journal article·2019-01-28Open access

Material characteristics of random glass-mat-reinforced thermoplastic under cryogenic thermal cycles

Kwang-Jun Park, Jeong-Hyeon Kim, Seul-Kee Kim, Haeng-Sung Heo, Jin-Ho Bae, Jae-Myung Lee

Abstract

Abstract In this study, cryogenic (77 K) to ambient (293 K) thermal shocks are induced to investigate the material behavior and failure characteristic of a random glass-mat-reinforced thermoplastic (GMT). The GMT has numerous advantages such as robust thermal conductivity, good mechanical strength, and good impact resistance. Hence, the GMT serves as an insulation material in liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier-cargo containment systems (CCSs). In this study, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 cryogenic thermal cyclic shocks (77 K to 293 K) were applied to the fabricated GMT samples. The time for each cycle was 40 min, and it took up to approximately four months to completely apply the thermal cyclic shock to the specimens. The elongation, tensile strength, and elastic modulus of the testing samples obtained from the stress–strain relationship and morphologies were investigated in terms of the number of thermal cyclic shocks and strain rate. Finally, explicit formulae were proposed considering the parameters such as material properties and number of cryogenic thermal cycles to predict the material capabilities under arbitrary loading rates and cryogenic thermal cycles. It was confirmed that the degradation and defects increased with an increase in the number of cryogenic thermal cycles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Gas Technology R&D Group, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering , Seoul , Korea

Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University , Busan , Korea

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim JH, Park WS, Chun MS, et al. Effect of pre-straining on low-temperature mechanical behavior of AISI 304L. Mater Sci Eng A 2012; 543: 50-57.10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.04410.1016/j.msea.2012.02.044 ↗
2. Dasappa P, Sullivan PL and Xiao X. Temperature effects on creep behavior of continuous fiber GMT composites. Compos Part A 2009; 40: 1071-1081.10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.026 ↗
3. Kim JW and Lee DG. Creep and tensile properties of press molding joint GMT-sheets. T Nonferr Metal Soc 2011; 21: 170-174.10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61083-210.1016/S1003-6326(11)61083-2 ↗
4. Park SB, Lee CS, Choi SW, et al. Polymeric foams for cryogenic temperature application: temperature range for non-recovery and brittle-fracture of microstructure. Compos Struct 2016; 136: 258-269.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.002 ↗
5. Kim JM, Kim SK, Kim, JM, et al. Numerical model to predict deformation of corrugated austenitic stainless steel sheet under cryogenic temperatures for design of liquefied natural gas insulation system. Mater Des 2014; 57: 26-39.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.03710.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.037 ↗
6. Kim JH, Park DH, Lee CS, et al. Effects of cryogenic thermal cycle and immersion on the mechanical characteristics of phenolresin bonded plywood. Cryogenics 2015; 72: 90-102.10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.09.00710.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.09.007 ↗
7. Jung KH, Kim DH, Kim HJ, et al. Finite element analysis of a low-velocity impact test for glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites considering mixed-mode interlaminar fracture toughness. Compos Struct 2017; 160: 446-456.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.093 ↗
8. Kim DH, Kim HG and Kim HS. Design optimization and manufacture of hybrid glass/carbon fiber reinforced composite bumper beam for automobile vehicle. Compos Struct 2015; 131: 742-752.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.028 ↗
9. Li Y, Lin Z, Jiang A, et al. Experimental study of glass-fiber mat thermoplastic material impact properties and lightweight automobile body analysis. Mater Des 2004; 25: 579-585.10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.01810.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.018 ↗
10. Belingardi G, Beyene AT and Jichuan D. Energy absorbing capability of GMT, GMTex and GMT-UD composite panels for static and dynamic loading - Experimental and numerical study. Compos Struct 2016; 143: 371-387.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.09910.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.099 ↗
11. Song Y, Gandhi U, Koziel A, et al. Effect of the initial fiber alignment on the mechanical properties for GMT composite materials. J Thermoplast Compos (DOI: 10.1177/0892705716681400).
12. Wolfrath J, Michaud V and Manson JAE. Deconsolidation in glass mat thermoplastics: Influence of the initial fibre/matrix configuration. Compos Sci Technol 2005; 65: 1601-1608.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.001 ↗
13. Renz R and Szymikowski R. Locally resolved hysteresis measurement of advanced glass-mat thermoplastic composites. Int J Fatigue 2010; 32: 174-183.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.02210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.022 ↗
14. Melcher RJ and Johnson WS. Mode I fracture toughness of an adhesively bonded composite-composite joint in a cryogenic environment. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 501-506.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.026 ↗
15. ASTM. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. D638 – 10 (2010) 1-16.
16. Lee NJ and Jang JS. The use of a mixed coupling agent system to improve the performance of polypropylene-based composites reinforced with short-glass-fibremat. Compos Sci Technol 1997; 57: 1559-1569.10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00086-9 ↗
17. Bartus SD and Vaidya UK. Performance of long fiber reinforced thermoplastics subjected to transverse intermediate velocity blunt object impact. Compos Struct 2005; 67: 263-277.10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.023 ↗
18. Dowling ND. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2007.