journal article·2016-08Open access

Implant design and its effects on osseointegration over time within cortical and trabecular bone

Bryan G. Beutel, Natalie R. Danna, Rodrigo Granato, Estevam A. Bonfante, Charles Marin, Nick Tovar, Marcelo Suzuki, Paulo G. Coelho

Abstract

Abstract Healing chambers present at the interface between implant and bone have become a target for improving osseointegration. The objective of the present study was to compare osseointegration of several implant healing chamber configurations at early time points and regions of interest within bone using an in vivo animal femur model. Six implants, each with a different healing chamber configuration, were surgically implanted into each femur of six skeletally mature beagle dogs (n = 12 implants per dog, total n = 72). The implants were harvested at 3 and 5 weeks post‐implantation, non‐decalcified processed to slides, and underwent histomorphometry with measurement of bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupied (BAFO) within healing chambers at both cortical and trabecular bone sites. Microscopy demonstrated predominantly woven bone at 3 weeks and initial replacement of woven bone by lamellar bone by 5 weeks. BIC and BAFO were both significantly increased by 5 weeks (p < 0.001), and significantly higher in cortical than trabecular bone (p < 0.001). The trapezoidal healing chamber design demonstrated a higher BIC than other configurations. Overall, a strong temporal and region‐specific dependence of implant osseointegration in femurs was noted. Moreover, the findings suggest that a trapezoidal healing chamber configuration may facilitate the best osseointegration. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1091–1097, 2016.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University New York New York 10010

Department of Dentistry UNIGRANRIO University, School of Health Sciences 25071‐202 Duque de Caxias, Rua da Lapa, 86 Centro RJ Brazil

Department of Prosthodontics University of Sao Paulo Bauru College of Dentistry Al. Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisola, 9‐75 Bauru Sao Paulo 17012‐901 Brazil

Department of Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts 02111

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.08.01710.1016/j.hcl.2012.08.017 ↗
2. 10.1097/00003086-199810001-0001510.1097/00003086-199810001-00015 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.00710.1016/j.dental.2014.10.007 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.b.3126410.1002/jbm.b.31264 ↗
5. 10.1088/1748-6041/9/6/06500710.1088/1748-6041/9/6/065007 ↗
6. 10.2147/IJN.S6586610.2147/IJN.S65866 ↗
7. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826e37a210.1097/BOT.0b013e31826e37a2 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.abb.2014.06.03310.1016/j.abb.2014.06.033 ↗
9. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01640.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01640.x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.05010.1016/j.joms.2010.02.050 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01853.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01853.x ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0234421310.1007/BF02344213 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.3209710.1002/jbm.a.32097 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x ↗
16. 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.033310.1089/ten.teb.2014.0333 ↗
17. Early bone healing and biomechanical fixation of dual acid‐etched and as‐machined implants with healing chambers: An experimental study in dogs
18. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00153.x10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00153.x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.06.01610.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.06.016 ↗
20. 10.1586/erd.09.7410.1586/erd.09.74 ↗
21. 10.1098/rsif.2010.0118.focus10.1098/rsif.2010.0118.focus ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.a.3412710.1002/jbm.a.34127 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.02910.1016/j.joms.2011.01.029 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.a.3430410.1002/jbm.a.34304 ↗
25. 10.1902/jop.2010.09029610.1902/jop.2010.090296 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.01.00410.1016/j.tripleo.2010.01.004 ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x ↗
28. 10.1155/2012/60382610.1155/2012/603826 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00186.x10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00186.x ↗
30. 10.1002/jbm.b.3129810.1002/jbm.b.31298 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.06410.1016/j.joms.2009.07.064 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.02110.1016/j.joms.2008.08.021 ↗
33. Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implants: A histologic study in dogs
34. 10.1002/ar.2061910.1002/ar.20619 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90063-310.1016/S0883-5403(99)90063-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.02010.1016/j.bone.2011.08.020 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.04510.1016/j.bone.2013.01.045 ↗