journal article·2014-04

The in vivo effect of P‐15 coating on early osseointegration

Paulo G. Coelho, Hellen S. Teixeira, Charles Marin, Lukasz Witek, Nick Tovar, Malvin N. Janal, Ryo Jimbo

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate mechanically and morphologically the effect of a specific peptide sequence P‐15, when incorporated into implant surfaces. Three types of implants were used for the study: Group A: commercially pure titanium implant (blasted and acid etched) + electrochemical thin calcium phosphate deposition, Group B: commercially pure titanium implant (blasted and acid etched) + electrochemical thin calcium phosphate deposition + P‐15 incorporation, and as control, Group C: commercially pure titanium implant (blasted and acid etched). After a topographical characterization, transcortical osteotomies were made, and all implant groups (102 implants per group) were randomly placed bilaterally in the tibiae of adult beagle dogs (n = 24). At, 1, 2, and 4 weeks post‐surgery, the animals were sacrificed and the samples were retrieved for removal torque tests, for nano indentation, and for histomorphometrical analysis. The results (mean ± 95% CI) showed that Group B (34.4 ± 8.7%) presented statistically higher bone‐to‐implant contact than the other groups (A = 23.9 ± 7.8%; C = 21.7 ± 8.3%) at 1 week, indicating an enhanced osteogenesis due to the peptide incorporation. The results suggested that the incorporation of P‐15 to implant surfaces increased its bioactivity and the effects were notable especially in the early stages of the healing process. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 430–440, 2014.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University College of Dentistry New York

Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry New York University College of Dentistry New York

Department of Postgraduate Program in Dentistry UNIGRANRIO Duque de Caxias Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Department of Chemical Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater

Department of Epidemiology and Health promotion New York University College of Dentistry New York

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology Malmo University Sweden

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1‐‐review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them
2. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2‐‐review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces
3. 10.1177/15440591040830070410.1177/154405910408300704 ↗
4. 10.1177/15440591060850061610.1177/154405910608500616 ↗
5. deGroot K KC · 1990 · 17
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.029 ↗
7. 10.1097/00008505-199807040-0001010.1097/00008505-199807040-00010 ↗
8. 10.1563/0712.110.1563/0712.1 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.05310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.053 ↗
10. The effects of ion beam‐assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit‐blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.02510.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.11.00810.1016/j.ijom.2012.11.008 ↗
13. 10.1155/2012/57927410.1155/2012/579274 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.69710.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.039 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01603.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01603.x ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.b.3018310.1002/jbm.b.30183 ↗
18. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130312.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130312.x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.014 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.02310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.023 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.036 ↗
22. 10.1089/ten.1999.5.5310.1089/ten.1999.5.53 ↗
23. Periodontal regeneration following use of ABM/P‐1 5: A case report
24. 10.1002/jor.2211610.1002/jor.22116 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02455.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02455.x ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01904.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01904.x ↗
27. 10.1007/978-0-387-77718-4_910.1007/978-0-387-77718-4_9 ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.a.1033010.1002/jbm.a.10330 ↗
29. Implant with a biofunctionalized surface and method for its production
30. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x ↗
31. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01640.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01640.x ↗
32. 10.1177/0022034598077003060110.1177/00220345980770030601 ↗
33. 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00268-410.1016/S8756-3282(00)00268-4 ↗
34. 10.1115/1.207367110.1115/1.2073671 ↗
35. A method for interpreting the data from depth‐sensing indentation instruments
36. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02074.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02074.x ↗
37. 10.1002/jbm.b.3126410.1002/jbm.b.31264 ↗
38. 10.1097/ID.0b013e31822b9c3910.1097/ID.0b013e31822b9c39 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.01010.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.010 ↗
40. 10.1177/002203451246324010.1177/0022034512463240 ↗