journal article·2025-11

How Mechanical Properties of Ureteral Stent Material Affect Its Service Life

Achmad Syaifudin, Zafarel Zeta Averil, Maulana Y. Izzuddin, Amaliya Rasyida, Siti Nurkhamiddah, Lukman Hakim, Katsuhiko Sasaki

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ureteral stents are flexible implants commonly made from polyurethane and silicone. Some ureteral stents used in Indonesia experience damage upon removal, even when patients arrive on time for stent removal. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the mechanical properties of ureteral stent materials on their service life. The tests conducted included tensile testing and material composition analysis using two different Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) devices. In addition, to determine the presence of material mixtures, composition testing was also performed using SEM/EDX. Five samples of ureteral stent products commonly available in Indonesia were selected for this study: two samples with a service life of 2 months, one sample with a 6‐month service life, and two samples with a 12‐month service life. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) testing was carried out to confirm correlations between the investigated variables. The results showed that there was no significant effect of the material's mechanical properties, either tensile strength or elastic modulus, on the service life of the ureteral stent. The results showed no statistically significant correlation ( p > 0.05) between tensile strength or elastic modulus and service life. Instead, material choice should match intended duration: polyurethane for short‐term (< 6 months) and silicone for long‐term (> 6 months). Recommended minimum tensile strength is 11.81 MPa for silicone and 9.11 MPa for polyurethane. These results provide practical guidance for designing ureteral stents based on service life rather than mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments · Ureteral procedures and complications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia

Center for Appropriate Technology, Directorate of Research and Community Service Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia

Department of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia

Department of Chemical Engineering Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga Surabaya Indonesia

Division of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ijms2214770510.3390/ijms22147705 ↗
2. 10.1111/iju.1411910.1111/iju.14119 ↗
3. 10.18051/UnivMed.2021.v40.226‐23310.18051/UnivMed.2021.v40.226‐233 ↗
4. 10.1089/08927790376544429410.1089/089277903765444294 ↗
5. K.Zhang H.Cui H.Jiang et al. The Current Status and Applications of Ureteral Stents 2020 https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:227070250.
6. 10.3390/jcm1110274610.3390/jcm11102746 ↗
7. 10.1097/MOU.000000000000057710.1097/MOU.0000000000000577 ↗
8. 10.1016/s0094‐0143(21)01593‐710.1016/s0094‐0143(21)01593‐7 ↗
9. 10.5173/ceju.2023.21810.5173/ceju.2023.218 ↗
10. 10.2147/RRU.S23398110.2147/RRU.S233981 ↗
11. 10.1089/end.2011.013810.1089/end.2011.0138 ↗
12. 10.4328/JCAM.268410.4328/JCAM.2684 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.eucr.2019.10087110.1016/j.eucr.2019.100871 ↗
14. D. F.Williams Assessing the Triad of Biocompatibility Medical Device Functionality and Biological Safety 2020 https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:229508785.10.1002/mds3.10150 ↗
15. 10.1109/MPUL.2013.226213910.1109/MPUL.2013.2262139 ↗
16. W. D.Callister Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction 6th Edition 2002 https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:201307527.
17. ASTM F1828‐17 · 2017 · 1
18. Abidi N. · 2022
19. 10.1016/S0142‐9612(97)00070‐710.1016/S0142‐9612(97)00070‐7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12642410.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126424 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0026310.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00263 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsabm.3c0117710.1021/acsabm.3c01177 ↗
23. ASTM D412‐16R21 · 2006 · 1
24. ASTM E573‐01 · 2021 · 1
25. Blank L. · 1982
26. 10.1016/j.crci.2016.10.00210.1016/j.crci.2016.10.002 ↗
27. 10.4111/icu.2022039310.4111/icu.20220393 ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.a.3071410.1002/jbm.a.30714 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-3-031-04484-710.1007/978-3-031-04484-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.00610.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.006 ↗
31. 10.1080/17434440.2023.219870210.1080/17434440.2023.2198702 ↗
32. 10.3390/antibiotics301008710.3390/antibiotics3010087 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00216‐009‐3201‐210.1007/s00216‐009‐3201‐2 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0142‐9418(01)00124‐610.1016/S0142‐9418(01)00124‐6 ↗
35. 10.1097/JU.000000000000134310.1097/JU.0000000000001343 ↗
36. 10.1016/s0022‐5347(17)35928‐110.1016/s0022‐5347(17)35928‐1 ↗