Comparative study on laser welding characteristics of aluminium alloy under atmospheric and subatmospheric pressures
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser bead on plate welding of 10 mm thick aluminium alloy under atmospheric and subatmospheric pressures were comparatively investigated. With the decrease of ambient pressure, the penetration depth increased sharply at first and then gradually levelled off. The largest penetration depth could reach 8·7 mm when welded under the pressures of 101 Pa, while only 4·9 mm under atmospheric pressure. Weld bead without any porosity was produced under ambient pressures of 10−1 Pa. The average tensile strength of joints welded under the pressure of 101 Pa was 300·2 MPa. The tensile strength remained constant as the ambient pressure decreased further. The shielding effect of plasma plume on laser beam was suppressed as the ambient pressure decreased. Therefore, the laser power deposition inside the keyhole was enhanced effectively. Under subatmospheric pressure, the porosity defects were eliminated effectively due to the keyhole stability and the change of liquid flow, i.e. moving upward along the rear wall of keyhole.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1533/9781845698843.1610.1533/9781845698843.16 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0143-8166(00)00045-210.1016/S0143-8166(00)00045-2 ↗
3. 10.1179/09506609910152829810.1179/095066099101528298 ↗
4. 10.1080/0950711920954821610.1080/09507119209548216 ↗
5. 10.1533/wint.2003.313810.1533/wint.2003.3138 ↗
6. 10.1088/0022-3727/37/13/01010.1088/0022-3727/37/13/010 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.09.00210.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.09.002 ↗
8. 10.1002/lapl.20111001010.1002/lapl.201110010 ↗
9. 10.1088/0022-3727/28/12/00710.1088/0022-3727/28/12/007 ↗
10. 10.1117/12.49780110.1117/12.497801 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.04.02710.1016/j.optlastec.2013.04.027 ↗
12. Sun Z · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1999 · 12 · 113110.1007/BF00420544 ↗
13. Farrbo R · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 39410.1088/0022-3727/39/2/023 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0143-8166(00)00045-210.1016/S0143-8166(00)00045-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0030-3992(99)00080-810.1016/S0030-3992(99)00080-8 ↗
16. 10.1007/s12206-010-0309-410.1007/s12206-010-0309-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00637-310.1016/S0921-5093(03)00637-3 ↗
18. Xie J · Weld. J. · 2002 · 81 · 223s
19. Yang S · Weld. J. · 2013 · 92 · 197s
20. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.01010.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.010 ↗
21. Youhei A · Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. · 2014
22. Katayama S · Trans. JWRI · 2011 · 40 · 15
23. 10.2351/1.140441310.2351/1.1404413 ↗
24. Reisgen U, Olschok S, and Longerich S: Proc. Conf. ICALEO 2010, Anaheim, CA, USA, November 2010, LIA, 1–10.
25. Borner C · Proc. SPIE · 2003 · 8603 · 1
26. 10.1063/1.36004610.1063/1.360046 ↗
27. Brandes EA, and Brook GB: ‘Smithells metals reference book’, 8-54, 14-1; 1992, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann.
28. 10.1117/12.18472010.1117/12.184720 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.157373210.1063/1.1573732 ↗
30. Williams D: ‘Spectroscopy’; 1976, New York, Academic Press.
31. Miller R · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 68 · 204510.1063/1.346555 ↗
32. 10.1080/1478644100863614810.1080/14786441008636148 ↗
33. Aden M, Kreutz EW, and Hausen O: Proc. Conf. ICALEO 1998, Orlando, FL, USA, November 1998, LIA, Section C, 139–147.
34. Pastor M · Weld. J. · 1999 · 78 · 207s
35. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.04.00310.1016/j.optlastec.2013.04.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.10410.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.104 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.10.00510.1016/j.jmapro.2013.10.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/0956-716X(95)00373-410.1016/0956-716X(95)00373-4 ↗
39. 10.1117/12.37700610.1117/12.377006 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.37303310.1063/1.373033 ↗