journal article·2008-09-15

Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of early and immediately loaded implants in the dog mandible

Seong‐Yong Moon, Su‐Gwan Kim, Sung‐Chul Lim, Joo L. Ong

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract New bone formation around US III OSSTEM implants after early and immediate loading was evaluated in this study. Three premolars and the first and second molars were first removed from the left mandible of five dogs. At 3 weeks after extraction of the teeth in the left mandible, the corresponding teeth in the right mandibles were removed. After 12 weeks of bone healing, five implants were placed in the left mandible. At 3 weeks after placement of implants in the left mandible, another five were placed in the right mandible. At the time of placing implants in the right mandible, four implants on each side were restored using a fixed provisional restoration. The anterior‐most implant was not loaded and was used as controls. Periotest measurements performed immediately after implantation and after 16 weeks loading indicated implant stability for all groups tested. At 16 weeks after loading, the rate of peri‐implant bone formation for the early loaded, immediately loaded (IL), and control implants were observed to be 75.00, 73.37, and 62.04%, respectively. It was thus concluded that early stability was achieved in early and IL implants using fixed provisional restoration, thereby resulting in the high rate of peri‐implant bone formation. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Dental Radiography and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: Four‐year interim report
2. 10.1097/00008505-199908020-0001110.1097/00008505-199908020-00011 ↗
3. 10.1902/jop.1970.41.10.55110.1902/jop.1970.41.10.551 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-210.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.15910.1016/j.joms.2005.05.159 ↗
6. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.120906.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.120906.x ↗
7. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling
8. 10.1114/1.131753110.1114/1.1317531 ↗
9. Time of loading and effect of micromotion on bone–dental implant interface: Review of experimental literature10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
10. 10.1002/ar.109226040210.1002/ar.1092260402 ↗
11. Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: Ten consecutive case reports with 1‐ to 5‐year data
12. 10.1007/BF0227472710.1007/BF02274727 ↗
13. Clinical and histologic features of a nonaxial load on the osseointegration of a posterior mandibular implant: Report of a case
14. 10.1002/jbm.82021070510.1002/jbm.820210705 ↗
15. Experimental study on the functional adaptation to aluminium oxide, hydroxyapatite and titanium implants
16. 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90441-310.1016/0022-3913(94)90441-3 ↗
17. ITI implants with overdentures: A prevention of bone loss in edentulous mandibles
18. Das Perioteststverfahren‐Entwicklung und Klinische Prufung
19. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: An 8‐years report
20. Direkte Knochenverankerung von oralen Implantaten: Klinishe und experimentelle Betrachtungen des Konzepts der Osseointergration
21. Remodeling of devitalized bone threatens periosteal margin integrity of endosseous titanium implants with threaded or smooth surface: Indications for provisional loading and axially directed occlusion
22. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: A retrospective clinical report
23. 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90107-Y10.1016/0022-3913(93)90107-Y ↗
24. 10.1902/jop.1998.69.3.32110.1902/jop.1998.69.3.321 ↗
25. Immediate loading of modular transitional implants: A histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs
26. 10.1177/0022034588067009080110.1177/00220345880670090801 ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x ↗
28. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003207.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003207.x ↗
29. 10.1902/jop.1998.69.3.39610.1902/jop.1998.69.3.396 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70211-210.1016/S0889-5406(98)70211-2 ↗
31. Immediate loading of Branemark system implants following placement in edentulous patients: A clinical report
32. Immediate loading of bilaterally splinted titanium root‐form implants in fixed prosthodontics. A technique reexamined: Two case reports
33. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants (interview)