DataVXResearch in Nondestructive EvaluationPaper
journal article·2025-11-02

Impact of Lift-Off on Detected Current Time Signal on Harmonic Analysis Method on the 3MA Prototype NDT Technique

Ghania Yousfi, Hassane Mohellebi, Yasmine Gabi, Bernd Wolter, David Böttger

Research in Nondestructive Evaluation· Volume 36· Issue 5-6
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

This research investigates the impact of the liftoff on the harmonic analysis of induced and detected current around a yoke magnetization coil. The study focuses on two magnetic material grades, D04 and C15E. The finite element method (FEM) is utilized to solve the two-dimensional (2D) electromagnetic equations in a transient step-by-step manner. The non-linear behavior of the ferromagnetic components is modeled using vector hysteresis and also considers the presence of eddy currents. Simulation results of both soft and hard material enable the calculation of total current and magnetic field amplitude across various liftoff states under a fixed voltage amplitude supply. Subsequently, the harmonic analysis of the current signal is performed. Finally, a comparison between simulation and experimental results for both magnetic materials shows a match between FEM simulation and experimental findings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression · Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements · Advanced Power Amplifier Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou

Fraunhofer Institute for Nondestructive Testing IZFP

Saarland University

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-662-02363-1_4910.1007/978-3-662-02363-1_49 ↗
2. 10.1533/9780857099228.3.27310.1533/9780857099228.3.273 ↗
3. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822548-6.00115-110.1016/B978-0-12-822548-6.00115-1 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11740-023-01254-y10.1007/s11740-023-01254-y ↗
5. 10.3390/app906106810.3390/app9061068 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41598-024-55927-410.1038/s41598-024-55927-4 ↗
7. W. A. Theiner, J. Grossmann, and W. Repplinger, Deutsche Gesellschaft fürZerstörungs freiePrüfung e.V, Berlin, Germany (1979–1980), pp. 17–19.
8. 10.3390/app1509496910.3390/app15094969 ↗
9. 10.1515/mt-2021-201210.1515/mt-2021-2012 ↗
10. 10.3390/ma1705110610.3390/ma17051106 ↗
11. W. A. Theiner et al. Proc. Non-DestructiveTesting in Nuclear Technology, German Society for Non-DestructiveTesting (DGZfP), Berlin, Germany, 25–27 (1981). pp. 328–329.
12. W. A. Theiner et al. in Proceedings of the 4th Internationale Konferenz über Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung in der Kerntechnik, Lindau, Germany, 1 Apr. 1981. pp. 329–336.
13. 10.1007/978-3-642-84003-6_7510.1007/978-3-642-84003-6_75 ↗
14. U. Laub and I. Altpeter, in Proceedings of the 7th European Conference of Non-Destructive Testing, Vol. 2, pp. 1094–1101 (1998).
15. 10.1784/insi.2014.56.10.55310.1784/insi.2014.56.10.553 ↗
16. G. Dobmann, “Physical Basics and Industrial Applications of 3MA–Micromagnetic Multiparameter Microstructure and Stress Analysis” (Fraunhofer IZFP, Saarbrcken, Germany 2007), pp. 1–17.
17. 10.5772/intechopen.9074010.5772/intechopen.90740 ↗
18. 10.3233/978-1-61499-407-7-5210.3233/978-1-61499-407-7-52 ↗
19. S. Youssef et al. in 12th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, ECNDT 2018. Gothenburg, Sweden, 11–15 June 2018; CD-ROM.
20. 10.2314/KXP:175768040310.2314/KXP:1757680403 ↗
21. B. Wolter et al. in 12th International Conference on Barkhausen Noise and Micromagnetic Testing (ICBM-12), Dresden, Germany, 24–26 September 2017. pp. 25–26.
22. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822548-6.00115-110.1016/B978-0-12-822548-6.00115-1 ↗
23. 10.3390/s2422710310.3390/s24227103 ↗
24. 10.31526/lhep10.31526/lhep ↗
25. Y. Gabi Doctoral Thesis. Grenoble University 2012.
26. 10.1016/B978-012480874-4/50019-110.1016/B978-012480874-4/50019-1 ↗
27. 10.1109/TMAG.2013.228593610.1109/TMAG.2013.2285936 ↗
28. Y. Gabi et al. 11th In European Conference on NDT, Prague, 2014.
29. 10.1109/cistem.2018.861340610.1109/cistem.2018.8613406 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.499366910.1063/1.4993669 ↗
31. Y. Gabi et al. in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Nondestructive Testing, ECNDT 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2018, pp. 11–15.
32. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.04.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2019.04.001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16525010.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165250 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2019.03.006 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16669510.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166695 ↗
36. 10.3390/en1508286910.3390/en15082869 ↗
37. 10.24406/publica-586310.24406/publica-5863 ↗
38. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.91617010.1109/TMAG.2007.916170 ↗
39. D. Karaboga Technical Report –TR06 pp. 1–10. Oct. 2005.
40. 10.1109/20.87766510.1109/20.877665 ↗
41. 10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-110.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1 ↗
42. 10.1108/0332164041051079410.1108/03321640410510794 ↗
43. 10.1109/20.11981310.1109/20.119813 ↗
44. L. Mikula et al. in 10ème Conférence Européenne sur les Méthodes Numériques en Electromagnétisme (NUMELEC 2024) Toulouse France 8 July 2024.
45. A. T. Vo et al. in Conférence SGE 2023 (Symposium de Génie Electrique) Lille France 5 July2023.
46. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.04210.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.042 ↗
47. 10.4236/jcc.2014.2401710.4236/jcc.2014.24017 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16672410.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166724 ↗
49. 10.24406/publica-fhg-38516910.24406/publica-fhg-385169 ↗
50. 10.15199/48.2021.12.0710.15199/48.2021.12.07 ↗