Modelling of fume particle behaviour and coupling glass contamination during vacuum laser beam welding
Source abstract
Abstract
Vacuum laser beam welding utilises the advantages of both laser and electron beam welding. In this study, a numerical model was developed to simulate fume particle behaviour and the contamination of coupling glass through which the laser beam irradiates the vacuum chamber. Supplying a proper flow rate of shielding gas suppresses the infiltration of fume particles into the protective system and prevents the rising of fumes inside the system. The high momentum of the supplied gas could discharge fume particles out of the protective system and horizontally deflect fume particles away. The developed numerical model showed a good agreement with the experimental results, and a systematic method for designing and optimising the protective system was established.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Functional Technology R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Incheon, Korea
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Katayama S, Mizutani M, Kawahito Y, Fundamental research of 100 kW fiber laser welding technology. Proceedings of the Lasers in Manufacturing Conference (LiM); 2015 Jun 22–25; Munich, Germany.
2. 10.2351/1.349945610.2351/1.3499456 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60031-510.1016/S1005-0302(11)60031-5 ↗
4. 10.1179/1362171812Y.000000007310.1179/1362171812Y.0000000073 ↗
5. 10.2351/7.000010710.2351/7.0000107 ↗
6. 10.1364/OL.42.00225110.1364/OL.42.002251 ↗
7. 10.2351/1.140441310.2351/1.1404413 ↗
8. 10.2351/1.506209410.2351/1.5062094 ↗
9. 10.2351/1.506209310.2351/1.5062093 ↗
10. 10.2351/1.506230210.2351/1.5062302 ↗
11. Elmer J · Weld J · 2016 · 95 · 419
12. 10.3390/app923508210.3390/app9235082 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.01010.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.010 ↗
14. 10.2351/1.506289710.2351/1.5062897 ↗
15. 10.2351/1.506163910.2351/1.5061639 ↗
16. 10.1179/1362171813Y.000000018210.1179/1362171813Y.0000000182 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.08.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.08.011 ↗
18. 10.1364/AO.54.00109010.1364/AO.54.001090 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.01.01210.1016/j.vacuum.2017.01.012 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.02610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.026 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11638510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116385 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40194-016-0302-310.1007/s40194-016-0302-3 ↗
23. 10.2351/1.498316510.2351/1.4983165 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00170-018-2592-710.1007/s00170-018-2592-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.12.16510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.12.165 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.01.06710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.01.067 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.10.00410.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.10.004 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.36840510.1063/1.368405 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.155777810.1063/1.1557778 ↗