journal article·2021-03-08Open access

Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs with porcine small intestine submucosa: a 5- year follow-up. a prospective randomized controlled study

Baoshan Li, Xin Zhang, Yi Man, Jiadong Xie, Wei Hu, Huang Huang, Yinlong Wang, Hongguang Ma

Regenerative Biomaterials· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) biologic patch has been used in inguinal hernia repair. However, there are little data available to assess the long-term effect after repair. This study aimed to explore the long-term effect of SIS patch in open inguinal hernia repair. Sevent-six patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were treated with Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair using SIS patch (Beijing Datsing Bio-Tech Co., Ltd.) and Surgisis patch (COOK, USA) in Tianjin Union Medical Center and China-Japan Friendship Hospital. In the trial, the long-term efficacy of the treatment group and the control group were compared. A total of 66 patients in both groups received long-term follow-up (> 5 years) after surgery, with a follow-up rate of 86.8%. During the follow-up period, there was one case of recurrence, one case of chronic pain in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in terms of recurrence, chronic pain, foreign body sensation and infection between the two groups of patients. After long-term observations, it has been found that the porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) biological patch is safe and effective for inguinal hernia Lichtenstein repair, and has a low recurrence rate and complication rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hernia repair and management · Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies · Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, 190, jieyuan Road, HongqiaoDistrict, Tianjin 300121, China

Department of General Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Sakura Garden East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Etiology of inguinal hernias: a comprehensive review10.3389/fsurg.2017.00052 ↗
2. Open mesh repair for inguinal hernia is safer than laparoscopic repair or open non-mesh repair: a nationwide registry study of complications10.1007/s00268-015-3028-2 ↗
3. Current status of hernia and abdominal wall surgery and innovation research and development of repairing materials [J]
4. Biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis10.1111/ans.13234 ↗
5. A new approach for transversalis fascia reinforcement in Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia repair10.1007/s00595-012-0232-7 ↗
6. Inguinal hernia repair with porcine small intestine submucosa: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein's repair with polypropylene mesh versus Surgisis Inguinal Hernia Matrix10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.021 ↗
7. Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.043 ↗
8. Stage III clinical trial on the application of porcine small intestine submucosa mesh in inguinal hernia repair [J]
9. The importance of biological mesh repair in adolescent inguinal hernia repair [J]
10. Early report of a randomized comparative clinical trial of Strattice™ reconstructive tissue matrix to lightweight synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias10.1007/s10029-013-1076-9 ↗
11. Comparison of porcine small intestinal submucosa versus polypropylene in open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1371/journal.pone.0135073 ↗
12. Randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernias with two biologic meshes from porcine small intestine submucosa10.2147/TCRM.S208185 ↗
13. Clinical analysis on the technique of transverse fascia reinforcement with biological mesh in young inguinal hernia patients [J]
14. Absorbable meshes in inguinal hernia surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/1553350617697849 ↗
15. Hernia repair with porcine small-intestinal submucosa10.1007/s10029-007-0225-4 ↗
16. Pure tissue inguinal hernia repair with the use of biological mesh: a 10-year follows up. A prospective study10.1007/s10029-019-01976-y ↗
17. Lichtenstein procedure for inguinal hernia: a single center experience of 5795 cases report[J]
18. Can the wounds after infected meshes removal be sutured primarily: a retrospective study [J]
19. Placement of a non-cross-linked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix during preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair10.9738/CC176 ↗
20. The use of porcine small intestine submucosa implants might be associated with a high recurrence rate following laparoscopic herniorrhaphy10.1016/j.jfma.2013.03.007 ↗