journal article·2016-04Open access

Hydrolytic charge‐reversal of PEGylated polyplexes enhances intracellular un‐packaging and activity of siRNA

Thomas A. Werfel, Corban Swain, Christopher E. Nelson, Kameron V. Kilchrist, Brian C. Evans, Martina Miteva, Craig L. Duvall

Abstract

Abstract Hydrolytically degrading nano‐polyplexes (HDG‐NPs) that reverse charge through conversion of tertiary amines to carboxylic acids were investigated to improve intracellular un‐packaging of siRNA and target gene silencing compared to a non‐degradable analog (non‐HDG‐NPs). Both NP types comprised reversible addition‐fragmentation chain‐transfer (RAFT) synthesized diblock copolymers of a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) corona‐forming block and a cationic block for nucleic acid packaging that incorporated butyl methacrylate (BMA) and either dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA, non‐HDG‐NPs) or dimethylaminoethyl acrylate (DMAEA, HDG‐NPs). HDG‐NPs decreased significantly in size and released significantly more siRNA (∼40%) than non‐HDG‐NPs after 24 h in aqueous solution. While both HDG‐NPs and non‐HDG‐NPs had comparable uptake and cytotoxicity up to 150 nM siRNA doses, HDG‐NPs achieved significantly higher target gene silencing of the model gene luciferase in vitro. High resolution FRET confocal microscopy was used to monitor the intracellular un‐packaging of siRNA. Non‐HDG‐NPs had significantly higher FRET efficiency than HDG‐NPs, indicating that siRNA delivered from HDG‐NPs was more fully un‐packaged and therefore had improved intracellular bioavailability. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 917–927, 2016.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering Vanderbilt Institute for Nanoscale Science and Engineering, Vanderbilt University School of Engineering Nashville Tennessee 37232

Funding

National institutes of Health · National Science Foundation

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/biot.20110005410.1002/biot.201100054 ↗
2. 10.1038/sj.gt.330270310.1038/sj.gt.3302703 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0312110.1038/nature03121 ↗
4. 10.1208/s12248-010-9210-410.1208/s12248-010-9210-4 ↗
5. 10.1002/bit.2128510.1002/bit.21285 ↗
6. 10.1038/nrd274210.1038/nrd2742 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat376510.1038/nmat3765 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.04.01810.1016/j.addr.2009.04.018 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.93.22.1234910.1073/pnas.93.22.12349 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.01410.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.014 ↗
11. 10.1021/mp800051m10.1021/mp800051m ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.07010.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.070 ↗
13. 10.1078/0171-9335-0036310.1078/0171-9335-00363 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.04.01810.1016/j.jconrel.2007.04.018 ↗
15. 10.1021/mp900015y10.1021/mp900015y ↗
16. 10.1038/nature0895610.1038/nature08956 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.141139311110.1073/pnas.1411393111 ↗
18. 10.1073/pnas.120071810910.1073/pnas.1200718109 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.05810.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.058 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn403325f10.1021/nn403325f ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20120221510.1002/adfm.201202215 ↗
22. 10.1021/bm501394m10.1021/bm501394m ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.05110.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.051 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.08410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.084 ↗
25. 10.1021/bm801127d10.1021/bm801127d ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.07710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.077 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja047490610.1021/ja0474906 ↗
28. 10.1021/bm401139e10.1021/bm401139e ↗
29. 10.1002/adhm.20140067110.1002/adhm.201400671 ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms290510.1038/ncomms2905 ↗
31. 10.1021/ma980689g10.1021/ma980689g ↗
32. 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000012165.68765.e610.1023/B:PHAM.0000012165.68765.e6 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.00410.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.12.06110.1016/j.polymer.2004.12.061 ↗
35. 10.1021/ma981472p10.1021/ma981472p ↗
36. 10.1021/nn301383810.1021/nn3013838 ↗
37. EvansBC NelsonCE YuSS BeaversKR KimAJ LiH NelsonHM GiorgioTD DuvallCL.Ex vivo red blood cell hemolysis assay for the evaluation of pH‐responsive endosomolytic agents for cytosolic delivery of biomacromolecular drugs. Forthcoming. doi:doi:10.3791/50166(2013).
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.036 ↗
39. 10.1021/bm301721k10.1021/bm301721k ↗
40. 10.1021/bm200742310.1021/bm2007423 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00445-310.1016/S0142-9612(02)00445-3 ↗
42. 10.1021/bm200219e10.1021/bm200219e ↗
43. 10.1021/mp500499x10.1021/mp500499x ↗
44. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.041 ↗
45. 10.1023/A:101509630272010.1023/A:1015096302720 ↗
46. 10.1023/A:100754882649510.1023/A:1007548826495 ↗