Analytical model for estimation of interface weld strength in ultrasonic additive manufacturing (UAM) of similar and dissimilar tempered aluminum alloy 6061 (AA6061)
Source abstract
Abstract
Process modeling of ultrasonic additive manufacturing (UAM) is critical for optimizing process settings with minimal experimental trials. In this research, a parameter termed weld quality ( Q w ) is formulated based on hardness and process settings to predict the shear strength of aluminum alloy 6061 (AA6061) UAM weld interfaces between similar and dissimilar tempers. Four AA6061 tempers are investigated: O (annealed), H18 (cold rolled with 75% thickness reduction), T4 (solution heat treated and naturally aged), and T6 (solution heat treated and artificially aged). Shear samples quantify the shear strength at foil-to-foil and baseplate-to-foil interfaces, with near-gapless bonding observed. The Q w parameter linearly correlates with shear strength measurements, achieving a coefficient of determination ( {R}2 ) of 91.18%.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Funding
Division of Industrial Innovation and Partnerships
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-005610.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0056 ↗
2. 10.1108/1355254071077617910.1108/13552540710776179 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.013 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.004 ↗
5. Siggard EJ. Investigative research into the structural embedding of electrical and mechanical systems using ultrasonic consolidation (UC). Master’s Thesis Utah State University Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 2007.
6. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2021.08.00110.1016/j.mfglet.2021.08.001 ↗
7. 10.3390/cryst1212169610.3390/cryst12121696 ↗
8. 10.1088/2053-1591/abe9d310.1088/2053-1591/abe9d3 ↗
9. 10.1557/jmr.2014.13910.1557/jmr.2014.139 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.03710.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.037 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2024.11849110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2024.118491 ↗
12. 10.1179/026708310X1281599241825610.1179/026708310X12815992418256 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61760-010.1016/S0007-8506(07)61760-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.08.00910.1016/j.jmapro.2017.08.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.05010.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.050 ↗
16. 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90040-010.1016/0001-6160(89)90040-0 ↗
17. 10.1179/03063458279042702810.1179/030634582790427028 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.05610.1016/j.msea.2017.03.056 ↗
19. Taskin M, Dikbas H, Caligulu U. Artificial neural network (ANN) approach to prediction of diffusion bonding behavior (shear strength) of Ni–Ti alloys manufactured by powder metallurgy method. Math Comput Appl 2008; 13: 183–191.
20. 10.1080/13621718.2019.160748610.1080/13621718.2019.1607486 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.00610.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.006 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.19110.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.191 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.04.00410.1016/j.cirpj.2023.04.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.01910.1016/j.msea.2015.05.019 ↗
25. 10.1080/13621718.2016.124964410.1080/13621718.2016.1249644 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.001 ↗
27. 10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-016810.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0168 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.02210.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.022 ↗
29. 10.1088/1468-6996/9/2/02300110.1088/1468-6996/9/2/023001 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00170-020-06439-810.1007/s00170-020-06439-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.05.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2015.05.008 ↗
32. Schick D, Hahnlen R, Dehoff R, et al. Microstructural characterization of bonding interfaces in aluminum 3003 blocks fabricated by ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Weld J 2010; 89: 105S.
33. 10.1179/1362171815Y.000000007210.1179/1362171815Y.0000000072 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.001 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13845710.1016/j.msea.2019.138457 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10694310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106943 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.04910.1016/j.msea.2015.02.049 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11665-008-9225-510.1007/s11665-008-9225-5 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.06110.1016/j.msea.2011.08.061 ↗