Design, Manufacturing and Physicochemical Validation of a New Biodegradable Intraurethral Device for Post‐Operative Urethral Stricture Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Urethral stricture is the narrowing of the urethra caused by the growth of aberrant tissue after an injury. Actual post‐operative treatment requires the placement of a Foley catheter for external urinary drainage after surgery. However, it requires a second intervention for removal, and the contact with the external environment and non‐biodegradable composition even aggravates urinary tract infections (UTIs) in 7.12% of patients. Thus, we developed a completely biodegradable intraurethral device (BID) as an alternative to catheterization. BID is a continuous‐walled hollow tubular stent with outer wall corrugations composed of poly( d , l ‐lactide‐ co ‐ε‐caprolactone) copolymer synthesized by ring‐opening polymerization, using a bismuth‐based catalyst. Complying with EU Medical Device Regulation 2017/745, BID was manufactured by injection molding following ISO 13485 and irradiated by e‐beam, according to ISO 11137 and 11737. Physico‐chemical characterization was evaluated following ISO 10993, showing a scalable synthetic procedure with reproducible composition, high molecular weight, adequate thermal properties, and metal content below its cytotoxic level. Scanning electron microscopic analysis confirmed consistent dimensions and no detrimental effect in the device after irradiation. Additionally, hydrolytic degradation studies (static and dynamic) showed complete degradation of BID after 90 days, obtained by the tailored composition of the synthesized copolymer and aligned with the tissue regeneration process. Mechanical properties confirmed a consistent tubular shape up to 28 days and no migration of the device even at a maximum urine flow of 1500 mL/min thanks to the tailored corrugated design of BID. These findings position BID as a promising alternative in post‐operative urethral stricture management, addressing critical limitations of current practices. Hopefully, our BID might provide a biodegradable solution, minimizing UTIs and migration, and eliminating the current second intervention for catheter removal.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urological Disorders and Treatments · Ureteral procedures and complications · Hernia repair and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Polimerbio SL Donostia‐San Sebastián Spain
Funding
Eusko Jaurlaritza · Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial
References (96)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41598‐024‐55408‐810.1038/s41598‐024‐55408‐8 ↗
2. 10.3238/arztebl.2013.022010.3238/arztebl.2013.0220 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.08710.1016/j.juro.2016.07.087 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.00910.1016/j.urology.2013.09.009 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.01010.1016/j.juro.2011.07.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65295-910.1016/S0022-5347(01)65295-9 ↗
7. 10.1308/rcsann.2023.000310.1308/rcsann.2023.0003 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.a.3149210.1002/jbm.a.31492 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.aju.2012.12.00510.1016/j.aju.2012.12.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/B978-0-12-802406-5.00003-310.1016/B978-0-12-802406-5.00003-3 ↗
11. 10.5173/ceju.2023.21810.5173/ceju.2023.218 ↗
12. 10.3390/vetsci901001310.3390/vetsci9010013 ↗
13. 10.3389/fbioe.2024.137313010.3389/fbioe.2024.1373130 ↗
14. 10.1021/bm025717o10.1021/bm025717o ↗
15. 10.1089/end.2019.049310.1089/end.2019.0493 ↗
16. 10.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00021-810.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00021-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.014 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1422492410.3390/polym14224924 ↗
19. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.61714110.3389/fbioe.2021.617141 ↗
20. 10.3390/polym1209201010.3390/polym12092010 ↗
21. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.113607710.3389/fbioe.2023.1136077 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.08.00210.1016/j.engreg.2020.08.002 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00289‐021‐03865‐w10.1007/s00289‐021‐03865‐w ↗
24. 10.1116/6.000042910.1116/6.0000429 ↗
25. 10.1111/jam.1429010.1111/jam.14290 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10404010.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104040 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1315241210.3390/polym13152412 ↗
28. 10.1039/D2RA06831A10.1039/D2RA06831A ↗
29. Injection Molding and 3D Printers
30. 10.1021/acsabm.2c0079310.1021/acsabm.2c00793 ↗
31. 10.1007/s40264‐019‐00878‐310.1007/s40264‐019‐00878‐3 ↗
32. Europa Regulation (EU) 2017/745(2017) https://eur‐lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj.
33. International Standard Organization Medical devices—Quality Management Systems—Requirements for Regulatory Purposes (ISO 13485:2016)(2016) https://www.iso.org/standard/59752.html.
34. International Standard Organization Packaging for Terminally Sterilized Medical Devices (ISO 11607:2019)(2019) https://www.iso.org/standard/70799.html.
35. International Standard Organization Sterilization of Health Care Products—Radiation Part 1: Requirements for Development Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medical Devices (ISO 11137‐1:2006)(2006) https://www.iso.org/es/contents/data/standard/03/39/33952.html.
36. International Standard Organization Sterilization of Health Care Products—Microbiological Methods Part 1: Determination of a Population of Microorganisms on Products (ISO 11737‐1:2018)(2018) https://www.iso.org/standard/66451.html.
37. International Standard Organization Sterilization of Health Care Products—Radiation Part 2: Establishing the Sterilization Dose (ISO 11137‐2:2013)(2013) https://www.iso.org/es/contents/data/standard/06/24/62442.html?browse=tc.
38. International Standard Organization ISO 11737‐2:2019 Sterilization of Health Care Products—Microbiological Methods Part 2: Tests of Sterility Performed in the Definition Validation and Maintenance of a Sterilization Process (ISO 11737‐2:2019)(2019) https://www.iso.org/standard/70801.html.
39. International Standard Organization Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 18: Chemical Characterization of Medical Device Materials Within a Risk Management Process (ISO 10993‐18:2020)(2020) https://www.iso.org/standard/64750.html.
40. International Standard Organization Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 19: Physico‐Chemical Morphological and Topographical Characterization of Materials (ISO/TS 10993–19:2020)(2020) https://www.iso.org/es/contents/data/standard/07/51/75138.html.
41. International Standard Organization Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 13: Identification and Quantification of Degradation Products From Polymeric Medical Devices (ISO 10993‐13:2010)(2010) https://www.iso.org/standard/44050.html.
42. 10.1177/159101991983384310.1177/1591019919833843 ↗
43. International Standard Organization Sterile Urethral Catheters for Single Use (ISO 20696:2018)(2018) https://www.iso.org/es/contents/data/standard/06/88/68854.html?browse=tc.
44. 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.07.00110.1016/j.ucl.2013.07.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0939‐6411(99)00034‐X10.1016/S0939‐6411(99)00034‐X ↗
46. 10.4314/ijest.v2i2.5913310.4314/ijest.v2i2.59133 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.16410.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.164 ↗
48. 10.3390/polym1401002310.3390/polym14010023 ↗
49. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823023-7.00001-010.1016/B978-0-12-823023-7.00001-0 ↗
50. Nelson K. · 2015 · 119
51. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.02010.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.020 ↗
52. 10.1017/ice.2017.30110.1017/ice.2017.301 ↗
53. 10.22207/JPAM.14.3.4610.22207/JPAM.14.3.46 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.10.01410.1016/j.ajic.2006.10.014 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.10548110.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105481 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.03110.1016/j.msec.2016.07.031 ↗
57. 10.1007/s10924‐020‐01972‐910.1007/s10924‐020‐01972‐9 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.nimb.2020.06.00810.1016/j.nimb.2020.06.008 ↗
59. 10.1002/mabi.20200037910.1002/mabi.202000379 ↗
60. 10.1089/ten.TEA.2018.013010.1089/ten.TEA.2018.0130 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10566310.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105663 ↗
62. 10.1002/pen.2088210.1002/pen.20882 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.rinma.2020.10014910.1016/j.rinma.2020.100149 ↗
64. 10.1007/s12262‐012‐0549‐x10.1007/s12262‐012‐0549‐x ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.07810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.078 ↗
66. 10.3390/polym1509204710.3390/polym15092047 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.10462810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104628 ↗
68. 10.3390/polym1414279010.3390/polym14142790 ↗
69. 10.1016/B978-0-323-37468-2.00002-610.1016/B978-0-323-37468-2.00002-6 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12632510.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126325 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.002 ↗
72. 10.1002/mame.20210060210.1002/mame.202100602 ↗
73. 10.1002/adfm.20080132710.1002/adfm.200801327 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.019 ↗
75. 10.3390/molecules19091525810.3390/molecules190915258 ↗
76. Yang N. · 2011 · 414
77. 10.3390/ijms2503160010.3390/ijms25031600 ↗
78. 10.1016/0016‐5085(90)90983‐810.1016/0016‐5085(90)90983‐8 ↗
79. 10.3390/polym1324446010.3390/polym13244460 ↗
80. 10.3390/molecules2815592110.3390/molecules28155921 ↗
81. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0042410.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.12.01910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.12.019 ↗
83. 10.1002/jbm.b.3508610.1002/jbm.b.35086 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.10155610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101556 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.00810.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.008 ↗
86. 10.1089/end.2005.008510.1089/end.2005.0085 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.01510.1016/j.juro.2010.06.015 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.eucr.2019.10085410.1016/j.eucr.2019.100854 ↗
89. 10.1155/2021/995907410.1155/2021/9959074 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.10148210.1016/j.eucr.2020.101482 ↗
91. 10.1002/jbm.a.3503610.1002/jbm.a.35036 ↗
92. 10.1111/j.1464‐410x.1989.tb05518.x10.1111/j.1464‐410x.1989.tb05518.x ↗
93. 10.21037/tau.2019.08.1610.21037/tau.2019.08.16 ↗
94. 10.7759/cureus.3038510.7759/cureus.30385 ↗
95. Management of Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture—A 54 Patients Study With Allium Bulbar Urethral Stent (BUS)
96. 10.1590/S1677‐5538.IBJU.2014.01.1210.1590/S1677‐5538.IBJU.2014.01.12 ↗