journal article·2009-06

Bone‐like tissue formation on a biomimetic titanium surface in an explant model of osteoconduction

Juliane Isaac, Sabine Loty, Ahmad Hamdan, Tadashi Kokubo, Hyun‐Min Kim, Ariane Berdal, Jean‐Michel Sautier

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The clinical use of titanium in dental and orthopedic applications is limited. Over recent years, implant surfaces have undergone numerous modifications to enhance bone integration. In this study, we experimented a bioactive titanium using a simple chemical and moderate heat treatment that led to the formation of a bone‐like apatite layer on its surface in simulated body fluids. We used a bone explant model to demonstrate that cells can migrate from the explants and subsequently differentiate to form a mineralized nodular structure. Furthermore, these cells expressed alkaline phosphatase, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin and the transcription factor, Runx2. Using this model of osteoconduction, we showed that bioactive titanium bonds directly to bone, while pure titanium cannot. These findings show the importance of implant surface composition in promoting osteogenic cell differentiation and subsequent apposition of the bone matrix, allowing strong bonds to form. This model could be particularly beneficial to closely mimic bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone and Dental Protein Studies · Bone Metabolism and Diseases

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jbm.82005061110.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
2. Retrospective analysis of hydroxyapatite development for oral implant applications10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02452-1 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00586010028710.1007/s005860100287 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.82024030610.1002/jbm.820240306 ↗
5. 10.1177/0895937499013001100110.1177/08959374990130011001 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00030-110.1016/S0142-9612(98)00030-1 ↗
7. 10.1002/jor.110014060710.1002/jor.1100140607 ↗
8. 10.1302/0301-620X.81B4.928210.1302/0301-620X.81B4.9282 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.82029120410.1002/jbm.820291204 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.264.5155.4810.1126/science.264.5155.48 ↗
11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199609)32:1<111::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199609)32:1<111::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
12. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-9 ↗
13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199611)32:3<409::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199611)32:3<409::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
14. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2<121::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2<121::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
15. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00160-X10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00160-X ↗
16. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: A review of the literature
17. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.a.3102810.1002/jbm.a.31028 ↗
19. 10.5435/00124635-200600001-0003510.5435/00124635-200600001-00035 ↗
20. 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.23110.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.231 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.026 ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.a.3063710.1002/jbm.a.30637 ↗
23. The impact of oral implants ‐ Past and future, 1966–2042
24. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review
25. 10.1002/art.2175310.1002/art.21753 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0022306710.1007/BF00223067 ↗
27. 10.1016/0142-9612(87)90115-310.1016/0142-9612(87)90115-3 ↗
28. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics
29. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01168.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01168.x ↗
30. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80257-310.1016/S0092-8674(00)80257-3 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-510.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80258-510.1016/S0092-8674(00)80258-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80260-310.1016/S0092-8674(00)80260-3 ↗