rates at the start of welding are measured and compare well with order of magnitude calculations. The method described here is recommended for the real time measurement and control of keyhole depth in at least five different alloys.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy, Queen's University at Kingston, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada

Laser Depth Dynamics Inc., Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2L1, Canada

Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/1362171813Y.000000018010.1179/1362171813Y.0000000180 ↗
2. 10.1179/1362171813Y.000000013710.1179/1362171813Y.0000000137 ↗
3. 10.1179/1362171810Y.000000002210.1179/1362171810Y.0000000022 ↗
4. 10.1179/136217110X1273141473971810.1179/136217110X12731414739718 ↗
5. 10.1179/136217108X37253110.1179/136217108X372531 ↗
6. 10.2351/1.52185810.2351/1.521858 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.253758710.1063/1.2537587 ↗
8. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/18/03710.1088/0022-3727/40/18/037 ↗
9. 10.1364/AO.40.00601910.1364/AO.40.006019 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.005 ↗
11. 10.1243/09544054JEM132010.1243/09544054JEM1320 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10845-009-0267-910.1007/s10845-009-0267-9 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.36926310.1063/1.369263 ↗
14. Farson D · Weld. J. · 1998 · 77 · 142s
15. 10.1088/0957-0233/7/4/01910.1088/0957-0233/7/4/019 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.02.02510.1016/j.optlastec.2012.02.025 ↗
17. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/8/08550110.1088/0022-3727/42/8/085501 ↗
18. Webster PJL · Proc. SPIE · 2010 · 7590 · 003
19. 10.2351/1.356795510.2351/1.3567955 ↗
20. Webster PJL, Wright LG, Ji Y, Galbraith CM, Kinross AW, Van Vlack C, and Fraser JM: ‘Fully-automatic laser welding and micro-sculpting with universal in situ inline coherent imaging, arXiv:1404·4419, 2014.10.1364/OL.39.006217 ↗
21. 10.1088/0022-3727/33/5/30410.1088/0022-3727/33/5/304 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.136817810.1063/1.1368178 ↗