Phase transformation behaviors and mechanical properties of Ti 50 Ni 49 Fe 1 alloy with severe plastic deformation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, transformation behaviors and mechanical properties of cold‐rolled shape memory alloy Ti 50 Ni 49 Fe 1 by severe plastic deformation (SPD) were intensively investigated. The phase transformation behaviors, phase analysis, and microstructures were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), respectively. Tensile testing was performed to analyze the effect of SPD on the mechanical properties and shape memory of Ti 50 Ni 49 Fe 1 alloy. When the thickness reduction is beyond 30 %, the martensitic transformation is suppressed. After cold‐rolling, the alloy is mainly composed of B2 parent phases with some stress‐induced martensitic B19′ phases, and high density of dislocations are generated and the grains are obviously refined. The yield stress σ b significantly raises from 618 MPa of 0 % cold rolling to 1,338 MPa of 50 % SPD. Shape‐memory effect increases from 6.5 % without cold rolling to 8.5 % after 30 % SPD, ascribed to the induced defects in cold rolling. Those results indicate that Ti 50 Ni 49 Fe 1 alloy has improved mechanical properties and potential commercial applications after SPD.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Science and Technology Information General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals 100088 Beijing China
School of Material Science and Engineering Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 100191 Beijing China
Metrology and Phsico‐Chemical Institute Capital Aerospace Machinery Company 100076 Beijing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Otsuka K · 1998 · 49
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.01810.1016/j.msea.2009.01.018 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.05910.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.059 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.00910.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0079‐6425(99)00007‐910.1016/S0079‐6425(99)00007‐9 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.10.02610.1016/j.msea.2008.10.026 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359‐6454(02)00315‐410.1016/S1359‐6454(02)00315‐4 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat118010.1038/nmat1180 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0965‐9773(99)00061‐610.1016/S0965‐9773(99)00061‐6 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0965‐9773(99)00223‐810.1016/S0965‐9773(99)00223‐8 ↗
12. 10.2320/matertrans.47.79510.2320/matertrans.47.795 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.13110.1016/j.msea.2006.02.131 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11041‐005‐0049‐810.1007/s11041‐005‐0049‐8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.11010.1016/j.msea.2006.01.110 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.03610.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.036 ↗
17. The cleavage strength of polycrystals