journal article·2015-10

Analysis of process parameters effects on dissimilar friction stir welding of AA1100 and A441 AISI steel

H. A. Derazkola, H. J. Aval, M. Elyasi

Publisher page

Abstract

A prominent benefit of friction stir welding process is to join plates with dissimilar material. In this study, an attempt is made to find effects of tool offset, plunge depth, welding traverse speed and tool rotational speed on tensile strength, microhardness and material flow in dissimilar friction stir welding of AA1100 aluminium alloy and A441 AISI steel plates. Here, one factor at a time experimental design was utilised for conducting the experiments. Results indicated the strongest joint obtained at 1·3 mm tool offset and 0·2 mm plunge depth when the tool rotational speed and linear speed were 800 rev min− 1 and 63 mm min− 1 respectively. The maximum tensile strength of welded joints with mentioned optimal parameters was 90% aluminium base metal. Fracture locations in tensile test at all samples were in aluminium sides. Owing to the formation of intermetallic compounds at high tool rotational speed, the microhardness of joint interface goes beyond that of A441 AISI steel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Sari Branch, Sari, Iran

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Babol University of Technology, Shariati Avenue, Babol, Iran

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.54410.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.544 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.01310.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.013 ↗
4. 10.1243/095440504232361210.1243/0954405042323612 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.022 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.028 ↗
7. 10.1179/175355509X1260891682599410.1179/175355509X12608916825994 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.04.00210.1016/j.matdes.2004.04.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.11710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.117 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10853-009-3336-810.1007/s10853-009-3336-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62683-710.1016/S1003-6326(13)62683-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.00310.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.003 ↗
13. Anon, 2013.
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.00110.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.01610.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.016 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.05.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.05.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.05410.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.054 ↗
19. 10.1179/136217110X1271421730965010.1179/136217110X12714217309650 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.05410.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.054 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.02110.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.021 ↗