Study on bone quality in the human mandible—Alignment of biological apatite crystallites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The importance of considering bone quality during oral implant treatment is increasingly being recognized. Assessment of bone quality in response to changes in the jaw bone is extremely important when planning treatment. The present study analyzed biological apatite (BAp) crystallites, a bone quality factor, in order to investigate crystallographic anisotropy in dentate and edentulous human mandibles. Using mandibular samples from Japanese adult cadavers, a region of interest was established comprising cortical bone in the central incisors. Samples were classified into five morphological categories based on the extent of bone resorption. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured and diffraction intensity ratios were calculated using a microbeam X‐ray diffraction system. While no differences were observed in BMD, differences were observed in BAp crystallite alignment between the measurement points. In the alveolar region, samples with residual alveolar bone showed strong alignment in the occlusal direction, while samples with marked alveolar bone resorption had preferential alignment in the mesiodistal direction. The present findings suggest that tooth loss and the extent of alveolar bone resorption affects bone quality in the mandible. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 838–846, 2019.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Bone health and osteoporosis research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College Tokyo Japan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology Tokyo Dental College Tokyo Japan
Department of Anatomy Tokyo Dental College Tokyo Japan
Department of Removable Partial Prosthodontics Tokyo Dental College Tokyo Japan
Division of Materials & Manufacturing Science, Graduate School of Engineering Osaka University Osaka Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.morpho.2016.02.00210.1016/j.morpho.2016.02.002 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x ↗
3. Analysis of risk factors for cluster behavior of dental implant failures
4. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01077.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01077.x ↗
5. 10.1001/jama.285.6.78510.1001/jama.285.6.785 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.02010.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.020 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00198-011-1573-610.1007/s00198-011-1573-6 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00223990024410.1007/s002239900244 ↗
9. 10.2320/matertrans.MER200816010.2320/matertrans.MER2008160 ↗
10. Structure and chemistry of the apatites and other calcium orthophosphates
11. 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00850-510.1016/S8756-3282(02)00850-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00194-710.1016/S8756-3282(03)00194-7 ↗
13. 10.1179/crn.2012.00510.1179/crn.2012.005 ↗
14. 10.2320/matertrans.M201132910.2320/matertrans.M2011329 ↗
15. 10.2485/jhtb.25.23310.2485/jhtb.25.233 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00276-005-0323-x10.1007/s00276-005-0323-x ↗
17. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100503.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100503.x ↗
18. 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-0005910.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00059 ↗
19. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures
20. 10.1016/0022-3913(71)90070-910.1016/0022-3913(71)90070-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70245-810.1016/S0022-3913(98)70245-8 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x ↗
23. 10.1016/S1348-8643(10)80009-610.1016/S1348-8643(10)80009-6 ↗
24. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19220233.x10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19220233.x ↗
25. 10.1016/j.odw.2007.10.00210.1016/j.odw.2007.10.002 ↗
26. 10.2320/matertrans.M201622810.2320/matertrans.M2016228 ↗
27. 10.1097/ID.000000000000046810.1097/ID.0000000000000468 ↗
28. 10.2485/jhtb.14.36310.2485/jhtb.14.363 ↗
29. 10.1002/jbmr.182510.1002/jbmr.1825 ↗
30. Dental implant‐tissue response in situ‐new pathema in wound healing‐
31. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x ↗
32. Consensus statements consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols
33. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri‐implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis
34. 10.2485/jhtb.24.23510.2485/jhtb.24.235 ↗