The in vitro growth and activity of sheep osteoblasts on three‐dimensional scaffolds from poly(L/DL‐lactide) 80/20%
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Critical‐size bone defects usually require the use of autogenous bone grafts to heal. Harvesting of bone is traumatic, and results in high morbidity of donor site. A potential alternative to bone graft may be a bone substitute with adequate biocompatibility and biological properties produced from ceramics and/or bioresorbable or biodegradable polymers. In the present study, sheep osteoblasts isolated from cancellous bone chips were seeded and cultured for 1, 2, and 3 weeks on porous poly(L/DL‐lactide) 80/20% scaffolds. The cell morphology was assessed from rhodamine staining and scanning electron microscopy, cell growth, and activity from the measurements of DNA, alkaline phosphatase activity, and total protein amount in the cell lysate, and mineral deposits from EDAX and van Kossa staining. The cells attached firmly to the scaffold walls, grew deeply into the pores, and exhibited morphology typical of osteoblasts. Mineralized noduli with a Ca/P ratio of 1.4 to 1.8 found in the scaffold indicated that the cells had maintained their osteoblastic phenotype. The amount of DNA, alkaline phosphatase activity, and the total amount of proteins increased with time of culturing, although at 3 weeks the cells did not yet reach the contact inhibition. These results demonstrate that three‐dimensional porous poly(L/DL‐lactide) 80/20% scaffolds provide a suitable substrate for the attachment and growth of primary osteoblasts, and might potentially be used as bone defect fillers and in the design of tissue‐engineered bone substitutes. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2005
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Autologous bone grafting: Complication at the donor site
2. Culture if human osteoblast on demineralized human bone: A possible means of graft enhancement10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.1312095 ↗
3. 10.1177/09636897940030041410.1177/096368979400300414 ↗
4. Ibarra C · 1996 · 235
5. 10.1089/ten.1996.2.5110.1089/ten.1996.2.51 ↗
6. 10.1097/00006534-199410000-0000210.1097/00006534-199410000-00002 ↗
7. 10.1089/ten.1999.5.54510.1089/ten.1999.5.545 ↗
8. 10.1097/00003086-199910001-0003610.1097/00003086-199910001-00036 ↗
9. Biodegradable polyurethane cancellous bone graft substitute promotes bone regeneration in the iliac crest defects
10. GogolewskiS GornaK TurnerAS.Regeneration of bicortical defects in the iliac crest of estrogen‐deficient sheep using new biodegradable polyurethane cancellous bone graft substitutes. A pilot study. Trans 8th Annu Meet Orthopaed Res Soc2002; 2:429.
11. GogolewskiS RahnB WielingR.Bone regeneration in critical‐size segmental defects in the tibiae using bioresorbable polymeric bone substitute. Trans 17th Annu Meet Orthopaed Trauma Assoc2001; 2:218–219.
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<183::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<183::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
13. 10.1063/1.177136010.1063/1.1771360 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)32662-610.1016/S0094-1298(20)32662-6 ↗
15. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.1910.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.19 ↗
16. Autogenous cultured bone graft‐bone reconstruction using tissue engineering approach
17. 10.1007/BF0234477910.1007/BF02344779 ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:6<913::AID-JBM22>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:6<913::AID-JBM22>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
19. 10.1097/00007890-200001150-0002210.1097/00007890-200001150-00022 ↗
20. 10.1177/0022034501080011150110.1177/00220345010800111501 ↗
21. 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00727-510.1016/S8756-3282(02)00727-5 ↗
22. 10.1163/156856295X0080510.1163/156856295X00805 ↗
23. 10.1089/10763270175333764510.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
24. Attachment and growth of balb/3T3 fibroblasts on patterned polylactide membranes
25. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.009 ↗
27. 10.1177/09636897950040041310.1177/096368979500400413 ↗
28. 10.1097/00005131-199604000-0000610.1097/00005131-199604000-00006 ↗
29. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199607)31:3<385::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199607)31:3<385::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
30. 10.1097/00005131-199903000-0000610.1097/00005131-199903000-00006 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00132-810.1016/S0020-1383(02)00132-8 ↗
32. 10.1007/PL0001445510.1007/PL00014455 ↗
33. McKellarG CollinsA GogolewskiS.Resorbable polylactide membranes in cranio and maxillofacial surgery. Animal studies and clinical results. Transaction of the 6th Congress Italian Society for Biomaterials Milan Italy December 12–13 1997.
34. Clinical application of resorbable polymers in guided bone regeneration
35. 10.1002/jbm.82023070810.1002/jbm.820230708 ↗
36. 10.1002/jbm.82005061310.1002/jbm.820050613 ↗
37. 10.1177/09636897940030041110.1177/096368979400300411 ↗
38. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<17::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<17::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
39. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
40. 10.1089/ten.1999.5.3510.1089/ten.1999.5.35 ↗
41. Effect of pore size of D,L‐polylactic acid as bone repair material on bone regeneration