Physics-informed machine learning models for the prediction of transient temperature distribution of ferritic steel in directed energy deposition by cold metal transfer
Source abstract
Abstract
In-situ monitoring of the additive layer characteristics in the directed energy deposition (DED) process by any contact technology is cumbersome. A well-tested finite element (FE) model is often employed to extract transient temperature distribution during deposition. However, the numerical model pertaining to each deposition attribute is computationally expensive. In the present work, we have generated a dataset through an experimentally validated thermal model, and further multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms are applied to train datasets. Models with an accuracy of more than 99% are utilised for the prediction of transient temperature distribution. The validation of deposition attributes using experiments and numerical model suggests that the physics-informed machine learning models for cold metal transfer can be applied in the DED process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India
Materials Engineering Division, CSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, India
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board , Government of India
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.02010.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.00310.1016/j.addma.2018.04.003 ↗
4. Zhao Y · Addit Manuf · 2020 · 32 · 1
5. Qin J · Addit Manuf · 2022 · 52 · 1
6. Ding D · J Ind Inf Integr · 2021 · 23 · 1
7. Wu Q · Addit Manuf · 2020 · 35 · 1
8. 10.1016/j.compind.2022.10373910.1016/j.compind.2022.103739 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.01210.1016/j.eng.2019.04.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10219710.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102197 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.03310.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.033 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.11273410.1016/j.cma.2019.112734 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.02.00310.1016/j.mfglet.2022.02.003 ↗
14. 6.13 analysis user's manual (2013), (2022) 2022.
15. Li R · Addit Manuf · 2021 · 46 · 1
16. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.03610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.036 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.09.00710.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.09.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10423510.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104235 ↗
19. 10.1289/EHP471310.1289/EHP4713 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13361210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133612 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.02310.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.023 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.10002410.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100024 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.12.07110.1016/j.ijleo.2018.12.071 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11320710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113207 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.10784510.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107845 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.11066010.1016/j.measurement.2021.110660 ↗