journal article·2018-06Open access

Design and optimization of biocompatible polycaprolactone/poly (l‐lactic‐co‐glycolic acid) scaffolds with and without microgrooves for tissue engineering applications

Cristhiane Alvim Valente, Pedro Cesar Chagastelles, Natália Fontana Nicoletti, Giovanna Ramos Garcez, Bruna Sgarioni, Fábio Herrmann, Gustavo Pesenatto, Eduardo Goldani, Mara Lise Zanini, Maria Martha Campos, Ricardo Meurer Papaléo, Jefferson Braga da Silva, Nara Regina de Souza Basso

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the effects of smooth and microgrooved membrane blends, with different polycaprolactone (PCL)/ poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid) (PLGA) ratios on the viability, proliferation, and adhesion of different mammalian cell types. The polymer matrices with and without microgrooves, obtained by solvent casting, were characterized by field‐emission scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, contact angle and Young's modulus. Blend characterization showed an increase in roughness and stiffness of membranes with 30% PLGA, without any effect on the contact angle value. Pure PCL significantly decreased the viability of Vero, HaCaT, RAW 264.7, and human fetal lung and gingival fibroblast cells, whereas addition of increasing concentrations of PLGA led to a reduced cytotoxicity. Increased proliferation rates were observed for all cell lines. Fibroblasts adhered efficiently to smooth membranes of the PCL70/PLGA30 blend and pure PLGA, compared to pure PCL and silicone. Microgrooved membranes promoted similar cell adhesion for all groups. Microstructured membranes (15 and 20‐μm wide grooves) promoted suitable orientation of fibroblasts in both PCL70/PLGA30 and pure PLGA, as compared to pure PCL. Neuronal cells of the dorsal root ganglion exhibited an oriented adhesion to all the tested microgrooved membranes. Data suggest a satisfactory safety profile for the microgrooved PCL70/PLGA30 blend, pointing out this polymer combination as a promising biomaterial for peripheral nerve regeneration when cell orientation is required. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 106A: 1522–1534, 2018.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nerve injury and regeneration · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate Program in Materials Engineering and Technology Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil

Graduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil

Institute of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil

Faculty of Chemistry Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil

Faculty of Medicine Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil

Faculty of Physics Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil

Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro‐nanotechnology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40820-016-0103-710.1007/s40820-016-0103-7 ↗
2. 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2014.06.01010.1053/j.sempedsurg.2014.06.010 ↗
3. Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bioact
4. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.09.01310.1016/j.jconrel.2007.09.013 ↗
5. Peripheral nerve conduits: Technology update
6. 10.1038/nmat244110.1038/nmat2441 ↗
7. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.4010.1038/natrevmats.2016.40 ↗
8. 10.1098/rsif.2011.043810.1098/rsif.2011.0438 ↗
9. 10.1098/rsfs.2011.012310.1098/rsfs.2011.0123 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10856-010-4048-y10.1007/s10856-010-4048-y ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.00710.1016/j.addr.2009.07.007 ↗
12. Assessment of the viability of NIH3T3 fibroblast cells cultured in polymer matrices with rhGH
13. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/5/05501310.1088/1748-6041/11/5/055013 ↗
14. 10.1109/JMEMS.2014.236807110.1109/JMEMS.2014.2368071 ↗
15. 10.1179/1753555712Y.000000005410.1179/1753555712Y.0000000054 ↗
16. Ultrasound‐stimulated peripheral nerve regeneration within asymmetrically porous PLGA/Pluronic F127 nerve guide conduit10.1002/jbm.b.31659 ↗
17. 10.1155/2014/80243510.1155/2014/802435 ↗
18. 10.1205/cherd0621710.1205/cherd06217 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.013 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.009 ↗
21. 10.7150/thno.364210.7150/thno.3642 ↗
22. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.026610.1089/ten.tea.2014.0266 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10544-007-9068-010.1007/s10544-007-9068-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.02310.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.023 ↗
25. 10.1039/C6RA26931A10.1039/C6RA26931A ↗
26. 10.1002/pi.127210.1002/pi.1272 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10856-013-4922-510.1007/s10856-013-4922-5 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2007.00125.x10.1111/j.1529-8027.2007.00125.x ↗
29. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00278-710.1016/S0142-9612(00)00278-7 ↗
30. 10.1002/bit.2063410.1002/bit.20634 ↗
31. 10.1089/10763270175333766310.1089/107632701753337663 ↗
32. 10.1089/10763270276018464610.1089/107632702760184646 ↗
33. F1635‐11 A. Standard Test Method for in vitro Degradation Testing of Hydrolytically Degradable Polymer Resins and Fabricated Forms for Surgical Implants (2011).
34. AmericanA StandardN.Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting 1.2002;14:1–11.
35. ISO 10993‐5:2009. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices−Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. Geneva Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization;2009;1–34.
36. 10.1002/jbm.a.3601210.1002/jbm.a.36012 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10856-011-4398-010.1007/s10856-011-4398-0 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.06.03110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.06.031 ↗
39. In Vitro Degradation of poly (L‐co‐D,L lactic acid) containing PCL‐T10.4322/polimeros.2014.056 ↗
40. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/4/04501210.1088/1748-6041/11/4/045012 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.12.03010.1016/j.injury.2010.12.030 ↗
42. In vitro and in vivo testing of novel ultrathin PCL and PCL/PLA blend films as peripheral nerve conduit10.1002/jbm.a.32681 ↗
43. 10.2174/187432500140801019910.2174/1874325001408010199 ↗
44. 10.1155/2014/69825610.1155/2014/698256 ↗
45. 10.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.00205310.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.002053 ↗
46. 10.1371/journal.pone.001186210.1371/journal.pone.0011862 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.12.00210.1016/j.nantod.2014.12.002 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.5b0090010.1021/acsami.5b00900 ↗
49. 10.2147/IJN.S11057710.2147/IJN.S110577 ↗
50. 10.1021/bm034304010.1021/bm0343040 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00287-310.1016/S0142-9612(01)00287-3 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00014-010.1016/S0928-4931(02)00014-0 ↗
53. 10.3390/nano707017310.3390/nano7070173 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.01510.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.015 ↗
55. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.073010.1089/ten.tea.2011.0730 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.008 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.07.00610.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.07.006 ↗
58. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.030110.1089/ten.tea.2008.0301 ↗
59. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.017510.1089/ten.tea.2008.0175 ↗