A data-driven elucidation of the challenges in designing stable quinone derivatives for aqueous organic redox flow batteries: correlations between thermodynamics of chemical degradation and energy capacity metrics
Source abstract
Abstract
Aqueous organic redox flow batteries (AORFBs) offer significant potential for grid-scale storage of renewable energy. However, their commercial viability is often limited by the chemical instability of the organic electrolytes. Quantifying and assessing the effects of the various degradation mechanisms from a molecular design perspective is very challenging both experimentally and computationally. Here, we propose the use of simple thermodynamic descriptors for seven degradation mechanisms for a diverse virtual library of ca. 2000 monofunctionalized quinones built from seven core structures. In the process, we developed a cheminformatics-based workflow that can reliably and automatically generate reactants and mechanism-specific degradation products. Using DFT-calculated reaction Gibbs free energies as thermodynamic descriptors and a calibrated model for redox-potential prediction, we systematically analyse seven degradation mechanisms across this library. We find clear relationships between redox potential and degradation thermodynamics for six of the seven mechanisms, with opposite trend directions for oxidized and reduced forms, revealing stability – potential trade-offs that constrain molecular design. The analysis further shows how functional groups modulate degradation thermodynamics, helps rationalize the relative stability of anthraquinone-based outliers. Finally, redox active molecules from recent experimental studies are evaluated within the proposed thermodynamics-based framework, and we comment on the implications of electrochemical reversibility of some critical degradation mechanisms. Overall, this work provides a physically motivated framework for the multi-objective screening of quinone-based AORFB electrolytes and helps clarify the design criteria needed to identify favourable molecular outliers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Ionic liquids properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
RWTH Aachen University
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, Schloss Birlinghoven 1
Funding
China Scholarship Council · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Land Nordrhein-Westfalen
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen H, Cong G, Lu Y-C. Recent progress in organic redox flow batteries: Active materials, electrolytes and membranes. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2018;27(5):1304–1325.10.1016/j.jechem.2018.02.009 ↗
2. Zhao Z, Zhang C, Li X. Opportunities and challenges of organic flow battery for electrochemical energy storage technology. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2022;67:621–639.10.1016/j.jechem.2021.10.037 ↗
3. Mao J, Ruan W, Chen Q. Understanding the Aqueous Solubility of Anthraquinone Sulfonate Salts: The Quest for High Capacity Electrolytes of Redox Flow Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2020;167(7).
4. Winsberg J, Hagemann T, Janoschka T, et al. Redox-Flow Batteries: From Metals to Organic Redox-Active Materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56(3):686–711.10.1002/anie.201604925 ↗
5. Bauer S, Namyslo JC, Kaufmann DE, et al. Evaluation of Options and Limits of Aqueous All-Quinone-Based Organic Redox Flow Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2020;167(11).10.1149/1945-7111/aba338 ↗
6. Forner-Cuenca A. Bringing redox organics back to life. Nat Chem. 2022;14(10):1091–1092.10.1038/s41557-022-01045-5 ↗
7. Sharmoukh W. Redox flow batteries as energy storage systems: materials, viability, and industrial applications. RSC Adv. 2025;15(13):10106–10143.10.1039/D5RA00296F ↗
8. Ji Y, Goulet MA, Pollack DA, et al. A Phosphonate‐Functionalized Quinone Redox Flow Battery at Near‐Neutral pH with Record Capacity Retention Rate. Advanced Energy Materials. 2019;9(12).
9. Soloveichik GL. Flow Batteries: Current Status and Trends. Chem Rev. 2015;115(20):11533–58.10.1021/cr500720t ↗
10. Fontmorin J-M, Guiheneuf S, Godet-Bar T, et al. How anthraquinones can enable aqueous organic redox flow batteries to meet the needs of industrialization. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 2022;61.
11. Han Y-K, Jin C-S. Computational screening of electroactive indolequinone derivatives as high-performance active materials for aqueous redox flow batteries. Current Applied Physics. 2018;18(12):1507–1512.10.1016/j.cap.2018.09.007 ↗
12. Ye R, Henkensmeier D, Chen R. Imidazolium cation enabled reversibility of a hydroquinone derivative for designing aqueous redox electrolytes. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2020;4(6):2998–3005.10.1039/D0SE00409J ↗
13. Goulet M-A, Aziz MJ. Flow Battery Molecular Reactant Stability Determined by Symmetric Cell Cycling Methods. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2018;165(7):A1466–A1477.10.1149/2.0891807jes ↗
14. Mazur P, Charvat J, Mrlik J, et al. Evaluation of Electrochemical Stability of Sulfonated Anthraquinone-Based Acidic Electrolyte for Redox Flow Battery Application. Molecules. 2021;26(9).10.3390/molecules26092484 ↗
15. Fornari RP, Mesta M, Hjelm J, et al. Molecular Engineering Strategies for Symmetric Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries. ACS Materials Letters. 2020;2(3):239–246.10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00028 ↗
16. Kristensen SB, van Mourik T, Pedersen TB, et al. Simulation of electrochemical properties of naturally occurring quinones. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13571.10.1038/s41598-020-70522-z ↗
17. Li J, Xu H, Wang J, et al. Theoretical insights on the hydration of quinones as catholytes in aqueous redox flow batteries. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2021;37:72–78.10.1016/j.cjche.2021.06.016 ↗
18. Cannon CG, Klusener PAA, Brandon NP, et al. Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries: Small Organic Molecules for the Positive Electrolyte Species. ChemSusChem. 2023;16(18):e202300303.10.1002/cssc.202300303 ↗
19. Lu H, Yu J, Zhang J, et al. Designing p‐π Conjugated Naphthoquinone‐Derivatives as High‐Performance Cathodes for Aqueous Proton Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. 2025;35(24).
20. Ozouf I, Fontmorin JM, Lebeuf R, et al. Long-cycling of a water-soluble quinizarin derivative in redox flow batteries: Role of the cut-off voltage on the stability. Electrochimica Acta. 2024;475.
21. Gerhardt MR, Tong L, Gómez‐Bombarelli R, et al. Anthraquinone Derivatives in Aqueous Flow Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016;7(8).10.1002/aenm.201601488 ↗
22. Huang Z, Lee J, Henkensmeier D, et al. Effect of Molecular Structure and Coordinating Ions on the Solubility and Electrochemical Behavior of Quinone Derivatives for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2020;167(16).10.1149/1945-7111/abc90c ↗
23. Kwabi DG, Wong AA, Aziz MJ. Rational Evaluation and Cycle Life Improvement of Quinone-Based Aqueous Flow Batteries Guided by In-Line Optical Spectrophotometry. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2018;165(9):A1770–A1776.10.1149/2.0791809jes ↗
24. Li Z, Lu YC. Material Design of Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries: Fundamental Challenges and Mitigation Strategies. Adv Mater. 2020;32(47):e2002132.10.1002/adma.202002132 ↗
25. Wedege K, Drazevic E, Konya D, et al. Organic Redox Species in Aqueous Flow Batteries: Redox Potentials, Chemical Stability and Solubility. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39101.10.1038/srep39101 ↗
26. Kwabi DG, Lin K, Ji Y, et al. Alkaline Quinone Flow Battery with Long Lifetime at pH 12. Joule. 2018;2(9):1894–1906.10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.005 ↗
27. Sivanadanam J, Murugan R, Khan H, et al. Investigation of Alkyl Amine Substituted Quinone Derivatives for the Redox Flow Battery Applications in Acidic Medium. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2022;169(2).10.1149/1945-7111/ac505f ↗
28. Tabor DP, Gómez-Bombarelli R, Tong L, et al. Mapping the frontiers of quinone stability in aqueous media: implications for organic aqueous redox flow batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2019;7(20):12833–12841.10.1039/C9TA03219C ↗
29. Liu Y, Chen Q, Zhang X, et al. Degradation of electrochemical active compounds in aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2022;32.
30. Wu M, Jing Y, Wong AA, et al. Extremely Stable Anthraquinone Negolytes Synthesized from Common Precursors. Chem. 2020;6(6):1432–1442.10.1016/j.chempr.2020.03.021 ↗
31. Beck F, Heydecke G. On the Mechanism of the Cathodic Reduction of Anthraquinone to Anthrone. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie. 1987;91(1).10.1002/bbpc.19870910109 ↗
32. Jing Y, Fell EM, Wu M, et al. Anthraquinone Flow Battery Reactants with Nonhydrolyzable Water-Solubilizing Chains Introduced via a Generic Cross-Coupling Method. ACS Energy Letters. 2021;7(1):226–235.10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02504 ↗
33. Tong L, Goulet M-A, Tabor DP, et al. Molecular Engineering of an Alkaline Naphthoquinone Flow Battery. ACS Energy Letters. 2019;4(8):1880–1887.10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01321 ↗
34. Fain VY, Zaitsev BE, Ryabov MA. Tautomerism of anthraquinones: III. Tautomerization and rotational isomerization as processes responsible for the appearance of several π1,π*-bands in the absorption spectra of hydroxy-substituted quinones. Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2006;42(10):1464–1468.10.1134/S1070428006100101 ↗
35. Carney TJ, Collins SJ, Moore JS, et al. Concentration-Dependent Dimerization of Anthraquinone Disulfonic Acid and Its Impact on Charge Storage. Chemistry of Materials. 2017;29(11):4801–4810.10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00616 ↗
36. Jing Y, Zhao EW, Goulet MA, et al. In situ electrochemical recomposition of decomposed redox-active species in aqueous organic flow batteries. Nat Chem. 2022;14(10):1103–1109.10.1038/s41557-022-00967-4 ↗
37. Goulet MA, Tong L, Pollack DA, et al. Extending the Lifetime of Organic Flow Batteries via Redox State Management. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(20):8014–8019.10.1021/jacs.8b13295 ↗
38. Zhang X, de Silva P. Computational framework for discovery of degradation mechanisms of organic flow battery electrolytes. Chem Sci. 2025;16(19):8422–8434.10.1039/D4SC07640K ↗
39. Liu Y, Zhang P, Wu Z, et al. Biomimetic Naphthoquinone Zwitterion Derivative with Water-Solubilizing Amino Acid Side Chain for High-Stability Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ACS Energy Letters. 2024;9(2):586–593.10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02530 ↗
40. Wu M, Bahari M, Jing Y, et al. Highly Stable, Low Redox Potential Quinone for Aqueous Flow Batteries**. Batteries & Supercaps. 2022;5(6).
41. Kerr EF, Tang Z, George TY, et al. High Energy Density Aqueous Flow Battery Utilizing Extremely Stable, Branching-Induced High-Solubility Anthraquinone near Neutral pH. ACS Energy Letters. 2022;8(1):600–607.10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01691 ↗
42. Jethwa RB, Zhao EW, Kerber RN, et al. Designing for conjugate addition: an amine functionalised quinone anolyte for redox flow batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2021;9(27):15188–15198.10.1039/D1TA02870G ↗
43. Fenini F, Drazevic E, Bentien A. Impact of pH management on utilization and performance of anthraquinone/ ferrocyanide flow batteries. Journal of Power Sources. 2022;540.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231641 ↗
44. Guiheneuf S, Godet-Bar T, Fontmorin JM, et al. A new hydroxyanthraquinone derivative with a low and reversible capacity fading process as negolyte in alkaline aqueous redox flow batteries. Journal of Power Sources. 2022;539.
45. Gerken JB, Anson CW, Preger Y, et al. Comparison of Quinone‐Based Catholytes for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries and Demonstration of Long‐Term Stability with Tetrasubstituted Quinones. Advanced Energy Materials. 2020;10(20).10.1002/aenm.202000340 ↗
46. Yang X, Garcia SN, Janoschka T, et al. Novel, Stable Catholyte for Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries: Symmetric Cell Study of Hydroquinones with High Accessible Capacity. Molecules. 2021;26(13).10.3390/molecules26133823 ↗
47. Nandi S, de Sousa LE, Vegge T, et al. Degradation of Quinone‐based Flow Battery Electrolytes: Effect of Functional Groups on the Reaction Mechanism**. Batteries & Supercaps. 2022;6(2).10.1002/batt.202200443 ↗
48. Liu W, Zhao Z, Li T, et al. A high potential biphenol derivative cathode: toward a highly stable air-insensitive aqueous organic flow battery. Sci Bull (Beijing). 2021;66(5):457–463.10.1016/j.scib.2020.08.042 ↗
49. Khetan A. High-Throughput Virtual Screening of Quinones for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries: Status and Perspectives. Batteries. 2022;9(1).10.3390/batteries9010024 ↗
50. Bento AP, Hersey A, Félix E, et al. An open source chemical structure curation pipeline using RDKit. Journal of Cheminformatics. 2020;12(1).10.1186/s13321-020-00456-1 ↗
51. Bannan CC, Mobley DL. ChemPer: An Open Source Tool for Automatically Generating SMIRKS Patterns. Theoretical and Computational Chemistry. 2019.
52. Song Y, Buettner GR. Thermodynamic and kinetic considerations for the reaction of semiquinone radicals to form superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;49(6):919–62.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.05.009 ↗
53. Manisankar P, Valarselvan S. Electrocatalytic properties of glassy carbon electrodes modified with hydroxy derivatives of 9,10-anthraquinone for oxygen reduction reaction. Ionics. 2012;18(7):679–686.10.1007/s11581-012-0663-6 ↗
54. Schwan S, Schroder D, Wegner HA, et al. Substituent Pattern Effects on the Redox Potentials of Quinone-Based Active Materials for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ChemSusChem. 2020;13(20):5480–5488.10.1002/cssc.202000454 ↗
55. Coley CW, Green WH, Jensen KF. RDChiral: An RDKit Wrapper for Handling Stereochemistry in Retrosynthetic Template Extraction and Application. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2019;59(6):2529–2537.10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00286 ↗
56. Lovrić M, Molero JM, Kern R. PySpark and RDKit: Moving towards Big Data in Cheminformatics. Molecular Informatics. 2019;38(6).10.1002/minf.201800082 ↗
57. Srinath KR. Python – The Fastest Growing Programming Language. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 2017;04(12):354–357.
58. Guin PS, Das S, Mandal PC. Electrochemical Reduction of Quinones in Different Media: A Review. International Journal of Electrochemistry. 2011;2011:1–22.10.4061/2011/816202 ↗
59. Hoober-Burkhardt L, Krishnamoorthy S, Yang B, et al. A New Michael-Reaction-Resistant Benzoquinone for Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2017;164(4):A600–A607.10.1149/2.0351704jes ↗
60. Murali A, Nirmalchandar A, Krishnamoorthy S, et al. Understanding and Mitigating Capacity Fade in Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2018;165(7):A1193–A1203.10.1149/2.0161807jes ↗
61. Huang S, Zhang H, Salla M, et al. Molecular engineering of dihydroxyanthraquinone-based electrolytes for high-capacity aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4746.10.1038/s41467-022-32424-8 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41586-020-2081-710.1038/s41586-020-2081-7 ↗
63. Neese F. The ORCA program system. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 2011;2(1):73–78.10.1002/wcms.81 ↗
64. Medvedev MG, Bushmarinov IS, Sun J, et al. Density functional theory is straying from the path toward the exact functional. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2017;355:49–52.10.1126/science.aah5975 ↗
65. Barone V, Cossi M. quantum-calculation-of-molecular-energies-and-energy-gradients-in-solution-by-a-conductor-solvent-model. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 1998;102(11).10.1021/jp9716997 ↗
66. 10.1002/jcc.1018910.1002/jcc.10189 ↗
67. Truong TN, Stefanovich EV. A new method for incorporating solvent effect into the classical, ab initio molecular orbital and density functional theory frameworks for arbitrary shape cavity.pdf. Chemical Physics Letters. 1995;240(4):253–260.10.1016/0009-2614(95)00541-B ↗
68. Sorkun MC, Koelman J, Er S. Pushing the limits of solubility prediction via quality-oriented data selection. iScience. 2021;24(1):101961.10.1016/j.isci.2020.101961 ↗
69. Zhang Q, Khetan A, Sorkun E, et al. Data-driven discovery of small electroactive molecules for energy storage in aqueous redox flow batteries. Energy Storage Materials. 2022;47:167–177.10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.013 ↗
70. Zhang Q, Khetan A, Er S. A quantitative evaluation of computational methods to accelerate the study of alloxazine-derived electroactive compounds for energy storage. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4089.10.1038/s41598-021-83605-2 ↗
71. Zhang Q, Khetan A, Er S. Comparison of computational chemistry methods for the discovery of quinone-based electroactive compounds for energy storage. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):22149.10.1038/s41598-020-79153-w ↗
72. Wass JRTJ, Ahlberg E, Panas I, et al. Quantum Chemical Modeling of the Reduction of Quinones. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2006;110(5).
73. Lin J, Wang Y, Chen M, et al. Regulating the Gibbs Free Energy to Design Aqueous Battery‐Compatible Robust Host. Advanced Energy Materials. 2024;14(31).
74. Zhou X, Khetan A, Zheng J, et al. Discovery of lead quinone cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Digit Discov. 2023;2(4):1016–1025.10.1039/D2DD00112H ↗
75. Hu J, Liu Z, Yu DJ, et al. LS-align: an atom-level, flexible ligand structural alignment algorithm for high-throughput virtual screening. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(13):2209–2218.10.1093/bioinformatics/bty081 ↗
76. Fowles DJ, Connaughton BJ, Carter JW, et al. Physics-Based Solubility Prediction for Organic Molecules. Chem Rev. 2025;125(15):7057–7098.10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00855 ↗
77. Reber D, Wang Z, Amini K, et al. Solubility Challenges in Battery Electrolytes. Chem Rev. 2025;125(23):11216–11259.10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00332 ↗
78. Yang G, Zhu Y, Hao Z, et al. An Aqueous All‐Quinone‐Based Redox Flow Battery Employing Neutral Electrolyte. Advanced Energy Materials. 2024;14(26).10.1002/aenm.202400022 ↗
79. Ding Y, Li Y, Yu G. Exploring Bio-inspired Quinone-Based Organic Redox Flow Batteries: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study. Chem. 2016;1(5):790–801.10.1016/j.chempr.2016.09.004 ↗
80. Alfaraidi AM, Xi D, Ni N, et al. An Extremely Stable and Soluble NH2-Substituted Anthraquinone Electrolyte for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ACS Applied Energy Materials. 2023;6(24):12259–12266.10.1021/acsaem.3c01943 ↗