journal article·2024-10Open access

In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility of Bacterial Cellulose

Vincent‐Daniel Girard, Jérémie Chaussé, Martin Borduas, Émile Dubuc, Christian Iorio‐Morin, Simon Brisebois, Patrick Vermette

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bacterial cellulose is a unique biomaterial produced by various species of bacteria that offers a range of potential applications in the biomedical field. To provide a cost‐effective alternative to soft‐tissue implants used in cavity infills, remodeling, and subdermal wound healing, in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of native bacterial cellulose were investigated. Cytotoxicity was assessed using a metabolic assay on Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts and INS‐1832/13 rat insulinoma. Results showed no cytotoxicity, whether the cells were seeded over or under the bacterial cellulose scaffolds. Biocompatibility was performed on Sprague–Dawley rats (males and females, 8 weeks old) by implanting bacterial cellulose membranes subcutaneously for 1 or 12 weeks. The explanted scaffolds were then sliced and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological characterization. The first series of results revealed acute and chronic inflammation persisting over 12 weeks. Examination of the explants indicated a high number of granulocytes within the periphery of the bacterial cellulose, suggesting the presence of endotoxins within the membrane, confirmed by a Limulus amebocyte lysate test. This discovery motivated the development of non‐pyrogenic bacterial cellulose scaffolds. Following this, a second series of animal experiments was done, in which materials were implanted for 1 or 2 weeks. The results revealed mild inflammation 1 week after implantation, which then diminished to minimal inflammation after 2 weeks. Altogether, this study highlights that unmodified, purified native bacterial cellulose membranes may be used as a cost‐effective biomedical device provided that proper endotoxin clearance is achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratoire de bio‐ingénierie et de biophysique de l'Université de Sherbrooke, Department of Chemical and Biotechnological Engineering Université de Sherbrooke Québec Canada

Centre de recherche du CHUS, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé Québec Canada

AxCell Laboratories Québec Canada

Department of Pathology Université de Sherbrooke, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé Québec Canada

Department of Surgery Université de Sherbrooke, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé Québec Canada

Funding

Mitacs

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. A.JaconoandA. P.Sclafani “Soft Tissue Implants: Overview Indications Anatomy ”2023 https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/843730‐overview?icd=login_success_email_match_norm#a1.
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.016 ↗
3. 10.1002/adhm.20150000210.1002/adhm.201500002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.01010.1016/j.bone.2005.06.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.04.02110.1016/j.addr.2015.04.021 ↗
6. “Effect of Injectable Alginate Implant on Cardiac Remodeling and Function After Recent and Old Infarcts in Rat|Circulation ” accessed March 6 2023 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727420.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727420 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0928‐4931(00)00134‐X10.1016/S0928‐4931(00)00134‐X ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.00810.1016/j.msec.2013.12.008 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma202035310.3390/ma2020353 ↗
10. 10.1155/2011/83787510.1155/2011/837875 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00253‐011‐3432‐y10.1007/s00253‐011‐3432‐y ↗
12. 10.1111/1751‐7915.1339210.1111/1751‐7915.13392 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049 ↗
14. 10.1002/biot.20190005910.1002/biot.201900059 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.11710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.117 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10924‐021‐02045‐110.1007/s10924‐021‐02045‐1 ↗
17. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1308112510.3390/pharmaceutics13081125 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0141‐3910(97)00197‐310.1016/S0141‐3910(97)00197‐3 ↗
20. Microbial Cellulose: Fermentative Production and Applications
21. 10.1007/s42452‐020‐1982‐210.1007/s42452‐020‐1982‐2 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature0703910.1038/nature07039 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.08.00810.1016/j.ejpb.2013.08.008 ↗
24. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.88155710.3389/fcvm.2022.881557 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10959810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109598 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.03710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.037 ↗
27. 10.5114/aoms.2013.3343310.5114/aoms.2013.33433 ↗
28. 10.1155/2011/17536210.1155/2011/175362 ↗
29. 10.22038/IJBMS.2018.25465.629610.22038/IJBMS.2018.25465.6296 ↗
30. 10.3390/ijms15061085510.3390/ijms150610855 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.8b1208310.1021/acsami.8b12083 ↗
32. 10.1002/jbm.b.3179110.1002/jbm.b.31791 ↗
33. Thermo Fisher Scientific “Pierce LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin Quantitation Kit ”https://assets.fishersci.com/TFS‐Assets/LSG/manuals/MAN0016039_2162445_Pierce_LAL_Chromo_Endotox_Quant_UG.pdf.
34. 10.1002/cpcb.210.1002/cpcb.2 ↗
35. 10.3389/fcell.2020.62388910.3389/fcell.2020.623889 ↗
36. 10.1097/PRS.000000000000119310.1097/PRS.0000000000001193 ↗
37. 10.1097/00006534‐199710000‐0004310.1097/00006534‐199710000‐00043 ↗
38. “ISO 10993‐6: Évaluation biologique des dispositifs médicaux. Partie 6: Essais concernant les effets locaux après l'implantation ”Published online December 1 2016 https://www.iso.org/standard/61089.html.
39. 10.1002/bit.2736210.1002/bit.27362 ↗
40. “ISO 10993‐5: Évaluation biologique des dispositifs médicaux. Partie 5: Essais concernant la cytotoxicité in vitro ”Published online June 1 2009 https://www.iso.org/standard/36406.html.
41. 10.1177/088391150910271010.1177/0883911509102710 ↗
42. 10.3390/ijms2309483510.3390/ijms23094835 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1303041210.3390/polym13030412 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.07610.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0061010.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00610 ↗
46. “3T3‐Swiss albino–CCL‐92|ATCC ”accessed March 6 2023 https://www.atcc.org/products/ccl‐92.
47. 10.1111/jcmm.1255510.1111/jcmm.12555 ↗
48. 10.1128/AEM.03452‐1310.1128/AEM.03452‐13 ↗
49. 10.1007/BF0074993710.1007/BF00749937 ↗
50. 10.3389/fsufs.2019.0003810.3389/fsufs.2019.00038 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.12310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.123 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.17110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171 ↗
53. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0012510.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00125 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026 ↗
55. 10.1098/rstb.2018.022510.1098/rstb.2018.0225 ↗
56. 10.3390/ma1110182710.3390/ma11101827 ↗
57. 10.1039/d1ra02402g10.1039/d1ra02402g ↗
58. 10.1515/ntrev‐2020‐007610.1515/ntrev‐2020‐0076 ↗
59. 10.1007/s10570‐019‐02602‐x10.1007/s10570‐019‐02602‐x ↗
60. 10.1007/s10570‐014‐0470‐510.1007/s10570‐014‐0470‐5 ↗
61. 10.1007/s10570‐017‐1612‐310.1007/s10570‐017‐1612‐3 ↗
62. 10.3390/jfb304086410.3390/jfb3040864 ↗
63. 10.1590/S0102‐86502015004000000910.1590/S0102‐865020150040000009 ↗
64. 10.1002/jbm.a.3057010.1002/jbm.a.30570 ↗
65. 10.1177/088391151246764310.1177/0883911512467643 ↗
66. 10.1163/092050611X58151610.1163/092050611X581516 ↗
67. 10.3390/polym1006058110.3390/polym10060581 ↗
68. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0007810.1021/acs.biomac.7b00078 ↗