Surface chemical and physical modification in stent technology for the treatment of coronary artery disease
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Coronary artery disease (CAD) kills millions of people every year. It results from a narrowing of the arteries (stenosis) supplying blood to the heart. This review discusses the merits and limitations of balloon angioplasty and stent implantation, the most common treatment options for CAD, and the pathophysiology associated with these treatments. The focus of the review is heavily placed on research efforts geared toward the modification of stent surfaces for the improvement of stent‐vascular compatibility and the reduction in the occurrence of related pathophysiologies. Such modifications may be chemical or physical, both of which are surveyed here. Chemical modifications may be passive or active, while physical modification of stent surfaces can also provide suitable substrates to manipulate the responses of vascular cells (endothelial, smooth muscle, and fibroblast). The influence of micro‐ and nanostructured surfaces on the in vitro cell response is discussed. Finally, future perspectives on the combination of chemical and physical modifications of stent surfaces are also presented. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2012.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Mackay J · 2004 · 84
2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-910.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9 ↗
3. Cardiology's 10 greatest discoveries
4. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.01610.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90500-710.1016/S0140-6736(78)90500-7 ↗
6. 10.1056/NEJM19870319316120110.1056/NEJM198703193161201 ↗
7. 10.1016/0033-0620(90)90022-T10.1016/0033-0620(90)90022-T ↗
8. 10.1016/0735-1097(90)92845-S10.1016/0735-1097(90)92845-S ↗
9. 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90501-Q10.1016/0002-9149(90)90501-Q ↗
10. 10.1016/S0735-1097(88)80046-910.1016/S0735-1097(88)80046-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01742-910.1016/S0735-1097(01)01742-9 ↗
12. 10.1056/NEJM19940825331080210.1056/NEJM199408253310802 ↗
13. 10.1056/NEJM19940825331080110.1056/NEJM199408253310801 ↗
14. 10.1097/00041433-199912000-0000410.1097/00041433-199912000-00004 ↗
15. 10.1056/NEJMoa01284310.1056/NEJMoa012843 ↗
16. 10.1056/NEJMoa03507110.1056/NEJMoa035071 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2002.tb01091.x10.1111/j.1540-8183.2002.tb01091.x ↗
18. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.61806610.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618066 ↗
19. Ong ATL · 2005 · 372
20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17275-910.1016/S0140-6736(04)17275-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.08610.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.086 ↗
22. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.60015510.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.600155 ↗
23. 10.1001/jama.293.17.212610.1001/jama.293.17.2126 ↗
24. Do drug‐eluting stents increase deaths?Accessed June 9 2008from European Society of Cardiology ESC Event News World Congress of Cardiology. Available at:http://www.escardio.org/vpo/News/events/wcc_drugelutingstents_events.htm.
25. Boston scientific confirms long‐term clotting risk of drug‐eluting stents. Accessed June 9 2008 from Angioplasty.org website. Accessed date June 9 2008. Available at:http://www.ptca.org/news/2006/0907.html.
26. Nebeker JR · 2005 · 175
27. 10.1080/13645700276027334010.1080/136457002760273340 ↗
28. Borovetz HS · 2004 · 455
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.042 ↗
30. 10.1161/01.CIR.79.2.44510.1161/01.CIR.79.2.445 ↗
31. Models of stents—Comparison and applications10.33549/physiolres.931309 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.00710.1016/j.msea.2005.11.007 ↗
33. 10.1002/ccd.1024910.1002/ccd.10249 ↗
34. Park J · 2003
35. Ratner B · 2004
36. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00030-310.1016/S0142-9612(02)00030-3 ↗
37. Cardarelli F · 2008 · 59
38. On the nature of the biocompatibility and on medical applications of NiTi shape memory and superelastic alloys
39. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199610)32:2<243::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199610)32:2<243::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
40. 10.1002/jbm.a.3052610.1002/jbm.a.30526 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00299-X10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00299-X ↗
42. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199824)43:4<433::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-#10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199824)43:4<433::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
43. 10.1163/15685620332259969910.1163/156856203322599699 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00368-910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00368-9 ↗
45. 10.1002/1097-4636(200011)52:2<323::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/1097-4636(200011)52:2<323::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
46. 10.1136/jcp.2004.02417410.1136/jcp.2004.024174 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.01410.1016/j.addr.2006.01.014 ↗
48. Stent design: Implications for restenosis
49. Could stent design affect platelet activation? Results of the Platelet Activation in STenting (PAST) Study
50. 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01268-610.1016/S0002-9149(00)01268-6 ↗
51. 10.1067/mhj.2001.11732110.1067/mhj.2001.117321 ↗
52. 10.1161/01.CIR.91.12.299510.1161/01.CIR.91.12.2995 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00435-610.1016/S0002-8703(03)00435-6 ↗
54. A stent is not just a stent: Stent construction and design do matter in its clinical performance
55. 10.1002/ccd.1049910.1002/ccd.10499 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00119-010.1016/S0735-1097(03)00119-0 ↗
57. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02347-010.1016/S0002-9149(02)02347-0 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01989-710.1016/S0735-1097(02)01989-7 ↗
59. 10.1161/01.CIR.103.23.281610.1161/01.CIR.103.23.2816 ↗
60. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi09810.1093/eurheartj/ehi098 ↗
61. 10.1136/heart.89.2.21810.1136/heart.89.2.218 ↗
62. 10.1097/01.hco.0000133658.77024.5910.1097/01.hco.0000133658.77024.59 ↗
63. 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90856-810.1016/0002-9149(93)90856-8 ↗
64. 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80321-X10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80321-X ↗
65. 10.1201/b1462610.1201/b14626 ↗
66. 10.1161/01.CIR.79.6.137410.1161/01.CIR.79.6.1374 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00450-610.1016/S0735-1097(97)00450-6 ↗
68. 10.1161/01.CIR.98.3.22410.1161/01.CIR.98.3.224 ↗
69. 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00509-810.1016/S0002-9149(98)00509-8 ↗
70. 10.1006/clim.1999.477610.1006/clim.1999.4776 ↗
71. 10.1161/hc0502.10296610.1161/hc0502.102966 ↗
72. 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00006-110.1016/S0008-6363(99)00006-1 ↗
73. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.14.169710.1161/01.CIR.102.14.1697 ↗
74. 10.1161/01.RES.84.3.30610.1161/01.RES.84.3.306 ↗
75. Pathophysiology of coronary artery restenosis
76. 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2005.09.00210.1016/j.cpcardiol.2005.09.002 ↗
77. 10.1161/01.RES.56.1.13910.1161/01.RES.56.1.139 ↗
78. Pathophysiology of coronary artery restenosis
79. Drug‐eluting stents: The end of restenosis?10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V33N4p423 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.04210.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042 ↗
81. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.62134210.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621342 ↗
82. 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00373-810.1016/0735-1097(95)00373-8 ↗
83. 10.1161/01.CIR.93.8.154210.1161/01.CIR.93.8.1542 ↗
84. Restenosis after coronary stent placement and randomization to a 4‐week combined antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy—Six‐month angiographic follow‐up of the intracoronary stenting and antithrombotic regimen (ISAR) trial
85. 10.1161/01.CIR.100.8.79910.1161/01.CIR.100.8.799 ↗
86. 10.1161/01.CIR.100.1.2110.1161/01.CIR.100.1.21 ↗
87. 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70247-410.1016/S0002-8703(99)70247-4 ↗
88. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04518-910.1016/S0140-6736(00)04518-9 ↗
89. 10.1053/euhj.2001.262710.1053/euhj.2001.2627 ↗
90. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000038982.49640.7010.1161/01.CIR.0000038982.49640.70 ↗
91. 10.1002/jbm.82006040610.1002/jbm.820060406 ↗
92. 10.1002/jbm.82019040410.1002/jbm.820190404 ↗
93. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199806)26:7<483::AID-SIA388>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199806)26:7<483::AID-SIA388>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
94. 10.1002/jbm.a.3142910.1002/jbm.a.31429 ↗
95. William G. · 1982 · 715
96. 10.1007/s10856-006-9228-410.1007/s10856-006-9228-4 ↗
97. 10.1023/A:101983180850310.1023/A:1019831808503 ↗
98. Development and assessment of 316LVM cardiovascular stents10.1016/S0921-5093(04)00974-8 ↗
99. Wang K · 1997
100. Reduced thrombogenicity of polished and unpolished nitinol vs. stainless steel slotted‐tube stents in a pig coronary artery model