Effects of weaving laser on scanning laser-MAG hybrid welding characteristics of high-strength steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Scanning laser-MAG hybrid welding with weaving laser was developed for the bead-on-plate welding of high-strength steel. Weaving laser exerted little effect on the droplet transfer behaviour during the scanning laser-MAG hybrid welding process. In order to achieve the keyhole mode of laser welding, the weaving amplitude should be no more than 2 mm. The weld penetration decreased with the increasing weaving frequency. Compared to laser-MAG hybrid weld, the ratio of arc zone width to laser zone width decreased significantly. Scanning laser-MAG hybrid welding could suppress the porosity defects of weld efficiently. The optimal weaving frequency for the porosity defects suppression was 20 Hz. However, the porosity defects increased sharply with the weaving frequency of laser over 40 Hz. The impact-absorbed energy value of specimen fabricated by scanning laser-MAG hybrid welding was about 46 J, increased by about 31.4% compared to about 35 J of laser-MAG hybrid welding.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Kelly S. M. · Weld. J. · 2009 · 88 · 32
2. 10.1179/174328108X35850510.1179/174328108X358505 ↗
3. Defalco J. · Weld. J. · 2007 · 86 · 47
4. 10.2351/1.505616310.2351/1.5056163 ↗
5. Thomy C. · Weld. J. · 2006 · 7 · 54
6. 10.1007/BF0326351410.1007/BF03263514 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.00210.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.002 ↗
8. 10.1179/13621710422502165210.1179/136217104225021652 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.01610.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.016 ↗
10. 10.1533/wint.2007.368010.1533/wint.2007.3680 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.05.07710.1016/j.msea.2013.05.077 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.09.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.09.024 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0267033810.1007/BF02670338 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11665-012-0207-210.1007/s11665-012-0207-2 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12666-012-0118-910.1007/s12666-012-0118-9 ↗
16. 10.2351/1.349945610.2351/1.3499456 ↗
17. 10.1179/1362171812Y.000000007310.1179/1362171812Y.0000000073 ↗
18. 10.1179/13621710422502162510.1179/136217104225021625 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60031-510.1016/S1005-0302(11)60031-5 ↗
20. Yamazaki Y. · 2013 · 1
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.021 ↗
22. 10.1177/095440541142511410.1177/0954405411425114 ↗
23. 10.1117/12.28114310.1117/12.281143 ↗
24. Schedewy R. · Proc. of the 27th international congress on application of lasers and electro-optics (ICALEO), Temecula, USA · 2008 · 332
25. Zhang X. D. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 20 · 633
26. 10.1117/12.37700610.1117/12.377006 ↗
27. Pastor M. · Weld. J. · 1999 · 78 · 207s