Quantitative Evaluation for Structure Difference between Central Region and Periphery in Al-Al Explosive Welding Interface
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Because of lateral sparse wave, there are structure differences between central region and periphery in explosive welding interface. However, academic estimations for the difference of interfaces morphology are still in the qualitative level, and quantitative analysis methods have not been established. This paper tries to evaluate the difference of explosive welding interface morphology quantitatively. First of all, an elastic-viscous model was established to analyze the forming of wavy interface, and symmetrical 2024 Al explosive welding was carried out for testing. Then the interface images of both central district and periphery were detected by three-dimensional ultra-depth microscopy, and a demarcation line for the central area and periphery was defined based on the impact impulse. Furthermore, the fractal dimensions and multi-fractal spectra of the images were calculated on the basis of fractal theory. According to the physics meaning of fractal characters of images, the quantitative descriptions have been achieved for explosive welding interface structure difference.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang · Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J] · 2011 · 211 · 944
2. Chizari · Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J] · 2009 · 209 · 44510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.022 ↗
3. Akbari-Mousavi · Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J] · 2008 · 202 · 22410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.028 ↗
4. Drennov · International Journal of Impact Engineering[J] · 2005 · 32 · 15510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.006 ↗
5. Fehim · Materials and Design[J] · 2011 · 32 · 108110.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.017 ↗
6. Drennov · International Journal of Impact Engineering[J] · 2005 · 32 · 16110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.009 ↗
7. Ben-Artzy · International Journal of Impact Engineering[J] · 2010 · 37 · 39710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.07.008 ↗
8. Bellman · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics[J] · 1954 · 12 · 15110.1090/qam/63198 ↗
9. Lee · European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids[J] · 2015 · 49 · 7710.1016/j.euromechflu.2014.08.001 ↗
10. Mandelbrot · 1982
11. Lysak · Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J] · 2012 · 212 · 15010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.017 ↗
12. Sun · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications[J] · 2002 · 311 · 32710.1016/S0378-4371(02)00820-8 ↗
13. Chen · Physics Letters A[J] · 2005 · 345 · 21810.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.104 ↗
14. Sun · 2003
15. Oldrich · Computers and Mathematics with Applications[J] · 2013 · 66 · 13510.1016/j.camwa.2013.01.017 ↗