Analysis of Shear Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 318, 2019, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 624 pp.
2. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung - Abteilung Straßenbau, 2011, “Richtlinie zur Nachrechnung von Straßenbrücken im Bestand (Nachrechnungsrichtlinie),” edition 05/2011, 108 pp. (in German)
3. CAN/CSA A23.3-04, 2004, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 240 pp.
4. Chehab, A. I., and Eamon, C. D., 2019, “Reliability-Based Shear Rating of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders Considering Capacity Adjustment Factor,” ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, V. 5, No. 2, June, p. 04019006. doi: 10.1061/AJRUA6.000100910.1061/AJRUA6.0001009 ↗
5. Dunkelberg, D.; Sneed, L. H.; Zilch, K.; and Reineck, K.-H., 2018, “The 2015 ACI-DAfStb Database of Shear Tests on Slender Prestressed Concrete Beams without Stirrups—Overview and Evaluation of Current Design Approaches,” Structural Concrete, V. 19, No. 6, Dec., pp. 1740-1759. doi: 10.1002/suco.20170021610.1002/suco.201700216 ↗
6. Eamon, C. D.; Parra-Montesinos, G.; and Chehab, A., 2014, “Evaluation of Prestressed Concrete Beams in Shear,” Final report, prepared for Michigan Department of Transportation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 230 pp.
7. fib, 2012, “Model Code 2010: Final Draft,” Fédération Internationale du Béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 676 pp.
8. Hegger, J., and Herbrand, M., 2016, “Erweiterte Nachweiskonzepte nach Stufe 4 der Nachrechnungsrichtlinie,” Conference: 2. Brückenkolloquium Technische Akademie Esslingen, Ostfildern, Germany, 8 pp. (in German)
9. Hegger, J.; Maurer, R.; Zilch, K.; Herbrand, M.; Kolodziejczyk, A.; and Dunkelberg, D., 2014, “Beurteilung der Querkrafttragfähigkeit des Längssystems von Spannbetonbrücken im Bestand,” Bauingenieur, V. 12, pp. 500-510. (in German)
10. König, G., and Fischer, J., 1995, “Model Uncertainties concerning Design Equations for the Shear Capacity of Concrete Members without Shear Reinforcement,” CEB Bulletin No. 224: Model Uncertainties and Concrete Barriers for Environmental Protection, July, pp. 49-100.
11. Lantsoght, E. O. L.; de Boer, A.; and van der Veen, C., 2017, “Levels of Approximation for the Shear Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges,” Structural Concrete, V. 18, No. 1, pp. 143-152. doi: 10.1002/suco.20160001210.1002/suco.201600012 ↗
12. Lantsoght, E. O. L.; Zarate, G.; Zhang, F.; Park, M.-K.; Yang, Y.; and Sliedrecht, H., 2021, “Shear Experiments of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 3, May, pp. 117-130. doi: 10.14359/5172936010.14359/51729360 ↗
13. Marzahn, G., 2011, “Zur Richtlinie für die Nachrechnung von Straßenbrücken im Bestand (Nachrechnungsrichtlinie),” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, V. 106, No. 11, Nov., pp. 730-735. (in German) doi: 10.1002/best.20110006810.1002/best.201100068 ↗
14. Migalski, J., 2020, “Analytical, Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Helperzoom Post-Tensioned T-Girders,” MSc, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 205 pp.
15. NEN-EN 1992-1-1:2005, 2005, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium, 229 pp.
16. Rahal, K. N., and Collins, M. P., 1999, “Background to the General Method of Shear Design in the 1994 CSA-A23.3 Standard,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 26, No. 6, Dec., pp. 827-839. doi: 10.1139/l99-05010.1139/l99-050 ↗
17. RBK 1.1 RTD 1006:2013, 2013, “Guidelines Assessment Bridges - Assessment of Structural Safety of an Existing Bridge at Reconstruction, Usage and Disapproval,” Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 117 pp. (in Dutch)
18. Reineck, K.-H., 2009, “Review of Basic Assumptions for the Shear Design,” Thomas T.C. Hsu Symposium: Shear and Torsion in Concrete Structures, New Orleans, LA, pp. 367-384.
19. Roosen, M. A.; van der Veen, C.; Hordijk, D. A.; and Hendriks, M. A. N., 2019a, “Resistance to Diagonal Tension Cracking of Single Span Prestressed Girders,” Seventh International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation (SEMC 2019), Cape Town, South Africa, Sept., pp. 1345-1349.10.1201/9780429426506-232 ↗
20. Roosen, M. A.; van der Veen, C.; Hordijk, D. A.; and Hendriks, M. A. N., 2019b, “Shear Tension Resistance of Prestressed Girders with a Low Stirrup Ratio,” Seventh International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation (SEMC 2019), Sept., Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 2186-2191.10.1201/9780429426506-377 ↗
21. Rupf, M.; Fernández Ruiz, M.; and Muttoni, A., 2013, “Post-Tensioned Girders with Low Amounts of Shear Reinforcement: Shear Strength and Influence of Flanges,” Engineering Structures, V. 56, Nov., pp. 357-371.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.024 ↗
22. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., 1986, “The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced-Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 219-231.10.14359/10416 ↗