Non-linear current–voltage characteristics related to native defects in SrTiO3 and ZnO bicrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
AbstractAbstractSrTiO3 and ZnO bicrystals with various types of boundaries were fabricated in order to examine their current—voltage characteristics across single grain boundaries. Their grain boundary structures were also investigated by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. In Nb-doped SrTiO3, electron transport behaviors depend on the type of boundaries. Random type boundaries exhibit highly non-linear current—voltage characteristics, while low angle boundaries show a slight non-linearity. On the contrary, undoped ZnO does not exhibit non-linear current—voltage characteristics in any type of boundaries including random ones. It is suggested that the differences observed in current—voltage properties between the two systems are mainly due to the difference in the accumulation behavior of acceptor-like native defects at grain boundaries. A clear non-linearity is obtained by means of Co-doping even for the highly coherent ∑ 1 boundary in a ZnO bicrystal. This is considered to result from the production of acceptor-like native defects by Co-doping.Key Words: SrTiO3ZnOBicrystalI–V characteristicDouble Schottky barrierGrain boundary dislocationHigh-resolution transmission electron microscopy
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Advanced Materials Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
Institute of Engineering InnovationThe University of Tokyo, 2-11-16 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/JJAP.10.73610.1143/JJAP.10.736 ↗
2. 10.1143/JJAP.16.136110.1143/JJAP.16.1361 ↗
3. D.R. Clarke · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 1999 · 82 · 48510.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01793.x ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05232.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05232.x ↗
5. F. Greuter · Semiconductor Science and Technology · 1990 · 5 · 11110.1088/0268-1242/5/2/001 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.32633410.1063/1.326334 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.9126410.1063/1.91264 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1710210.1103/PhysRevB.49.17102 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06450.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06450.x ↗
10. 10.1016/0167-2738(89)90259-210.1016/0167-2738(89)90259-2 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.157-158.24910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.157-158.249 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.138099410.1063/1.1380994 ↗
13. 10.2320/matertrans.43.153710.2320/matertrans.43.1537 ↗
14. 10.1016/0001-6160(64)90175-010.1016/0001-6160(64)90175-0 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.699910.1103/PhysRevB.54.6999 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.09410810.1103/PhysRevB.66.094108 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-3697(74)80026-010.1016/S0022-3697(74)80026-0 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.395210.1103/PhysRevB.33.3952 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.241610.1103/PhysRevB.60.2416 ↗
20. R. Moos · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 1997 · 80 · 254910.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03157.x ↗
21. 10.1063/1.37114010.1063/1.371140 ↗
22. Y. Sato · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 2002 · 85 · 214210.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00424.x ↗
23. 10.1143/JJAP.38.502810.1143/JJAP.38.5028 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0927-0256(01)00162-810.1016/S0927-0256(01)00162-8 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.04540110.1103/PhysRevB.63.045401 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.33260710.1063/1.332607 ↗
27. 10.1016/0022-4596(75)90211-X10.1016/0022-4596(75)90211-X ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10461.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10461.x ↗
29. 10.2320/matertrans.43.143910.2320/matertrans.43.1439 ↗
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.157-158.24910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.157-158.249 ↗
31. 10.1016/0167-2738(89)90259-210.1016/0167-2738(89)90259-2 ↗
32. F. Oba · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 2003 · 86 · 161610.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03526.x ↗