Longitudinal conductivity of LaF3/SrF2multilayer heterostructures
Source abstract
Abstract
LaF3/SrF2 multilayer heterostructures with thicknesses of individual layers in the range 5–100 nm have been grown on MgO(100) substrates using molecular beam epitaxy. The longitudinal conductivity of the films has been measured using impedance spectroscopy in the frequency range 10−1–106 Hz and a temperature range 300–570 K. The ionic DC conductivities have been determined from Nyquist impedance diagrams and activation energies from the Arrhenius–Frenkel equation. An increase of the DC conductivity has been observed to accompany decreased layer thickness for various thicknesses as small as 25 nm. The greatest conductivity has been shown for a multilayer heterostructure having thicknesses of 25 nm per layer. The structure has a conductivity two orders of magnitude greater than pure LaF3 bulk material. The increasing conductivity can be understood as a redistribution of charge carriers through the interface due to differing chemical potentials of the materials, by strong lattice-constant mismatch, and/or by formation of a solid La1-xSrxF3-x solution at the interface during the growth process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics, Nanotechnology and Telecommunications, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Divisions of Solid State Physics and Physics of Dielectric and Semiconductors, Ioffe Institute, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Institute for Microproduction Technology, Leibniz University of Hanover, Garbsen, Germany
Funding
Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1134/S106377450705014810.1134/S1063774507050148 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0243041510.1007/BF02430415 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0925-4005(97)00193-710.1016/S0925-4005(97)00193-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0925-4005(96)01913-210.1016/S0925-4005(96)01913-2 ↗
5. 10.1039/c1jm13535j10.1039/c1jm13535j ↗
6. 10.1016/S0925-4005(02)00238-110.1016/S0925-4005(02)00238-1 ↗
7. 10.1038/3505004710.1038/35050047 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.05430410.1103/PhysRevB.89.054304 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00488-510.1016/S0167-2738(02)00488-5 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.12542910.1103/PhysRevB.76.125429 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.v19:110.1002/adfm.v19:1 ↗
12. 10.1002/chem.20110241010.1002/chem.201102410 ↗
13. Vergentev TY · St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University J Phys Math · 2013 · 4 · 76
14. 10.1134/S106378341301032010.1134/S1063783413010320 ↗
15. 10.1134/S102319351308020X10.1134/S102319351308020X ↗
16. 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I ↗
17. 10.1107/S010876818500167710.1107/S0108768185001677 ↗
18. Sorokin NI · Crystallogr Rep · 1996 · 41 · 292
19. Wang L · Int J Electrochem Sci · 2012 · 7 · 34510.1016/S1452-3981(23)13343-8 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.180955610.1149/1.1809556 ↗
21. 10.2109/jcersj2.122.17910.2109/jcersj2.122.179 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.04010.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.040 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.46516510.1063/1.465165 ↗
24. 10.1016/0079-6786(95)00004-E10.1016/0079-6786(95)00004-E ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ssi.2005.02.02110.1016/j.ssi.2005.02.021 ↗
26. 10.1143/JJAP.44.861310.1143/JJAP.44.8613 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.05.04310.1016/j.ssi.2006.05.043 ↗
28. 10.1134/S106378340803003710.1134/S1063783408030037 ↗
29. 10.1134/S106377451406027310.1134/S1063774514060273 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-3-319-23126-610.1007/978-3-319-23126-6 ↗
31. 10.1149/1.210070310.1149/1.2100703 ↗
32. 10.1016/0167-2738(87)90082-810.1016/0167-2738(87)90082-8 ↗
33. 10.1088/1468-6996/11/5/05450310.1088/1468-6996/11/5/054503 ↗