Nickel based superalloy welding practices for industrial gas turbine applications
Source abstract
Abstract
The continued drive for increased efficiency, performance and reduced costs for industrial gas turbine engines demands extended use of high strength-high temperature capability materials, such as nickel based superalloys. To satisfy the requirements of the component design and manufacturing engineers, these materials must be capable of being welded in a satisfactory manner. The present paper describes the characteristic defects found as a result of welding the more difficult, highly alloyed materials and reviews a number of welding processes used in the manufacture and repair of nickel alloy components. These include gas tungsten arc (GTA) and electron beam (EB) welding, laser powder deposition and friction welding. Many of the more dilute nickel based alloys are readily weldable using conventional GTA processes; however, high strength, precipitation hardened materials are prone to heat affected zone and strain age cracking defect formation. A number of factors are found to affect the propensity for defects: composition (aluminium and titanium content), grain size, pre- and post-weld heat treatment, as well as the welding process itself (control of heat input and traverse speed). Process parameter identification is still largely empirical and a fuller understanding of the joining processes is dependent upon the development and application of more sophisticated numerical modelling techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. ‘Standard welding terms and conditions’, ANSI/AWS A3.0-89, American Welding Society, 1989.
2. 10.7449/2000/Superalloys_2000_665_67410.7449/2000/Superalloys_2000_665_674 ↗
3. Hunziker O., Dye D., Roberts S. M., and Reed R. C.: Proc. Conf. on ‘Numerical analysis of weldability’, Graz-Seggau, Austria, 1999.
4. 10.1007/s11661-001-0149-z10.1007/s11661-001-0149-z ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00273-110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00273-1 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00427-810.1016/S1359-6462(98)00427-8 ↗
7. Huang X. · A · 1996 · 785
8. 10.1007/s11661-997-0220-510.1007/s11661-997-0220-5 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:100651443191510.1023/A:1006514431915 ↗
10. 10.1179/imr.1998.43.1.110.1179/imr.1998.43.1.1 ↗
11. Pease R. E. · Weld. J. Res · 1957 · 330
12. Cannon-Muskegon Technical Bulletin, ‘CM939 WeldableTM alloy.’ August 2002.
13. 10.1016/0308-0161(87)90012-310.1016/0308-0161(87)90012-3 ↗
14. Prager M. · Weld Res. Council Bull · 1968 · 128
15. Kelly T.: Proc. Symp. on ‘Weldability of materials’, (eds R. A. Patterson and K. W. Mahn), 151–157; 1990, ASM Int., Detroit, MI, USA.
16. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00367-010.1016/S1359-6454(00)00367-0 ↗
17. Gaumann M. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process · 1999 · 1
18. Russell M. J., and Threadgill P. L. ‘Repair of IN939 rotor assembly—initial feasibility studies.’ TWI Report NO: 12603/1/00, 2000.