Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs with porcine small intestine submucosa: a 5- year follow-up. a prospective randomized controlled study
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) biologic patch has been used in inguinal hernia repair. However, there are little data available to assess the long-term effect after repair. This study aimed to explore the long-term effect of SIS patch in open inguinal hernia repair. Sevent-six patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were treated with Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair using SIS patch (Beijing Datsing Bio-Tech Co., Ltd.) and Surgisis patch (COOK, USA) in Tianjin Union Medical Center and China-Japan Friendship Hospital. In the trial, the long-term efficacy of the treatment group and the control group were compared. A total of 66 patients in both groups received long-term follow-up (> 5 years) after surgery, with a follow-up rate of 86.8%. During the follow-up period, there was one case of recurrence, one case of chronic pain in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in terms of recurrence, chronic pain, foreign body sensation and infection between the two groups of patients. After long-term observations, it has been found that the porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) biological patch is safe and effective for inguinal hernia Lichtenstein repair, and has a low recurrence rate and complication rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hernia repair and management · Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies · Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, 190, jieyuan Road, HongqiaoDistrict, Tianjin 300121, China
Department of General Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Sakura Garden East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Etiology of inguinal hernias: a comprehensive review10.3389/fsurg.2017.00052 ↗
2. Open mesh repair for inguinal hernia is safer than laparoscopic repair or open non-mesh repair: a nationwide registry study of complications10.1007/s00268-015-3028-2 ↗
3. Current status of hernia and abdominal wall surgery and innovation research and development of repairing materials [J]
4. Biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis10.1111/ans.13234 ↗
5. A new approach for transversalis fascia reinforcement in Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia repair10.1007/s00595-012-0232-7 ↗
6. Inguinal hernia repair with porcine small intestine submucosa: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein's repair with polypropylene mesh versus Surgisis Inguinal Hernia Matrix10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.021 ↗
7. Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.043 ↗
8. Stage III clinical trial on the application of porcine small intestine submucosa mesh in inguinal hernia repair [J]
9. The importance of biological mesh repair in adolescent inguinal hernia repair [J]
10. Early report of a randomized comparative clinical trial of Strattice™ reconstructive tissue matrix to lightweight synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias10.1007/s10029-013-1076-9 ↗
11. Comparison of porcine small intestinal submucosa versus polypropylene in open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1371/journal.pone.0135073 ↗
12. Randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernias with two biologic meshes from porcine small intestine submucosa10.2147/TCRM.S208185 ↗
13. Clinical analysis on the technique of transverse fascia reinforcement with biological mesh in young inguinal hernia patients [J]
14. Absorbable meshes in inguinal hernia surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/1553350617697849 ↗
15. Hernia repair with porcine small-intestinal submucosa10.1007/s10029-007-0225-4 ↗
16. Pure tissue inguinal hernia repair with the use of biological mesh: a 10-year follows up. A prospective study10.1007/s10029-019-01976-y ↗
17. Lichtenstein procedure for inguinal hernia: a single center experience of 5795 cases report[J]
18. Can the wounds after infected meshes removal be sutured primarily: a retrospective study [J]
19. Placement of a non-cross-linked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix during preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair10.9738/CC176 ↗
20. The use of porcine small intestine submucosa implants might be associated with a high recurrence rate following laparoscopic herniorrhaphy10.1016/j.jfma.2013.03.007 ↗