journal article·2010-04

Effect of CaTiO3–CaCO3 prepared by alkoxide method on cell response

Andrea P. Rodriguez, Miho Inoue, Toshiyuki Tanaka, Michihiro Miyake, Ana M. Sfer, Etsuo Kishimoto, Hidetsugu Tsujigiwa, Rosario S. Rivera, Hitoshi Nagatsuka

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, calcium titanate (CaTiO3) and carbon‐containing materials have gained much attention in a number of biomedical material researches. To maximize the advantages of both materials, we developed a novel alkoxide method to get “calcium titanate with calcium carbonate” (CaTiO3–CaCO3). The objective was to evaluate the crystallinity and elemental composition of CaTiO3–CaCO3 prepared by alkoxide method, CaTiO3–aC elaborated by modified thermal decomposition method, commercially‐prepared CaTiO3, and the effect of these materials on the bone marrow stromal cell. Hydroxyapatite was used as positive control material. We examined the cellular proliferation, osteoblastic differentiation, and mineralization of KUSA/A1 cells cultured with the materials. The results showed that CaTiO3–CaCO3 and CaTiO3–aC contained evidence of calcium carbonate enhancing cell proliferation, osteoblastic differentiation, and mineralization. On the contrary, the commercially‐prepared CaTiO3 revealed absence of calcium carbonate with lower cell response than the other groups. The results indicated that calcium carbonate could play a key role in the cell response of CaTiO3 material. In conclusion, our findings suggest that CaTiO3–CaCO3 could be considered an important candidate as a biomaterial for medical and dental applications. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2010
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00235-410.1016/S0142-9612(97)00235-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.044 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.a.1016010.1002/jbm.a.10160 ↗
5. 10.2485/jhtb.17.4710.2485/jhtb.17.47 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00319-310.1016/S0928-4931(02)00319-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.04410.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.044 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:101320162762210.1023/A:1013201627622 ↗
9. 10.2320/matertrans.45.177810.2320/matertrans.45.1778 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00091-710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00091-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00159-210.1016/S0142-9612(97)00159-2 ↗
12. In vitro cytotoxicity of amorphous carbon films
13. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00135-010.1016/S0142-9612(99)00135-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90210-010.1016/0142-9612(94)90210-0 ↗
16. Natural coral exoskeleton as a bone graft substitute: A review
17. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.277510.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2775 ↗
18. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.143010.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1430 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ab.2004.02.00210.1016/j.ab.2004.02.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.009 ↗
21. Pull‐out strength and bone tissue reaction of plasma‐sprayed hydroxyapatite coating with different thicknesses or substrates
22. 10.1002/jcp.104151012510.1002/jcp.1041510125 ↗
23. 10.2485/jhtb.16.110.2485/jhtb.16.1 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.a.2013710.1002/jbm.a.20137 ↗
25. 10.1177/6.1.2210.1177/6.1.22 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.82019060810.1002/jbm.820190608 ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.a.3113610.1002/jbm.a.31136 ↗