Effect of shielding gas and activating flux on weld bead geometry in tungsten inert gas welding of austenitic stainless steels
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of three shielding gases (argon and argon–hydrogen and argon–helium mixtures) and two activating fluxes (a commercial flux and a TiO2 based flux) on the geometry of welds produced by the tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding process on several casts of austenitic stainless steel AISI 316, using currents ranging from 100 to 300 A. Penetration depth increases with increasing current for all shielding gases, but weld depth to width ratio is higher for argon than for argon–hydrogen shielded welds. Both activating fluxes produce a substantial increase in penetration depth and in depth to width ratio of the welds. No correlation was found between penetration depth and oxygen content in the melted material. Some interaction exists between activating fluxes and shielding gases, which can affect the weld geometry and/or the defect formation in the welds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. ‘ASM handbook’, Vol. 6, ‘Welding, brazing and soldering’, 4th edn, 190; 1997, Materials Park, OH, ASM International.
2. Lancaster J. F., and Mills K. C., Doc IIW. 212–796–91, International Institute of Welding, Paris.
3. Savage W. F. · Weld. J · 1979 · 58 · 212
4. Karagiannis S., and Chryssolouris G., Proc SPIE, (ed. A. Carabelas et al.), 5131: 260–264; 2003, Bellingham, WA, SPIE-International Society of Optical Engineering.10.1117/12.513646 ↗
5. Bertoluzzo G. O.: ICRA-1996-64, International Institute of Welding, Paris, 1996.
6. 10.1179/13621710032291062410.1179/136217100322910624 ↗
7. 10.1179/13621710010153846110.1179/136217100101538461 ↗
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.408710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.4087 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00435-510.1016/S0924-0136(99)00435-5 ↗
10. Pierce S. W. · Weld. J · 1999 · 78 · 45s
11. Limmaneevichitr C. · Weld. J · 2000 · 79 · 231s
12. 10.2320/matertrans.43.292610.2320/matertrans.43.2926 ↗
13. 10.1179/stw.2000.5.1.810.1179/stw.2000.5.1.8 ↗
14. 10.1179/13621710110153868610.1179/136217101101538686 ↗
15. Lancaster J. F. (ed.): ‘The physics of welding’, 2nd edn, 49; 1986, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
16. 10.1179/09506609079032396610.1179/095066090790323966 ↗
17. Changshen J., Xianqing Y., and Kemin X., Doc IIW. 212-863-94, International Institute of Welding, Paris.
18. Mendez P. F. · Weld. J · 2003 · 82 · 296
19. Yamamuchi N., and Taka T., Doc IIW. 212-452-79, International Institute of Welding, Paris.
20. Norrish J. ‘Advanced welding processes’, 124; 1992, London, Institute of Physics Publishing.
21. Pitscheneder W. · Weld. J · 1996 · 75 · 71
22. 10.2355/isijinternational.43.159010.2355/isijinternational.43.1590 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.05710.1016/j.msea.2004.05.057 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.00410.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.004 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11661-004-0234-110.1007/s11661-004-0234-1 ↗
26. 10.2355/isijinternational.45.6610.2355/isijinternational.45.66 ↗