journal article·2026-05

Columnar-to-equiaxed grain transition in laser-MIG hybrid welding of aluminum alloy via an external steady magnetic field

Fuyun Liu, Jun Tian, Xiaohui Zhou, Zhuoming Tan, Xuanyu Wang, Jianhui Su, Hongbo Xia, Caiwang Tan, Xinkang Li, Xiaohui Han, Xiaoguo Song

Publisher page

Abstract

Oscillating/alternating magnetic fields have been proven to promote columnar-to-equiaxed grain transition (CET) in laser/arc welded joints, whereas the effectiveness of steady magnetic fields remains controversial. This study explored whether CET can be promoted by an external steady magnetic field in laser–MIG hybrid welding of aluminum alloy. Welds were produced at different magnetic flux densities; grain morphology and thermal–fluid flow were analyzed. The results showed that the steady transverse magnetic field interacted with the arc current to generate a backward Lorentz force in the rear molten pool, fracturing columnar dendrite tips and promoting CET. However, Joule heating induced by the magnetic field caused grain coarsening. This study will provide a more underlying understanding of weld grain growth dynamics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Harbin Institute of Technology

Dalian University of Technology

CRRC Academy (Qingdao) Co., Ltd

CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2351/1.184853210.2351/1.1848532 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.10895010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.108950 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11689610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116896 ↗
4. 10.1080/13621718.2020.173054610.1080/13621718.2020.1730546 ↗
5. 10.1080/13621718.2022.210602210.1080/13621718.2022.2106022 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.01410.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.014 ↗
7. 10.1179/1362171812Y.000000007010.1179/1362171812Y.0000000070 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.11.01310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.11.013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10871810.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108718 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11756910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117569 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13978710.1016/j.msea.2020.139787 ↗
13. 10.1080/09507116.2011.59269110.1080/09507116.2011.592691 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.03.03910.1016/j.jmapro.2025.03.039 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.00710.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.007 ↗
16. 10.1080/13621718.2022.206356510.1080/13621718.2022.2063565 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.02110.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.021 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.02810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.028 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.10.03010.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.10.030 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.12039010.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120390 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.06.05710.1016/j.jmapro.2023.06.057 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.03010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.04110.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.041 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10878710.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108787 ↗
25. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.13204110.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
26. Kou S, Le Y. Nucleation mechanism and grain refining of weld metal. Weld J 1986; 65: 65–70.
27. 10.1007/BF0265431710.1007/BF02654317 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.02710.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.027 ↗