Estimate of maximum pore size in keyhole laser welding of carbon steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Porosity is easily formed in welded joints during high power laser welding due to keyhole instability. Large pores have detrimental effects on the fatigue resistance of a component and cause many failures in welded parts. This paper is aimed at predicting the maximum pore dimension in long laser welded joints, starting from the sampling of large pores in shorter joints. Two sampling strategies and, consequently, two estimating techniques, both belonging to the statistics of extremes, were explored. The first approach, extreme value type, is used to estimate the size of the maximum pore in each of a series of steel samples. In each sample, the larger single pore or two large pores which are very close are the measured maximum pore. The second approach, threshold value type, is used to estimate the size of pores larger than a critical threshold in a single sample of steel. Both approaches lead to good estimates of the largest pore distribution in short laser welded joints. However, the first one is more adequate to describe the largest pore distribution, because it allows the synergetic effect of two adjacent pores to be considered. In particular, the Gumbel distribution adequately fits the experimental data even in the case of welded joints 10 times longer than the investigated bead length.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2351/1.52185810.2351/1.521858 ↗
2. 10.1080/0950711020954955510.1080/09507110209549555 ↗
3. 10.1533/wint.2003.313810.1533/wint.2003.3138 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00637-310.1016/S0921-5093(03)00637-3 ↗
5. 10.1088/0022-3727/38/5/00910.1088/0022-3727/38/5/009 ↗
6. Matsunawa A., and Katayama S.: Proc. Conf. on ‘Joining of advanced and specialty materials III’, Indianapolis, IN, USA, November 2001, ASM, 8–15.
7. 10.1179/13621710422502162510.1179/136217104225021625 ↗
8. 10.1179/13621710322500549910.1179/136217103225005499 ↗
9. Previtali B., and Capello E.: Proc. 8th Biennial ASME Conf. on ‘Engineering systems design and analysis’, Turin, Italy, July 2006, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, CD-ROM.
10. Zhao H. · Weld. J · 2001 · 8 · 204
11. 10.2351/1.149376610.2351/1.1493766 ↗
12. 10.2351/1.474537010.2351/1.4745370 ↗
13. Katayama S., Mizutani M., and Matsunawa A.: Proc. SPIE 1st Int. Symp. on ‘High-power laser macroprocessing’, Osaka, Japan, March 2003, SPIE, Vol. 4831, 281–288.10.1117/12.497801 ↗
14. 10.2351/1.132471710.2351/1.1324717 ↗
15. 10.1080/0950711020954955810.1080/09507110209549558 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.06810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.068 ↗
17. Tzeng Y. F. · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol · 2006 · 3
18. Hobbacher A. ‘Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components’, IIW document XIII-1965-03/XV-1127-03, IIW, Paris, France, 2003.
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.15010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.150 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10853-006-0833-x10.1007/s10853-006-0833-x ↗
21. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00053-710.1016/S0142-1123(03)00053-7 ↗
22. Partanen T. · Weld. World · 1997 · 39 · 74
23. Murakami Y. ‘Metal fatigue: effect of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions’, 1st edn, 321; 2002, Amsterdam, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-008044064-4/50001-3 ↗
24. ‘Arc-welded joints in steel – guidance on quality levels for imperfections’, EN 25817, July 1992.
25. ‘Welding – electron and laser beam welded joints – guidance on quality levels for imperfections – part 1: steel’, EN ISO 13919–1, 1996.
26. ‘Welding – electron and laser beam welded joints – guidance on quality levels for imperfections – part 2: aluminium and its weldable alloys’, EN ISO 13919–2, 2001.
27. ‘Classification of imperfections in metallic fusion welds with explanations’, EN 26520, 1992.
28. Hilton P., Blackburn J., and Chong P.: Proc. 26th Int. Cong ICALEO, Orlando, FL, USA, November 2008, Laser Institute of America, 887–895.
29. ‘Specification for fusion welding for aerospace applications’, D17·1, AWS, 2001.
30. Beirlant J., Goegebeur Y., Segers J., and Teugels J. ‘Statistics of extremes: theory and applications’, 1st edn, 19–42; 2004, New York, Wiley.10.1002/0470012382 ↗
31. 10.1023/A:100997641855310.1023/A:1009976418553 ↗
32. Anderson C. W., Beretta S., de Mare J., and Svensson T. ‘Technical recommendations for extremis value analysis of data on large nonmetallic inclusions in steels’, P11-02, European Structural Integrity Society, Geesthacht, Germany, 2002.
33. ‘Standard practice for extreme value analysis of nonmetallic inclusions in steel and other microstructural features’, E2283, ASTM, Philadelohia, PA, USA, 2003.
34. Gumbel E. J. ‘Statistics of extremes’, 1st edn, 20; 1958, New York, Columbia University Press.10.7312/gumb92958 ↗
35. Coles S. ‘An introduction to statistical modelling of extreme values’, 2nd edn, 18; 2003, London, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0_2 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.03510.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.035 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00034-810.1016/S1359-6454(99)00034-8 ↗
38. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00041-710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00041-7 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00281-010.1016/S1359-6454(00)00281-0 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0079-6425(02)00014-210.1016/S0079-6425(02)00014-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.09.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.09.013 ↗
42. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00104.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00104.x ↗
43. 10.1007/s11663-001-0036-410.1007/s11663-001-0036-4 ↗
44. 10.1179/02670830222500773610.1179/026708302225007736 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.01610.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.016 ↗
46. Samuel K., and Saralees N. ‘Extreme value distributions: theory and applications’, 1st edn, 61–68; 2000, London, Imperial College Press.10.1142/9781860944024_0002 ↗