journal article·2008-04

An examination of fatigue striations in human dentin: In vitro and in vivo

D. Bajaj, N. Sundaram, D. Arola

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Although striations are often used in evaluating fatigue crack growth in engineering materials, they have not been used in studying the mechanics of fracture in hard tissues. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the striations resulting from fatigue crack growth in the dentin of human teeth. Compact tension (CT) specimens obtained from the coronal dentin of molars from young (17 ≤ age ≤ 37 years) and senior (age ≥ 50 years) patients were subjected to cyclic Mode I loads. Striations evident on the fracture surfaces were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and contact profilometer. Fatigue crack growth striations that developed in vivo were also examined on fracture surfaces of restored molars. A power spectrum analysis of surface profiles from the CT specimens showed that the striation spacing ranged from 50 to 170 μm. The average spacing in the dentin of seniors (130 ± 23 μm) was significantly larger (p < 0.001) than that in young dentin (88 ± 13 μm). Fatigue striations in the restored teeth exhibited features that were consistent with those that developed in vitro and a spacing ranging from 59 to 95 μm. Unlike metals, the striations in dentin developed after a period of cyclic loading that ranged from 1 × 103 to 1 × 105 cycles. A quantitative evaluation of the striation spacing using the Bates‐Clark equation suggested that cyclic crack growth within the restored teeth occurred at a stress intensity range near 0.7 MPa·m0.5, and a stress range of ∼12 MPa. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2008
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rsta.1903.000610.1098/rsta.1903.0006 ↗
2. Discussion of a century ago concerning the nature of fatigue, and review of some of the subsequent researches concerning the mechanism of fatigue
3. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00051-310.1016/S0142-1123(03)00051-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/1044-5803(94)90046-910.1016/1044-5803(94)90046-9 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10704-005-6024-y10.1007/s10704-005-6024-y ↗
6. Forsyth PJE · 1969
7. 10.1023/A:101865591705110.1023/A:1018655917051 ↗
8. 10.1016/0300-5712(89)90156-510.1016/0300-5712(89)90156-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90124-U10.1016/0300-5712(92)90124-U ↗
10. 10.1023/A:102643582196010.1023/A:1026435821960 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.a.1055310.1002/jbm.a.10553 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0241214210.1007/BF02412142 ↗
13. Ten Cate AR · 1998
14. 10.4012/dmj.16.15610.4012/dmj.16.156 ↗
15. 10.1002/jbm.a.1008910.1002/jbm.a.10089 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00458-710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00458-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.05110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.051 ↗
18. 10.1177/15440591040830030510.1177/154405910408300305 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.03510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.035 ↗
20. 10.1002/jbm.a.3026910.1002/jbm.a.30269 ↗
21. 10.1002/jbm.a.1000510.1002/jbm.a.10005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.004 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11340-006-9024-610.1007/s11340-006-9024-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00327-510.1016/S0021-9290(02)00327-5 ↗
25. ASTM E647 · 2000
26. ASTM E399 · 2000
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.029 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
29. Brigham EO · 1988
30. 10.1520/STP47362S10.1520/STP47362S ↗
31. Fractography and fracture mechanics
32. Hertzberg RW · 1996
33. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2578-710.1007/978-1-4899-2578-7 ↗
34. 10.1177/0022034594073006120110.1177/00220345940730061201 ↗
35. 10.1177/15441113030140010310.1177/154411130301400103 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.017 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00036-110.1016/S0300-5712(00)00036-1 ↗