Effect of Cu Content on the Semi-Solid Formability and Mechanical Properties of Ti-Cu Alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The formability of Ti-Cu alloys and their mechanical properties after semi-solid forging were investigated. The formability was evaluated by upsetting and die forging tests. Tensile test was also performed to study the mechanical properties of Ti-Cu alloys after semi-solid forging. The results show that the semi-solid forging requires lower upsetting forces in the temperature range from 1000 °C to 1150 °C compared with conventional solid forging. Die forging tests show that the semi-solid forged Ti-Cu alloys have an excellent workability with a forging ratio of 75% in the temperature range from 1000 °C to 1050 °C. The Ti 2 Cu phase increases with the increase of Cu content, and more liquid precipitates during semi-solid deformation at higher temperatures and higher Cu content, which relaxes the stress concentration caused by solid deformation and improves the formability. Tensile test reveals that semi-solid forged Ti-Cu alloys exhibit higher strength and lower ductility than conventional forged alloys. The Ti-Cu alloys have lower ductility and higher strength with the increasing of Cu content. The difference in tensile properties is attributed to the change of Ti 2 Cu precipitates at different Cu contents and semi-solid forging temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Flemings · 1974 · 160
2. Lutjering · 2003 · 178
3. Donachie · 2003 · 115
4. Eskin · Pro Mater Sci[J] · 2004 · 49 · 62910.1016/S0079-6425(03)00037-9 ↗
5. Iwaski · Acta Mater[J] · 1998 · 46 · 635110.1016/S1359-6454(98)00330-9 ↗
6. Möller · Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China[J] · 2010 · 20 · 84710.1016/S1003-6326(10)60593-6 ↗
7. Chino · Acta Mater[J] · 2003 · 51 · 330910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00162-9 ↗
8. Hu · Scripta Mater[J] · 2009 · 60 · 42710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.011 ↗
9. Khosravani · J Alloy Compd[J] · 2009 · 477 · 82210.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.149 ↗
10. Putgen · Acta Mater[J] · 2007 · 55 · 655310.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.010 ↗
11. Zhou · Mater Sci Eng A[J] · 1988 · 243 · 294
12. Zhao · Mater Sci Eng A[J] · 2004 · 373 · 31510.1016/j.msea.2004.02.005 ↗
13. Chen · Mater Sci Eng A[J] · 2009 · 520 · 1610.1016/j.msea.2009.05.003 ↗
14. Chen · Rare Met Mater Eng[J] · 2012 · 41 · 0199
15. Chen · Rare Met Mater Eng[J] · 2012 · 41 · 0581
16. Kikuchi · Dental Materials[J] · 2003 · 19 · 37510.1016/S0109-5641(02)00080-5 ↗
17. Kikuchi · Dental Materials[J] · 2003 · 19 · 17410.1016/S0109-5641(02)00027-1 ↗
18. Bhaskan · Scripta Meta[J] · 2004 · 19 · 31910.1016/0036-9748(85)90322-9 ↗
19. Souza · Mater Sci Eng C[J] · 2009 · 29 · 102310.1016/j.msec.2008.09.007 ↗
20. Yao · J Alloy Compd[J] · 2009 · 484 · 19610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.095 ↗
21. Nagarjuna · Scripta Meta[J] · 1999 · 41 · 35910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00187-6 ↗
22. Nagarjuna · Mater Sci Eng A[J] · 2008 · 491 · 33
23. Nagarjuna · Mater Sci Eng A[J] · 2005 · 406 · 18610.1016/j.msea.2005.06.064 ↗