Mechanism of size effects in microcylindrical compression of pure copper considering grain orientation distribution
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In microscale deformation, the magnitudes of specimen and grain sizes are usually identical, and size‐dependent phenomena of deformation behavior occur, namely, size effects. In this study, size effects in microcylindrical compression were investigated experimentally. It was found that, with the increase of grain size and decrease of specimen size, flow stress decreases and inhomogeneous material flow increases. These size effects tend to be more distinct with miniaturization. Thereafter, a modified model considering orientation distribution of surface grains and continuity between surface grains and inner grains is developed to model size effects in microforming. Through finite element simulation, the effects of specimen size, grain size, and orientation of surface grains on the flow stress and inhomogeneous deformation were analyzed. There is a good agreement between experimental and simulation results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Harbin Institute of Technology 150001 Harbin China
Key Laboratory of Micro‐Systems and Micro‐Structures Manufacturing Harbin Institute of Technology 150080 Harbin China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0007‐8506(07)62991‐610.1016/S0007‐8506(07)62991‐6 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0924‐0136(02)00415‐610.1016/S0924‐0136(02)00415‐6 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170‐009‐2411‐210.1007/s00170‐009‐2411‐2 ↗
4. Production of microparts—size effects in bulk metal forming, similarity theory
5. 10.1007/s11740‐007‐0072‐210.1007/s11740‐007‐0072‐2 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.11510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.115 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.00910.1016/j.msea.2010.07.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.01110.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.11.08310.1016/j.msea.2011.11.083 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.031 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.05410.1016/j.msea.2012.01.054 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.01910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.019 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11740‐007‐0034‐810.1007/s11740‐007‐0034‐8 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1003‐6326(06)60023‐X10.1016/S1003‐6326(06)60023‐X ↗
15. 10.1115/1.271458210.1115/1.2714582 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.02.01710.1016/j.commatsci.2008.02.017 ↗
17. 10.1002/pssb.1970039013310.1002/pssb.19700390133 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.09.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2009.09.002 ↗
19. Zugverformung von Kupfer‐Einkristallen 1