journal article·2007-11

Initial cytotoxicity of novel titanium alloys

M. Koike, P. E. Lockwood, J. C. Wataha, T. Okabe

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We assessed the biological response to several novel titanium alloys that have promising physical properties for biomedical applications. Four commercial titanium alloys [Super‐TIX® 800, Super‐TIX® 51AF, TIMETAL® 21SRx, and Ti‐6Al‐4V (ASTM grade 5)] and three experimental titanium alloys [Ti‐13Cr‐3Cu, Ti‐1.5Si and Ti‐1.5Si‐5Cu] were tested. Specimens (n = 6; 5.0 × 5.0 × 3.0 mm3) were cast in a centrifugal casting machine using a MgO‐based investment and polished to 600 grit, removing 250 μm from each surface. Commercially pure titanium (CP Ti: ASTM grade 2) and Teflon® (polytetrafluoroethylene) were used as positive controls. The specimens were cleaned and disinfected, and then each cleaned specimen was placed in direct contact with Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts for 72 h. The cytotoxicity [succinic dehydrogenase (SDH) activity] of the extracts was assessed using the MTT method. Cytotoxicity of the metals tested was not statistically different compared to the CP Ti and Teflon® controls (p > 0.05). These novel titanium alloys pose cytotoxic risks no greater than many other commonly used alloys, including commercially pure titanium. The promising short‐term biocompatibility of these Ti alloys is probably due to their excellent corrosion resistance under static conditions, even in biological environments. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2007
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/15441113020130010810.1177/154411130201300108 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.0645i.x10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.0645i.x ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02417.x10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02417.x ↗
4. 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00063-X10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00063-X ↗
5. The use of titanium in dentistry
6. 10.1007/s11837-998-0410-710.1007/s11837-998-0410-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00009-910.1016/0142-9612(96)00009-9 ↗
8. Steinemann SG · 1980 · 1
9. Ion release from Ti‐6Al‐7Nb alloy dental castings in 1A0% lactic acid
10. Castability and mechanical properties of Ti‐6Al‐7Nb alloy dental‐cast
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.005 ↗
12. 10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01083.x10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01083.x ↗
13. 10.1361/105994905X7560010.1361/105994905X75600 ↗
14. Mechanical properties of cast Ti‐Si alloys
15. Effect of copper on the mechanical properties of Ti‐Si alloys
16. 10.1016/j.msec.2005.04.00210.1016/j.msec.2005.04.002 ↗
17. Grindability of cast Ti‐Fe‐Al alloys
18. Okabe T · 1998 · 207
19. 10.1067/mpr.2001.11705610.1067/mpr.2001.117056 ↗
20. 10.31399/asm.tb.ttg2.978162708269310.31399/asm.tb.ttg2.9781627082693 ↗
21. International Standards Organization · 1993
22. 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90056-I10.1016/0109-5641(92)90056-I ↗
23. 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90025-610.1016/0109-5641(94)90025-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80020-010.1016/S0109-5641(96)80020-0 ↗
25. Correlation between cytotoxicity and the elements released by dental casting alloys
26. 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70018-610.1016/S0022-3913(98)70018-6 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00235-410.1016/S0142-9612(97)00235-4 ↗
28. 10.4012/dmj.24.61010.4012/dmj.24.610 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1389-0344(02)00032-110.1016/S1389-0344(02)00032-1 ↗