journal article·2019-07Open access

Functionally graded structures of refractory metals by wire arc additive manufacturing

Gianrocco Marinelli, Filomeno Martina, Heather Lewtas, David Hancock, Supriyo Ganguly, Stewart Williams

Abstract

Functionally graded components are usually preferred for severe and critical service conditions, thanks to the possibility of achieving different complementary material properties within the same structure. Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing is an emerging technology which lends itself well to the production of sound graded structures. In this study, an integral structure of two functional gradients, namely tantalum to molybdenum, and molybdenum to tungsten, was successfully deposited. A linear gradient was observed in both composition and hardness. Microstructure, elemental composition and hardness were characterised as a function of position, and discussed. The study demonstrates that WAAM has the potential to successfully deposit functionally graded structures of refractory metals, obtaining controlled properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Welding Engineering and Laser Processing Centre (WELPC), Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK

United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK

Funding

European Commission · Research Councils UK

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<663::AID-NME787>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<663::AID-NME787>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/0272-8842(95)00143-310.1016/0272-8842(95)00143-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00016-910.1016/S1359-8368(96)00016-9 ↗
4. 10.6089/jscm.13.25710.6089/jscm.13.257 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0022-3115(97)00264-X10.1016/S0022-3115(97)00264-X ↗
6. 10.1063/1.289917810.1063/1.2899178 ↗
7. Bohidar SK · Int J Sci Footprints · 2014 · 8
8. 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.00610.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.006 ↗
9. 10.1002/adem.20130057910.1002/adem.201300579 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.07510.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.075 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20150008610.1002/adem.201500086 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.00110.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.001 ↗
13. 10.2109/jcersj.99.100210.2109/jcersj.99.1002 ↗
14. 10.1108/1355254051057338310.1108/13552540510573383 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11663-015-0509-510.1007/s11663-015-0509-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.07010.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.070 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01910.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00405-310.1016/S1359-6454(96)00405-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.02.01210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.02.012 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-013-5157-910.1007/s00170-013-5157-9 ↗
21. 10.1134/S207511331402017810.1134/S2075113314020178 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.08.31310.1016/j.phpro.2015.08.313 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.00910.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.009 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.12.08410.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.12.084 ↗
25. Brandes EA · 1992
26. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.05.03810.1016/j.optlastec.2017.05.038 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.05410.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.03210.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.032 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.11.09210.1016/j.msea.2011.11.092 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.03610.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.036 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.01610.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.016 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0266384910.1007/BF02663849 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.06.02310.1016/j.commatsci.2011.06.023 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.11510.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.115 ↗